ANTIXENOSIS AND ANTIBIOSIS EFFECTS OF SELECTED RICE CULTURES AGAINST THE BROWN PLANTHOPPER (NILAPARVATA LUGENS (STÅL))
95 / 81
Keywords:
Brown planthopper, Feeding preference, Feeding rate, Pot culture experiments, Rice culturesAbstract
Pot culture experiments were carried out in glasshouse at Andhra Pradesh Rice Research
Institute and Regional Agricultural Research Institute, Maruteru, West Godavari district, Andhra
Pradesh during the period 2010 to 2011 to study the antixenosis and antibiosis effects of twelve
rice cultures on rice brown planthopper feeding activity along with resistant check (Ptb 33) and
susceptible check (TN1). Among those, the rice cultures which recorded significantly maximum
number of feeding marks were MTU 1075 (128.10), MTU IJ 206-7-4-1 (112.80), MTU PLA 99-1-3
1-2 (110.20) and resistant check, Ptb 33 (61.50) than TN1 (24.30). The rice cultures, MTU IJ
206-7-4-1 (25.60 mm2), Ptb 33 (58.80 mm2), NLR 3093 (65.60 mm2) and RGL 7002 (87.80
mm2)excreted significantly less amount of honeydew compared to the susceptible culture, TN1
(450.40 mm2) indicating that these were less preferable for BPH feeding.
References
1. Alagar, M., Suresh, S., Samiyappan, R. and
2. Saravanakumar,D. 2007. Reaction of
3. resistant and susceptible rice genotypes
4. against brown planthopper (Nilaparvata
5. lugens). Phytoparasitica, 35. Pp. 346
6. 356.
7. Boopathi, T. and Bharathi, M. 2008. Feeding
8. behavior and population status of
9. Nilaparvata lugens (Stal.) in rice
10. genotypes. Pestology, 32: Pp.32-37.
11. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical
12. Procedures for Agricultural Research,
13. John Wiley and Sons, New Delhi. Pp.680.
14. Hu, S.J., Fu, D.Y., Han, Z.L.and Ye, H. 2015.
15. Density, demography, and influential
16. environmental factors on overwintering
17. populations of Sogatella furcifera
18. (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) in Southern
19. Yunnan. China Journal of Insect
20. Science, 15(1):58.https://doi.org/
21. 10.1093/jisesa/iev041.
22. Khan, Z.R. and Saxena, R.C. 1986. Effect of
23. steam distillate extracts of resistant and
24. susceptible rice cultivars on behavior of
25. Sogatella furcifera, Homoptera:
26. Delphacidae. Journal of Economic
27. Entomology, 79: Pp.928-935.
28. Li, J., Chen, Q., Wang, L., Liu, J., Shang, K
29. and Hua, H. 2011. Biological effects of
30. rice harbouring Bph14 and Bph15 on
31. brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens.
32. Pest Managment Science,67: Pp. 528
33. 534
34. Painter, R. H. 1951. Insect resistance in crop
35. plants, Macmillan, New York. Pp.520.
36. Sarao, P.S. and Bentur, J.S. 2016. Antixenosis
37. and tolerance of rice genotypes against
38. brown planthopper. Rice Science,
39. 23:Pp.96-103.
40. Sogawa, K. 1982. The rice brown planthopper:
41. Feeding physiology and host plant
42. interactions.
43. Annual Review of
44. Entomology, 27: Pp.49-73.
45. Sogawa, K. and Pathak, M.D. 1976.
46. Mechanism of brown planthopper
47. resistance in Mudgo variety in rice
48. (Hemiptera:Delphacidae). Applied
49. Entomology and Zoology, 5: 145-158.
50. Udayasree, M.and Rajanikanth, P. 2018. Non
51. Preference / Antixenosis and Antibiosis
52. Mechanism Contributing to BPH
53. Resistance in Certain Identified Elite Rice
54. Genotypes. International Journal of
55. Current Microbiology and Applied
56. Sciences,7(6): Pp.1908-1914.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.