MOBILE PHONE USAGE AMONG THE RICE FARMERS FOR CROP MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN IMPHAL WEST DISTRICT OF MANIPUR
244 / 143
Authors
-
CHINVARMOI K
Department of Extension Education, Avinashislingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore-641043, Tamil Nadu, India
-
T RADHA
Department of Extension Education, Avinashislingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore-641043, Tamil Nadu, India
Keywords:
Agri apps, Agricultural information, Educational influence, Farmers decision making, Mobile phone, Rice crop managementAbstract
Mobile phones have played a crucial role in improving farmers’ decision-making process,
fostering social cohesion and strengthening relationships within farming communities. This study,
conducted in May 2023 with 150 respondents from Imphal West district, Manipur, examined the
socio-economic profiles of farmers, their farming practices and the adoption of mobile technology
in rice crop management. The findings indicated that 49.30% of respondents were aged over 47
years, with more than 21 years of farming experience. Smartphone usage (69.00%) was significantly
higher than keypad phones, with a strong preference for communication in the local Manipuri
dialect. However, the study revealed that farmers spent minimal time using mobile phones for
agricultural purposes, with the majority primarily using them for entertainment. Regarding mobile
phone utilization in rice crop management, 55.00% of respondents regularly accessed information
related to marketing activities, while 47.00% sought details on seed treatment. Educational
qualifications had a statistically significant influence on key farming practices such as seed
management and marketing (p< 0.01). Among institutional sources, 49.00% of respondents
frequently obtained agricultural information from Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) in the district. The
results further highlight statistically significant differences (denoted by ** at the 1% level) between
educational qualifications and the adoption of agricultural apps. These findings underscore the
need for targeted interventions to enhance farmers’ awareness and capacity to utilize mobile
technology effectively for agricultural decision-making and productivity improvement.
References
1. Aker, J. C., and Ksoll, C. 2016. Can mobile
2. phones improve agricultural outcomes?
3. Evidence from a randomized experiment
4. in Niger. Food Policy, 60: 44-51.
5. Athirah, R. N., Norasma, C. Y. N., and Ismail,
6. M. R. 2020, July. Development of an
7. android application for smart farming in
8. crop management. Earth and
9. environmental science. 540(1): 012074.
10. Chhachhar, A. R., Qureshi, B., Khushk, G. M.,
11. and Maher, Z. A. 2014. Use of mobile
12. phone among farmers for agriculture
13. information. European Journal of
14. Scientific Research. 119(2): 265-271.
15. Kumar, R. 2023. Farmers’ Use of the Mobile
16. Phone for Accessing Agricultural
17. Information in Haryana: An Analytical
18. Study. Open Information Science. 7(1),
19. 20220145.
20. Kumar, R. M., Chintalapati, P., Rathod, S.,
21. Vidhan Singh, T., Kuchi, S., Mannava, P.
22. B. B., and Sundaram, R. M. 2023.
23. Comparison of System of Rice
24. Intensification Applications and
25. Alternatives in India: Agronomic,
26. Economic, Environmental, Energy, and
27. Other Effects. Agronomy, 13(10): 2492.
28. Nath, D., Moirangthem, A., Sharma, R., and
29. Heisnam, P. 2022. Usefulness of Mobile
30. Phone Based Agro-advisories in
31. Manipur. Asian Journal of Agricultural
32. Extension, Economics & Sociology,
33. 40(10): 648-652.
34. Nweke, F.I. 1980. Farm Labour Problems of
35. Smallholder Cropping Systems. Nigeria
36. Quarterly Journal of International
37. Agriculture. 19: 257-288.
38. Panda, S., Das, T. K., and Pal, P. K. 2019. Use
39. of mobile phone by the farmers for
40. agriculture and allied activities.
41. International Journal of Inclusive
42. Development, 5(2): 49-51.
43. Rajneesh, S. M., and Sisodia, S. S. 2020.
44. Impact of Mobile Phone Based Services
45. on Rice Crop Management. Indian
46. Research Journal of Extension
47. Education, 20(1): 51-54.
48. Roy, S. S., Ansari, M. A., Sharma, S. K., Sailo,
49. B., Devi, C. B., Singh, I. M., and Ngachan,
50. S. V. 2018. Climate resilient agriculture
51. in Manipur. Current Science, 115(7),
52. 1342-1350.
53. Singha, K., and Mishra, S. 2015. Sustainability
54. of rice cultivation: a study of
55. Manipur. Rice Research.4 (1): 2375
56. 4338.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
