PERFORMANCE OF NEW MID LATE SUGARCANE GENOTYPES UNDER DIFFERENT NITROGEN LEVELS IN NORTH COASTAL ZONE OF ANDHRA PRADESH


31 / 12

Authors

  • GOURI V Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle – 531 001 Acharya N.G Ranga Agriculture University, Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • RAMANA MURTHY K V Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle – 531 001 Acharya N.G Ranga Agriculture University, Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • KUMARI M B G S Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle – 531 001 Acharya N.G Ranga Agriculture University, Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • RAMALAKSHMI CH S Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle – 531 001 Acharya N.G Ranga Agriculture University, Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • ADILAKSHMI D Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle – 531 001 Acharya N.G Ranga Agriculture University, Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • PADMAVATHI P V Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle – 531 001 Acharya N.G Ranga Agriculture University, Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • MUKUNDA RAO CH Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle – 531 001 Acharya N.G Ranga Agriculture University, Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • ALIVENI A Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle – 531 001 Acharya N.G Ranga Agriculture University, Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.18

Keywords:

FYM, Nitrogen levels, Sugarcane genotypes, Sunnhemp incorporation

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Regional Agricultural Research Station farm, Anakapalle
with an objective to determine ideal amount of nitrogen requirement for mid-late Sugarcane
genotypes during the year 2024-25. Three new sugarcane genotypes viz.,2015A230 (CoA20325),
2015A233 (CoA20326),2015A93(CoA ) along with check variety 2009A252 (CoA14323) were
tested at four nitrogen levels viz., FYM @ 25 t ha-1 + 100% recommended dose of Nitrogen (F1),
FYM @ 25 t ha-1+ 125% recommended dose of Nitrogen (F2), FYM @ 25 t ha-1 + 150%
recommended dose of Nitrogen (F3) and application of 100% recommended dose of Nitrogen +
In situ incorporation of sunhemp sown as intercrop (F4). The recommended dose was 168 kg N
ha-1.  The trial was conducted in Factorial RBD with three replications. The findings of the study
showed that, the genotypes 2015A233 (85.6 t ha-1) and 2015A230 (82.1 t ha-1) recorded
considerably greater cane yield in comparison  to the other genotype 2015A93(77.7 t ha-1) and
check variety 2009A252 (79.2 t ha-1). Among the four nitrogen levels new mid late sugarcane
genotypes produced superior cane yield with application of FYM @ 25 t ha-1+150% RDN (84.3 t
ha-1) and 100% RDN + Sunhemp grown as intercrop and in situ incorporation (83.4 t ha-1).
Application of FYM @ 25 t ha-1+100% Recommended dose of Nitrogen recorded significantly
lower cane yield of 76.9 t ha-1. There was no difference in the juice quality parameters for different
treatments, however 2015A233 recorded high sucrose percent of 18.8. Among nitrogen levels,
application of 100% RDN + Sunhemp grown as intercrop and in situ incorporation recorded high
sucrose percent of 18.1.

References

Ahmed, A. Z., El-Laboudy, E. H. S.and Sherin,

H. A. Al-Maracy 2020. Productivity and

quality of some sugar cane varieties as

influenced by seeding rate. Journal of

Biological Chemistry and Environmental

Sciences,15: (2), 31-47.

Bahadar, K., Jamal, M., Sadiq, M., Sulaman,

M., Azim, H. and Balouch, M.S. 2002.

Genetic variation and ecological

suitability of new sugarcane genotypes

under the agro-climatic conditions of

Bannu (NWFP). Pakistan Sugar J., 17:

15–7.

Chitkaladevi T., Bharathalakshmi, M., Kumari,

M.B.G.S. and Nagarjuna, D. 2022.

Performance of new promising early

maturing sugarcane genotypes under

graded levels of nitrogen. International

Journal of Agriculture Sciences,14(11)

:11872-11873.

Deo, A., Ganer, D. W., and Nair, G. 2011. Effect

of nitrogen application on juice quality and

sugar yield in sugarcane. Indian Journal

of Agricultural Research, 45(4): 280

286.

Gouri,V.,Appalaswamy A., Rajkumar N and

Bharathalakshmi M.2017. 47th Annual

Convention of SISSTA, Tirupathi, 2017

SISSTA: Sugar Journal pp: 77-80.

Pandey, M.B. and Shukla, S.K. 2001. Response

of sugarcane (Sacchanun spp hybrid

complex) to planting seasons and

nitrogen levels. Indian Journal of

Agricultural Sciences, 71(4): 261- 263.

Shankar Shrestha, Kapil Paudel, Ram Krishna

Rajak.2018 Performance of Sugarcane

Genotypes Under different Nitrogen

Levels in Sub-Tropical Region of Nepal.

International Journal of Agricultural

Sciences and Natural Resources, 5(2):

30-33

Shukla S.K. 2003 Tillering pattern, growth and

productivity of promising sugarcane

genotypes under various planting

seasons and nitrogen levels in subtropical

India. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 48 (4)

: 3 12-3 15.

Singh D.P., Rana N.S and Sandeep Kumar

2001.Effect of nitrogen application on

juice quality and sugar yield in sugarcane

varieties. Indian Journal of Agronomy 46

(1) : 177-1 8 1

Yadav, S.P., Singh, S.C. and Bakshi, R. 2014.

Effect of different plant nutrients on yield

and quality of sugarcane. National

symposium on “Bio-energy for

sustainable Development- the potential

role of sugarcane” held at Coimbatore

(TN), India on 23- 25 June, 2014, pp. 170.

Yousif, E. M. M., Wafaa E. Grad and A. EL

Bakry 2021. Impact of nitrogen

fertilization on yield and quality for plant

cane, ratoon crop and correlation

analyses of some sugarcane varieties.

Direct Res. J. Agric. Food Sci., 9: 121

136.

Yousif, E. Moustafa. Mohamed, Abd El-Nasser.

El-Bakry and Mohamed. Ahmed. O. Galal

2023.Impact the age at harvest on yield

and quality of some promising sugarcane

varieties. Egypt. J. Agric. Res., 101 (2),

393-403.

Downloads

Submitted

12-05-2026

Published

13-05-2026

How to Cite

V , G. (2026). PERFORMANCE OF NEW MID LATE SUGARCANE GENOTYPES UNDER DIFFERENT NITROGEN LEVELS IN NORTH COASTAL ZONE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (R. M. K V, K. M B G S, R. CH S, A. D, P. P V, M. R. CH, & A. A, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 53(5), 106-111. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.18