CONSERVATION TILLAGE PRACTICES FOR ENHANCED PRODUCTIVITY IN SUGARCANE–PADDY SYSTEM


39 / 15

Authors

  • RAMANA MURTHY K V Department of Agronomy, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle - 531001 Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • GOURI V Department of Agronomy, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle - 531001 Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • SIREESHA A Department of Agronomy, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle - 531001 Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • JAGANNADHA RAO P V K Department of Agronomy, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle - 531001 Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • ADILAKSHMI D Department of Agronomy, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle - 531001 Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • MUKUNDHA RAO CH Department of Agronomy, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle - 531001 Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.08

Keywords:

Conservation tillage, Paddy, Sugarcane, System productivity

Abstract

A field study was carried out at Regional Agricultural Research Station farm, Anakapalle
from 2022-23 to 2024-25 for three years to study the feasibility of conservation tillage practices
and its impact on crop establishment, growth of crop and weed, and productivity of Sugarcane in
Sugarcane-Paddy cropping system. The trial was carried out using a strip plot design with three
replications. The main plot factor comprised of conservation tillage practices and weed
management techniques in sub plots. The cropping cycle of sugarcane planting in furrows with
ridgemar in rice fallows + Cowpea during first year followed by Sugarcane (ratoon)+Cowpea
during second year andtaking up Pulse-Green manure-Paddy with minimal tillage and sowing
during the third  year in addition to chemical weed control methods for effective weed management
was found suitable to improve the overall productivity of Sugarcane-paddy system(217.47 t ha-1)
and economically profitable instead of the normal conventional system.

References

De Oliveira, I.N., De Souza, Z.M., Bolonhezi,

D., Totti, M.C.V., De Moraes, M.T.,

Lovera, L.H., De Souza Lima, E.,

Esteban, D.A.A., Oliveira, C.F.2022.

Tillage systems impact on soil physical

attributes, sugarcane yield and root

system propagated by pre-sprouted

seedlings. Soil and Tillage Research,

223. https://doi.org/10.1016/

j.still.2022.105460.

Geetha, P., Tayade, A.S., Chandrasekar, C.A.,

Selvan T and Rajesh Kumar.

2019. Agronomic response, weed

smothering efficiency and economic

feasibility of sugarcane and legume

intercropping system in Tropical

India. Sugar Tech 21, 838-842. (https://

doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0689-9.

Gepolani, M.E., Aguilar, E.A., Sanchez, P.B and

Supangco, E.P. 2020. Potential of

intercropping Corn and Cowpea to

ratooned Sugarcane for food and forage.

International Journal of Nutrition and

Food Engineering, 14(01):1.

Ghorai, A.K and Ghorai, A.K. 2023. Low Cost

Zero till In situ Green Manuring for Kharif

Rice-A Success Story. International

Journal of Environment and Climate

Change, 13(7): 317-323.

Ishita and Vaidya, P. 2020. A review on

intercropping effects on growth and yield

of sugarcane. Journal of Pharmacognosy

and Phytochemistry,9(5): 2992-2995

Nadeem, M., Tanveer, A., Sandhu, H., Javed,

S., Safdar, M.E., Ibrahim, M., Shabir,

M.A., Sarwar, M andArshad, U. 2020.

Agronomic and economic evaluation of

autumn planted sugarcane under different

planting patterns with lentil intercropping.

Agronomy,10:644.

Nageswari, R., Dhanushkodi, V., Chitra, K.,

Dhanalakshmi, K., AnandhaKrishnaveni,

S. Shanmuganathan, M., Baskaran, V

and Saranraj, T. 2022. Chemical and

mechanical options for management of

weeds in sugarcane in Cauvery Delta

Zone of Tamil Nadu. Agricultural

Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin

America, 53(11) : 10501-10506.

Panse V.G and Sukhatme P.V. Statistical

methods for Agricultural workers. Indian

council of Agricultural Research, New

Delhi. 1986.

Shukla, S.K., Jaiswal, V.P., Sharma, Lalan

Sharma, A. D. Pathak, Akhilesh Kumar

Singh, Rajendra

Gupta, S.

K.

Awasthi, Asha Gaur, AdilZubair and

Raghvendra Tiwari. 2020.Sugarcane

Yield Using Minimum Tillage Technology

Through Subsoiling: Beneficial Impact on

Soil Compaction, Carbon Conservation

and Activity of Soil Enzymes. Sugar

Tech 22, 987–1006. https://doi.org/

10.1007/s12355-020-00860-9.

Singh, K.M and Meena, M.S. 2013. Economics

of Conservation Agriculture:An Overview,

ICAR-RCER, Patna, Zonal Project

Directorate, Jodhpur, India.

Singh, G., Kumar, L., Chandra, S., Bhatnagar,

A and Raverkar, K.P. 2015.Response of

summer planted sugarcane (Saccharum

officinarum L.) to tillage practices and

planting methods. Madras Agricultural

Journal, 102 (1-3): 46-51.

Srivastava, R., Meena,K, Rai, A.K., Singh, S.,

Chaudhary, R.P., Chaturvedi, A.K and

Singh.N. 2023. Intercropping of cowpea

with spring sugarcane: A proven

technology toward the doubling income

of sugarcane growers in eastern part of

Uttar Pradesh. The Pharma Innovation

Journal,12(8): 1748-1751.

Surendran, U., Ramesh, V., Jayakumar, M.,

Marimuthu, S and Sridevi, G.

2016.Improved sugarcane productivity

with tillage and trash management

practices in semi-arid tropical

agroecosystem in India. Soil and Tillage

Research, 158: 10-21

Downloads

Submitted

12-05-2026

Published

13-05-2026

How to Cite

K V , R. M., & P V K , J. R. (2026). CONSERVATION TILLAGE PRACTICES FOR ENHANCED PRODUCTIVITY IN SUGARCANE–PADDY SYSTEM (G. V, S. A, A. D, & M. R. CH, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 53(5), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.08