ASSESSMENT OF GENETIC PARAMETERS AND TRAIT INTERRELATIONSHIPS IN EARLY MATURING SUGARCANE CLONES OVER THREE CROP CYCLES
251 / 217
Keywords:
Genetic advance, Genetic correlation, Heritability, Path analysisAbstract
This study evaluated seven early maturing sugarcane clones across three crop cycles at the Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle, to estimate genetic variability, heritability, trait associations, and direct effects on key economic traits. The analysis of variance indicated significant effects of genotype, season and genotype × season interactions for all traits under this study, except for number of millable canes, cane girth and single cane weight. Among ten sugarcane clones across three crop cycles, clone 2018A 133 showed the best overall performance for cane yield, sugar yield and millable canes, while 2018A 65 excelled in juice quality traits. The ratoon crop consistently exhibited higher genotypic coefficients of variation, broad-sense heritability, and genetic advance, especially for cane yield, commercial cane yield and number ofmillable canes, signifying their selection potential in later stages. Brix, Sucrose and CCS% demonstrated moderate to low GCV values over crop cycles, suggesting limited genetic variability.Cane yield and CCS yield both exhibited high heritability across the three crop cycles. Traits likeBrix, CCS%, and Sucrose showed low to moderate heritability in the early crop cycles but exhibitedsubstantial increase in later crop cycles. Traits such as cane yield, CCS yield, and number of millable canes had both high heritability and high genetic advance as a percentage of mean inthe ratoon crop. In contrast, traits like single cane weight and cane girth showed inconsistent heritability and genetic advance across cycles, reflecting genetic instability. Juice quality traits (Brix, Sucrose, CCS%) showed increased heritability and genetic advance in the ratoon crop.Cane yield showed a strong positive correlation with CCS yield in all crop cycles. Juice quality traits such as Brix, Sucrose, and CCS% showed very strong positive correlations among themselves in all cycles. CCS yield exhibited significant positive correlations along with substantial direct effects in each season, highlighting their importance as key selection criteria in sugarcane
breeding programs
References
1. Abu-Ellail, F.F., El-Taib, A.B and Masri, M.I.
2. 2017. Broad-sense heritability, genetic
3. correlation and genetic variability of
4. sugarcane yield components at first
5. selection stage. Journal of Sugarcane
6. Research, 7(1): 27–34.
7. Abu-Ellail, F.F., Gadallah, A.F.I and El-Gamal,
8. I.S.H. 2020. Genetic variance and
9. performance of five sugarcane varieties
10. for physiological, yield and quality traits
11. influenced by various harvest age.
12. Journal of Plant Production, 11(5): 429
13. 438.
14. Al-Jibouri, H., Miller, P.A and Robinson, H.F.
15. 1958. Genotypic and environmental
16. variances and covariances in an upland
17. cotton cross of interspecific origin.
18. Agronomy Journal, 50(10): 633–636.
19. Allard, R.W. 1961. Principles of plant breeding.
20. Soil Science, 91(6): 414.
21. Barreto, F.Z., Balsalobre, T.W.A., Chapola,
22. R.G., Garcia, A.A.F., Souza, A.P.,
23. Hoffmann, H.P and Carneiro, M.S. 2021.
24. Genetic variability, correlation among
25. agronomic traits, and genetic progress in
26. a sugarcane diversity panel. Agriculture,
27. 11(6): 533.
28. Burton, G.W and De Vane, E. 1953. Estimating
29. heritability in tall fescue (Festuca
30. arundinacea). Agronomy Journal, 45:
31. 478–481.
32. Dewey, D.R and Lu, K. 1959. A correlation and
33. path coefficient analysis of components
34. of crested wheatgrass seed production.
35. Agronomy Journal, 51(9): 515–518.
36. Directorate of Economics and Statistics (E&S),
37. Department of Agriculture and
38. Cooperation (DAC), Ministry of
39. Agriculture, Government of India. 2024.
40. The Second Advance Estimates of
41. production of Foodgrains, Oilseeds and
42. Other Commercial Crops for the year
43. 2023–24.
44. Jeena, A.S. 2023. Estimation of genetic
45. variability, character association and path
46. coefficient using sugarcane segregating
47. population. Electronic Journal of Plant
48. Breeding, 14(2): 665–674.
49. Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F and Comstock,
50. R.E. 1955. Estimates of genetic and
51. environmental variability in soybeans.
52. Agronomy Journal, 47: 314–318.
53. Milligan, S.B., Gravois, K.A., Bischoff, K.P and
54. Martin, F.A. 1990. Crop effects on genetic
55. relationships among sugarcane traits.
56. Crop Science, 30(4): 927–931.
57. Nair, N.V., Nagarajan, R., Mathew, M.D and
58. Sreenivasan, T.V. 1999. Components of
59. yield and quality in intraspecific hybrids
60. of Saccharum officinarum L. selected for
61. ancillary uses. Sugar Tech, 1: 124–127.
62. Reddy, G.E., Rakesh, G., Saicharan, M.,
63. Swapna, N., Swathi, Y., Naik, B.B and
64. Sridhar, M. 2024. Correlation among
65. yield, quality and mechanization amicable
66. traits in sugarcane clones. Journal of
67. Experimental Agriculture International,
68. 46(10): 585–592.
69. Saadan, A.S.A., Abazied, S.R and Abu-Ellail,
70. F.F.B. 2025. Assessment the correlation
71. and heritability of promising sugarcane
72. varieties for yield and quality attributes
73. affected by pre-harvest irrigation
74. 12
75. ASSESSMENT OF GENETIC PARAMETERS IN EARLY MATURING SUGARCANE CLONES
76. withholding periods. Journal of Plant
77. Production, 217–224.
78. Shanmuganathan, M., Annadurai, K.,
79. Nageswari, R and Asokhan, M. 2015.
80. Evaluation of sugarcane clones for
81. quantitative yield and quality characters
82. in AICRP trials for early season.
83. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 6(1):
84. 292–297.
85. Singh, R.K and Chaudhary, B.D. 1999.
86. Biometrical Genetics Analysis. Kalyani
87. Publishers.
88. Sugeerthi, S., Jayachandran, M and
89. Chinnusamy, C. 2018. Effect of planting
90. materials and integrated nutrient
91. management on yield of sugarcane seed
92. crop. Madras Agricultural Journal, 105.
93. Tabassum, Jeena, A.S and Rohit. 2023.
94. Estimation of genetic variability, character
95. association and path coefficient using
96. sugarcane segregating population.
97. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding,
98. 14(2): 665–674.
99. Tena, E., Mekbib, F and Ayana, A. 2016.
100. Heritability and correlation among
101. sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) yield and
102. some agronomic and sugar quality traits
103. in Ethiopia. American Journal of Plant
104. Sciences, 7(10): 1453–1477.
105. Tena, E., Tadesse, F., Million, F and Tesfaye,
106. D. 2023. Phenotypic diversity, heritability,
107. and association of characters in
108. sugarcane genotypes at Metehara Sugar
109. Estate, Ethiopia. Journal of Crop
110. Improvement, 37(6): 874–897.
111. Tolera, B., Gedebo, A and Tena, E. 2023.
112. Variability, heritability and genetic
113. advance in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.
114. hybrid) genotypes. Cogent Food &
115. Agriculture. 9(1): 2194482.
116. Tolera, B., Gedebo, A and Tena, E. 2024.
117. Genetic variability, character association
118. and path analysis in sugarcane
119. genotypes. Archives of Agronomy and
120. Soil Science, 70(1): 1–15.
121. Tyagi, S., Chandra, S and Tyagi, G. 2023.
122. Statistical modelling and forecasting
123. annual sugarcane production in India:
124. Using various time series models. Annals
125. of Applied Biology, 182(3): 371–380.
126. Vinu, V., Alarmelu, S., Elayaraja, K., Appunu,
127. C., Hemaprabha, G., Parthiban, S and
128. Varatharaj, M.K.C. 2024. Multi
129. environment analysis of yield and quality
130. traits in sugarcane (Saccharum sp.)
131. through AMMI and GGE biplot analysis.
132. Sugar Tech, 1–19.
133. Yadawad, A., Kongawad, B.Y., Kadlag, A.D and
134. Veena, B. 2022. Evaluation of advanced
135. sugarcane clones for cane yield and
136. quality traits in plant and ratoon crops.
137. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding,
138. 13(4): 1250–1259.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.