SUITABILITY OF EARLY MATURING SUGARCANE GENOTYPES FOR DELAYED HARVESTING
81 / 105
Authors
-
VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY U
Sugarcane Research Station, Vuyyuru- 521 165 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
-
SHAKESPEARE P
Sugarcane Research Station, Vuyyuru- 521 165 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,Guntur, Andhra Pradesh,India.
-
SATYAPRIYA LALITHA J
Sugarcane Research Station, Vuyyuru- 521 165 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,Guntur, Andhra Pradesh,India.
-
SAILAJA RANI J
Sugarcane Research Station, Vuyyuru- 521 165 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Keywords:
Commercial cane sugar, Delayed harvesting, Early maturing sugarcane, Genotypes, Juice quality, Sucrose percentAbstract
An experiment in sugarcane was conducted during 2021-22 to 2023-24 in strip-plot design
with three replications at Sugarcane Research Station, Vuyyuru. Sugarcane clones viz., 2012 V
67, 2012 V 123, 2013 V 126 and 2003 V 46 were tested for delayed harvesting. Significantly
more number of tillers per hectare were recorded by check variety 2003 V 46 (1,03,085) which
was statistically at par with 2012 V 67 (97,154) and 2013 V 126 (94,316) at 90, 180 and 240
days after planting. Millable canes were also significantly higher with 2003 V 46. Significantly
higher yield was recorded by 2003 V 46 (105.06 t/ha) followed by 2012 V 67 (96.42 t/ha) and
2013 V 126 (91.24 t/ha). Significantly more sucrose percent was recorded with 2003 V 46
(20.15%) which was followed by 2012 V 123 (20.05%), 2012 V 67 (19.32%) and 2013 V 126
(19.18%).The variety 2003 V 46 recorded significantly more commercial cane sugar (14.5 %)
which was statistically at par with 2012 V 123 (14.4%).The study clearly revealed that, the higher
cane yield, per cent sucrose and commercial cane sugar were obtained with check variety 2003
V 46 over other new genotypes tested in this study.
References
1. Chen, J.C.P. and Chou, C.C. 1993. Cane Sugar
2. Handbook. 12th Edition. New York: John
3. Wiley and Sons.
4. Jain, R., Soloman, S. and Shrivastava, A.K.
5. 2006. Sugarcane germination: an
6. overview. Indian Sugar, 55 (11): 15-30
7. Kulkarni, S.R., Garkar, R.M., Gaikwad, D.D. and
8. Pol, K.M. 2010. Evaluation of early
9. maturing sugarcane genotypes for yield
10. and quality. Cooperative Sugar, 41(9):
11. 57-61.
12. Nayamuth, A.R, Nayamuth, B.F.C. and
13. Soopramanien G.C. 1999. Agro
14. physiological characteristics underlying
15. the sucrose accumulation pattern of early
16. and late varieties. Proceedings of the
17. South African Sugar Technologists
18. Association, 73: 157- 163.
19. Oliveira Dias de, M.E., Vaughan, B.E. and
20. Rykei, E.J. 2005. Ethanol as fuel: energy,
21. carbon dioxide balances and ecological
22. footprint. BioScience, 55: 593-602.
23. Prabhakar, K.M., Subba Rao, K.V., Naga
24. Madhuri, K., Rama Subbiah and
25. Karunasagar G. 2012. Evaluation of
26. promising sugarcane varieties for yield
27. and quality in alfisols. Journal of
28. Sugarcane Research, 2(1): 54-56.
29. Wang, J., Roe, B., Macmil, S., Yu, Q., Murray,
30. J.E., Tang, H., Chen, C., Najar, F., Wiley,
31. G., Bowers, J., Sluys, M.A.V., Rokhsar
32. D.S., Hudson, M.E, Moose, S.P., Paterson
33. A.H. and Ming, R. 2010. Microcollinearity
34. between autopolyploid sugarcane and
35. diploid sorghum genomes. BMC
36. Genomics, 11: 261
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
