EFFECT OF NANO FERTILIZER ON GROWTH, YIELD, NITROGEN UPTAKE AND ECONOMICS OF RICE IN ALLUVIAL SOILS OF GODAVARI ZONE OF ANDHRA PRADESH


32 / 10

Authors

  • RAMESH BABU P V Regional Agricultural Research Station, Maruteru – 534122 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • SRINIVAS M Regional Agricultural Research Station, Maruteru – 534122 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • DAKSHINAMURTHY K Regional Agricultural Research Station, Maruteru – 534122 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • SREENIVAS CH Regional Agricultural Research Station, Maruteru – 534122 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • ROJA V Regional Agricultural Research Station, Maruteru – 534122 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • VERONICA N Regional Agricultural Research Station, Maruteru – 534122 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • SRINIVAS T Regional Agricultural Research Station, Maruteru – 534122 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • GIRIJA RANI M Regional Agricultural Research Station, Maruteru – 534122 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • SAHADEVA REDDY B Regional Agricultural Research Station, Maruteru – 534122 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.23

Keywords:

Grain yield, Nano urea, Nutrient uptake

Abstract

A field trial was conducted during the Kharif and Rabi seasons of 2023–24 to evaluate the
efficacy of nano urea (NU) and super nano urea (SNU) on the growth, yield, nutrient uptake, and
economics of rice. The experiment consisted of 11 treatments: T1–Control (0% N; 100% P & K);
T2–Recommended Fertilizer Dose (RDF) representing 100% RDN (Kharif: 90-60-60 kg NPK ha-1;
Rabi: 180-90-60 kg NPK ha-1); T3–50% RDN; T4- 50% RDN + two sprays of conventional urea
@1.0% at active tillering (AT) and panicle initiation (PI) stages; T5- 50% RDN + two  sprays of NU
@0.4% at A.T & PI; T6- 50% RDN + three sprays of NU @0.4% at A.T, PI & heading; T7- 50% RDN
+ two sprays of SNU @0.25% at A.T & PI; T8- 50% RDN + two sprays of SNU @0.5% at A.T & PI;
T9- 50% RDN + two sprays of SNU @1.0% at A.T & PI; T10- 33% RDN + three sprays of SNU
@0.5% at A.T, PI & heading; and T11- 66% RDN + one spray of SNU @0.5% at heading. The
resultsrevealed that the application of 50% RDN with two foliar sprays of nano urea at the active
tillering and panicle initiation stages (T8
) proved effective in enhancing rice growth, yield attributes,
grain and straw yields, economic returns and nitrogen uptake. However, this treatment performed
on par to the 100% RDN (T2
) across two consecutive seasons on alluvial soils of the Godavari
zone.

References

Abdel-Aziz, H.M.M., Mohammed, N.A.H. and

Aya, M.O. 2018. Effect of foliar application

of nano chitosan NPK fertilizer on the

chemical composition of wheat grains.

Egyptian Journal of Botany, 58:87–95.

Anushka, A.S., Kumar, G.S., Sritharan, N.,

Radhamani, S., and Maragatham, S.

2023. Studies on the effect of nano-urea

on growth, yield, and nutrient use

efficiency in transplanted rice.

International Journal of Environment and

Climate Change, 13(10): 1547–1554.

Benzon, H.R.L., Rubenecia, M.R.U., Ultra, V.U.

and Sang, S.C. 2015. Nano-fertilizer

affects the growth, development and

chemical properties of rice. International

Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural

Research, 7: 105–117.

Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical

Procedures for Agricultural Research

(2ndEdn.). John Wiley and Sons, New

York. pp. 680.

Kantwa, S. and Yadav, L.R. 2022. Nano Urea:

Applications and Significance.Just

Agriculture, 2:1-6.

Nithya, B.N., Ramakrishna Naika, Naveen, D.V.

and Sunil Kumar, T. 2018. Influence of

nano zinc application on growth and yield

parameters of mulberry. International

Journal of Pure and Applied Biosciences,

6(2): 317–319.

Qureshi, A., Singh, D.K., and Dwivedi, S. 2018.

Nano fertilizers: a novel way to enhance

nutrient use efficiency and crop

productivity. International Journal of

Current Microbiology and Applied

Science, 7:3325–3335.

Upadhyay, P.K., Dey, A., Singh, V.K., Dwivedi,

B.S., Singh, T. and Shukla, G. 2023.

Conjoint application of nano-urea with

conventional fertilizers: An energy

efficient and environmentally robust

approach for sustainable crop

production.PLOS ONE, 18(7):

e0284009.

Wojtkowiak, K., Stepien, A., Warechowska, M.

and Raczkowski, M. 2014. Content of

copper, iron, manganese, and zinc in

typical light brown soil and spring triticale

grain depending on a fertilization

system.Journal of Elementology, 19:

833–844.

Downloads

Submitted

13-05-2026

Published

13-05-2026

How to Cite

P V , R. B. (2026). EFFECT OF NANO FERTILIZER ON GROWTH, YIELD, NITROGEN UPTAKE AND ECONOMICS OF RICE IN ALLUVIAL SOILS OF GODAVARI ZONE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (S. M, D. K, S. CH, R. V, V. N, S. T, G. R. M, & S. R. B, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 53(5), 134-142. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.23