SUITABILITY OF EARLY MATURING SUGARCANE GENOTYPES FOR DELAYED HARVESTING


21 / 17

Authors

  • VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY U Sugarcane Research Station, Vuyyuru- 521 165 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • SHAKESPEARE P Sugarcane Research Station, Vuyyuru- 521 165 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,Guntur, Andhra Pradesh,India.
  • SATYAPRIYA LALITHA J Sugarcane Research Station, Vuyyuru- 521 165 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,Guntur, Andhra Pradesh,India.
  • SAILAJA RANI J Sugarcane Research Station, Vuyyuru- 521 165 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.05

Keywords:

Commercial cane sugar, Delayed harvesting, Early maturing sugarcane, Genotypes, Juice quality, Sucrose percent

Abstract

An experiment in sugarcane was conducted during 2021-22 to 2023-24 in strip-plot design
with three replications at Sugarcane Research Station, Vuyyuru. Sugarcane clones viz., 2012 V
67, 2012 V 123, 2013 V 126 and 2003 V 46 were tested for delayed harvesting. Significantly
more number of tillers per hectare were recorded by check variety 2003 V 46 (1,03,085) which
was statistically at par with 2012 V 67 (97,154) and  2013 V 126 (94,316) at 90, 180 and 240
days after planting. Millable canes were also significantly higher with 2003 V 46. Significantly
higher yield was recorded by 2003 V 46 (105.06 t/ha) followed by 2012 V 67 (96.42 t/ha) and
2013 V 126 (91.24 t/ha). Significantly more sucrose  percent was recorded with  2003 V 46
(20.15%) which was followed by 2012 V 123 (20.05%), 2012 V 67 (19.32%) and 2013 V 126
(19.18%).The variety 2003 V 46 recorded significantly more commercial cane sugar  (14.5 %)
which was statistically at par with 2012 V 123 (14.4%).The study clearly revealed that, the higher
cane yield, per cent sucrose  and commercial cane sugar were obtained with check variety  2003
V 46 over other new genotypes tested in this study.

References

Chen, J.C.P. and Chou, C.C. 1993. Cane Sugar

Handbook. 12th Edition. New York: John

Wiley and Sons.

Jain, R., Soloman, S. and Shrivastava, A.K.

2006. Sugarcane germination: an

overview. Indian Sugar, 55 (11): 15-30

Kulkarni, S.R., Garkar, R.M., Gaikwad, D.D. and

Pol, K.M. 2010. Evaluation of early

maturing sugarcane genotypes for yield

and quality. Cooperative Sugar, 41(9):

57-61.

Nayamuth, A.R, Nayamuth, B.F.C. and

Soopramanien G.C. 1999. Agro

physiological characteristics underlying

the sucrose accumulation pattern of early

and late varieties. Proceedings of the

South African Sugar Technologists

Association, 73: 157- 163.

Oliveira Dias de, M.E., Vaughan, B.E. and

Rykei, E.J. 2005. Ethanol as fuel: energy,

carbon dioxide balances and ecological

footprint. BioScience, 55: 593-602.

Prabhakar, K.M., Subba Rao, K.V., Naga

Madhuri, K., Rama Subbiah and

Karunasagar G. 2012. Evaluation of

promising sugarcane varieties for yield

and quality in alfisols. Journal of

Sugarcane Research, 2(1): 54-56.

Wang, J., Roe, B., Macmil, S., Yu, Q., Murray,

J.E., Tang, H., Chen, C., Najar, F., Wiley,

G., Bowers, J., Sluys, M.A.V., Rokhsar

D.S., Hudson, M.E, Moose, S.P., Paterson

A.H. and Ming, R. 2010. Microcollinearity

between autopolyploid sugarcane and

diploid sorghum genomes. BMC

Genomics, 11: 261

Downloads

Submitted

12-05-2026

Published

13-05-2026

How to Cite

U , V. B. R., & J , S. L. (2026). SUITABILITY OF EARLY MATURING SUGARCANE GENOTYPES FOR DELAYED HARVESTING (S. P & S. R. J, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 53(5), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.05