RESISTANCE MECHANISM STUDIES IN SELECTED RICE GENOTYPES AGAINST BROWN PLANTHOPPER, NILAPARVATA LUGENS (STAL)
28 / 12
Authors
-
ANUSHA B
Agricultural College, Rajamahendravaram, AP – 533 105 Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur,Andhra Pradesh, India
-
Nanda Kishore
Agricultural College, Rajamahendravaram, AP – 533 105 Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur,Andhra Pradesh, India
-
SANDHYA RANI C
Agricultural College, Rajamahendravaram, AP – 533 105 Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur,Andhra Pradesh, India
-
BHUVANESWARI V
Agricultural College, Rajamahendravaram, AP – 533 105 Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur,Andhra Pradesh, India
-
SRINIVASA RAO V
Agricultural College, Rajamahendravaram, AP – 533 105 Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur,Andhra Pradesh, India
-
RAMANA RAO P V
Agricultural College, Rajamahendravaram, AP – 533 105 Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur,Andhra Pradesh, India
Keywords:
BPH, Honeydew, Non-Preference, Preference, ToleranceAbstract
Twelve identified rice genotypes along with susceptible check (TN 1) and resistant check
(PTB 33) were investigated for resistance against BPH during rabi 2021-22 at Regional Agricultural
Research Station, Maruteru, Andhra Pradesh. Preference/non-preference mechanism was
assessed through honeydew excretion studies and tolerance was measured through number of
days to wilt. Brown planthopper fed on these genotypes excreted significantly lower quantity of
honeydew than the susceptible TN 1 (529.33 mm2). Among the genotypes, PTB 18 and HWR-21
IR 71033-121-15-B recorded minimum honeydew excreted area of 91.00 mm2 and were equivalent
with the resistant check (78.67 mm2). The number of days taken by the genotypes to wilt ranged
from 21.33 to 34.67 days. The susceptible check TN 1 and resistant check PTB 33 took 21.33
and 34.67 days to wilt respectively. Among the genotypes, MTU 2837-31-1-1-1 took longer (32.33
days) to wilt followed by PTB 18 which took 30.33 days.
References
Alagar, M., Suresh, S., Samiyappan, R and
Saravanakumar, D. 2007. Reaction of
resistant and susceptible rice genotypes
against brown planthopper (Nilaparvata
lugens). Phytoparasitica, 35 (4): 346
356.
Alam, S.N., Cohen, M.B. 1998. Detection and
analysis of QTLs for resistance to the
brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens in
a doubled-haploid rice population.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 97:
1370-1379.
Bhanu, K.V., Lakshmi, V.J., Katti, G and Reddy,
A.V. 2014. Antibiosis and tolerance
mechanisms of resistance in rice
varieties carrying brown planthopper
resistance genes. Asian Journal of
Biological and Life Sciences, 3 (2): 108
113.
Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and
multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.
Gomez, K.A and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical
procedures for agricultural research,
Wiley India (P.) Ltd., New Delhi.13-28.
Mathur, K.C., Reddy, P.R., Rajamali, S and
Moorthy, B.T.S. 1999. Integrated pest
management of rice to improve
productivity and sustainability. Oryza, 36
(3):195- 207.
Mollah, M.L.R., Hossain, M.A., Samad, M.A and
Khatun, M.F. 2011. Settling and feeding
responses of brown planthopper to five
rice cultivars. International Journal of
Sustainable Crop Production, 6: 10-13.
Pathak, P.K and Heinrichs, E.A. 1980. A rapid
technique for estimating brown
planthopper feeding activity.
International Rice Research Newsletter,
5 (3): 18-19.
Pathak, M.D and Khan, Z.R. 1994. Insect pests
of rice, International Rice Research
Institute, Philippines. 89.
Reddy, B.N., Lakshmi, V.J., Maheswari, T.U.,
Ramulamma, A and Katti, G.R. 2016.
Studies on antibiosis and tolerance
mechanism of resistance to brown
planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal.)
(Hemiptera: Delphacidae) in the selected
rice entries. The Ecoscan,10: 269-275.
Sarao, P.S and Bentur, J.S., 2018.
Quantification of antibiosis levels in nine
different rice genotypes against
Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera:
Delphacidae). International Journal of
Tropical Insect Science, 38 (4): 330-339.
Strauss, S.Y. and Agrawal, A.A. 1999. The
ecology and evolution of plant tolerance
to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and
Evolution, 14 (5): 179-185.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
