RESISTANCE MECHANISM STUDIES IN SELECTED RICE GENOTYPES AGAINST BROWN PLANTHOPPER, NILAPARVATA LUGENS (STAL)
96 / 110
Keywords:
BPH, Honeydew, Non-Preference, Preference, ToleranceAbstract
Twelve identified rice genotypes along with susceptible check (TN 1) and resistant check
(PTB 33) were investigated for resistance against BPH during rabi 2021-22 at Regional Agricultural
Research Station, Maruteru, Andhra Pradesh. Preference/non-preference mechanism was
assessed through honeydew excretion studies and tolerance was measured through number of
days to wilt. Brown planthopper fed on these genotypes excreted significantly lower quantity of
honeydew than the susceptible TN 1 (529.33 mm2). Among the genotypes, PTB 18 and HWR-21
IR 71033-121-15-B recorded minimum honeydew excreted area of 91.00 mm2 and were equivalent
with the resistant check (78.67 mm2). The number of days taken by the genotypes to wilt ranged
from 21.33 to 34.67 days. The susceptible check TN 1 and resistant check PTB 33 took 21.33
and 34.67 days to wilt respectively. Among the genotypes, MTU 2837-31-1-1-1 took longer (32.33
days) to wilt followed by PTB 18 which took 30.33 days.
References
1. Alagar, M., Suresh, S., Samiyappan, R and
2. Saravanakumar, D. 2007. Reaction of
3. resistant and susceptible rice genotypes
4. against brown planthopper (Nilaparvata
5. lugens). Phytoparasitica, 35 (4): 346
6. 356.
7. Alam, S.N., Cohen, M.B. 1998. Detection and
8. analysis of QTLs for resistance to the
9. brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens in
10. a doubled-haploid rice population.
11. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 97:
12. 1370-1379.
13. Bhanu, K.V., Lakshmi, V.J., Katti, G and Reddy,
14. A.V. 2014. Antibiosis and tolerance
15. mechanisms of resistance in rice
16. varieties carrying brown planthopper
17. resistance genes. Asian Journal of
18. Biological and Life Sciences, 3 (2): 108
19. 113.
20. Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and
21. multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.
22. Gomez, K.A and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical
23. procedures for agricultural research,
24. Wiley India (P.) Ltd., New Delhi.13-28.
25. Mathur, K.C., Reddy, P.R., Rajamali, S and
26. Moorthy, B.T.S. 1999. Integrated pest
27. management of rice to improve
28. productivity and sustainability. Oryza, 36
29. (3):195- 207.
30. Mollah, M.L.R., Hossain, M.A., Samad, M.A and
31. Khatun, M.F. 2011. Settling and feeding
32. responses of brown planthopper to five
33. rice cultivars. International Journal of
34. Sustainable Crop Production, 6: 10-13.
35. Pathak, P.K and Heinrichs, E.A. 1980. A rapid
36. technique for estimating brown
37. planthopper feeding activity.
38. International Rice Research Newsletter,
39. 5 (3): 18-19.
40. Pathak, M.D and Khan, Z.R. 1994. Insect pests
41. of rice, International Rice Research
42. Institute, Philippines. 89.
43. Reddy, B.N., Lakshmi, V.J., Maheswari, T.U.,
44. Ramulamma, A and Katti, G.R. 2016.
45. Studies on antibiosis and tolerance
46. mechanism of resistance to brown
47. planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal.)
48. (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) in the selected
49. rice entries. The Ecoscan,10: 269-275.
50. Sarao, P.S and Bentur, J.S., 2018.
51. Quantification of antibiosis levels in nine
52. different rice genotypes against
53. Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera:
54. Delphacidae). International Journal of
55. Tropical Insect Science, 38 (4): 330-339.
56. Strauss, S.Y. and Agrawal, A.A. 1999. The
57. ecology and evolution of plant tolerance
58. to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and
59. Evolution, 14 (5): 179-185.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.