CONSERVATION TILLAGE PRACTICES FOR ENHANCED PRODUCTIVITY IN SUGARCANE–PADDY SYSTEM


163 / 116

Authors

  • RAMANA MURTHY K V Department of Agronomy, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle - 531001 Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • GOURI V Department of Agronomy, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle - 531001 Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • SIREESHA A Department of Agronomy, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle - 531001 Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • JAGANNADHA RAO P V K Department of Agronomy, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle - 531001 Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • ADILAKSHMI D Department of Agronomy, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle - 531001 Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • MUKUNDHA RAO CH Department of Agronomy, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle - 531001 Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.08

Keywords:

Conservation tillage, Paddy, Sugarcane, System productivity

Abstract

A field study was carried out at Regional Agricultural Research Station farm, Anakapalle
from 2022-23 to 2024-25 for three years to study the feasibility of conservation tillage practices
and its impact on crop establishment, growth of crop and weed, and productivity of Sugarcane in
Sugarcane-Paddy cropping system. The trial was carried out using a strip plot design with three
replications. The main plot factor comprised of conservation tillage practices and weed
management techniques in sub plots. The cropping cycle of sugarcane planting in furrows with
ridgemar in rice fallows + Cowpea during first year followed by Sugarcane (ratoon)+Cowpea
during second year andtaking up Pulse-Green manure-Paddy with minimal tillage and sowing
during the third  year in addition to chemical weed control methods for effective weed management
was found suitable to improve the overall productivity of Sugarcane-paddy system(217.47 t ha-1)
and economically profitable instead of the normal conventional system.

References

1. De Oliveira, I.N., De Souza, Z.M., Bolonhezi,

2. D., Totti, M.C.V., De Moraes, M.T.,

3. Lovera, L.H., De Souza Lima, E.,

4. Esteban, D.A.A., Oliveira, C.F.2022.

5. Tillage systems impact on soil physical

6. attributes, sugarcane yield and root

7. system propagated by pre-sprouted

8. seedlings. Soil and Tillage Research,

9. 223. https://doi.org/10.1016/

10. j.still.2022.105460.

11. Geetha, P., Tayade, A.S., Chandrasekar, C.A.,

12. Selvan T and Rajesh Kumar.

13. 2019. Agronomic response, weed

14. smothering efficiency and economic

15. feasibility of sugarcane and legume

16. intercropping system in Tropical

17. India. Sugar Tech 21, 838-842. (https://

18. doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0689-9.

19. Gepolani, M.E., Aguilar, E.A., Sanchez, P.B and

20. Supangco, E.P. 2020. Potential of

21. intercropping Corn and Cowpea to

22. ratooned Sugarcane for food and forage.

23. International Journal of Nutrition and

24. Food Engineering, 14(01):1.

25. Ghorai, A.K and Ghorai, A.K. 2023. Low Cost

26. Zero till In situ Green Manuring for Kharif

27. Rice-A Success Story. International

28. Journal of Environment and Climate

29. Change, 13(7): 317-323.

30. Ishita and Vaidya, P. 2020. A review on

31. intercropping effects on growth and yield

32. of sugarcane. Journal of Pharmacognosy

33. and Phytochemistry,9(5): 2992-2995

34. Nadeem, M., Tanveer, A., Sandhu, H., Javed,

35. S., Safdar, M.E., Ibrahim, M., Shabir,

36. M.A., Sarwar, M andArshad, U. 2020.

37. Agronomic and economic evaluation of

38. autumn planted sugarcane under different

39. planting patterns with lentil intercropping.

40. Agronomy,10:644.

41. Nageswari, R., Dhanushkodi, V., Chitra, K.,

42. Dhanalakshmi, K., AnandhaKrishnaveni,

43. S. Shanmuganathan, M., Baskaran, V

44. and Saranraj, T. 2022. Chemical and

45. mechanical options for management of

46. weeds in sugarcane in Cauvery Delta

47. Zone of Tamil Nadu. Agricultural

48. Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin

49. America, 53(11) : 10501-10506.

50. Panse V.G and Sukhatme P.V. Statistical

51. methods for Agricultural workers. Indian

52. council of Agricultural Research, New

53. Delhi. 1986.

54. Shukla, S.K., Jaiswal, V.P., Sharma, Lalan

55. Sharma, A. D. Pathak, Akhilesh Kumar

56. Singh, Rajendra

57. Gupta, S.

58. K.

59. Awasthi, Asha Gaur, AdilZubair and

60. Raghvendra Tiwari. 2020.Sugarcane

61. Yield Using Minimum Tillage Technology

62. Through Subsoiling: Beneficial Impact on

63. Soil Compaction, Carbon Conservation

64. and Activity of Soil Enzymes. Sugar

65. Tech 22, 987–1006. https://doi.org/

66. 10.1007/s12355-020-00860-9.

67. Singh, K.M and Meena, M.S. 2013. Economics

68. of Conservation Agriculture:An Overview,

69. ICAR-RCER, Patna, Zonal Project

70. Directorate, Jodhpur, India.

71. Singh, G., Kumar, L., Chandra, S., Bhatnagar,

72. A and Raverkar, K.P. 2015.Response of

73. summer planted sugarcane (Saccharum

74. officinarum L.) to tillage practices and

75. planting methods. Madras Agricultural

76. Journal, 102 (1-3): 46-51.

77. Srivastava, R., Meena,K, Rai, A.K., Singh, S.,

78. Chaudhary, R.P., Chaturvedi, A.K and

79. Singh.N. 2023. Intercropping of cowpea

80. with spring sugarcane: A proven

81. technology toward the doubling income

82. of sugarcane growers in eastern part of

83. Uttar Pradesh. The Pharma Innovation

84. Journal,12(8): 1748-1751.

85. Surendran, U., Ramesh, V., Jayakumar, M.,

86. Marimuthu, S and Sridevi, G.

87. 2016.Improved sugarcane productivity

88. with tillage and trash management

89. practices in semi-arid tropical

90. agroecosystem in India. Soil and Tillage

91. Research, 158: 10-21

Downloads

Published

13-05-2026

How to Cite

K V , R. M., & P V K , J. R. (2026). CONSERVATION TILLAGE PRACTICES FOR ENHANCED PRODUCTIVITY IN SUGARCANE–PADDY SYSTEM (G. V, S. A, A. D, & M. R. CH, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 53(5), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.08