MITIGATION PRACTICES FOR GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN ANIMAL HUSBANDRY


107 / 104

Authors

  • MARAM HARANI ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalyandurg, Anantapur-515761. ANGRAU University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, Indi
  • YUGANDHAR V ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalyandurg, Anantapur-515761. ANGRAU University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, Indi
  • MALLIKARJUN M ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalyandurg, Anantapur-515761. ANGRAU University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, Indi
  • SIREESHA E ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalyandurg, Anantapur-515761. ANGRAU University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, Indi
  • BALAJI NAIK K ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalyandurg, Anantapur-515761. ANGRAU University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, Indi
  • CHANDRAYUDU E ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalyandurg, Anantapur-515761. ANGRAU University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.30

Keywords:

Enteric methane, Manure management, Mitigation practice, Animal health, Productivity

Abstract

Animal husbandry significantly contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with
livestock accounting for an estimated 7 to 18 percent of global anthropogenic emissions. Mitigation
strategies targeting enteric methane (CH4) and management of manure are critical for lowering
the environmental effect of animal production. This paper reviews current mitigation practices,
including dietary strategies, feed supplements, manure management techniques, and climate
smart livestock management. Emphasizing the complex interactions between these practices,
this review highlights the contribution of improving Animal performance and well-being as key
strategies for GHG emission reduction. It also explores the capability for synergistic approaches
to limit the emissions across multiple components of the animal production system

References

1. Department of Animal Husbandry & Dairying.

2. 2018, October. 20th Livestock Census.

3. (Retrieved March 11, 2022, from https://

4. dahd.nic.in/animal-husbandry-statistics)

5. Dunkley, C.S. 2012. Carbon Foot-print of

6. Poultry Production Farms. Livestock and

7. PoultryEnvironmental Learning Center.

8. (http://www.extension.org/pages/58813/

9. live-webcast-information.)

10. EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency).

11. 2011. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas

12. Emissions and Sinks: 1990 – 2009,

13. Washington, DC, EPA.

14. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization),

15. 2010. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from

16. the DairySector: A Life Cycle Assessment.

17. Rome, Italy.

18. Garg, M.R., Sherasia, P.L., Bhanderi, B.M.,

19. Phondba, B.T., Shelke, S.K. & Makkar,

20. H.P.S.2012.Effects of feeding nutritionally

21. balanced rations on animal productivity,

22. feed conversionefficiency, feed nitrogen

23. use efficiency, rumen microbial protein

24. supply, parasitic load,immunity and

25. enteric methane emissions of milking

26. animals under field conditions.

27. Anim.Feed Sci. Technol. 179:24–35

28. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate

29. Change). (2007). Climate Change 2007:

30. Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability,

31. Summary for policy makers.(http://

32. www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/

33. wg2/en/spm.html.)

34. Thornton, P. K. (2010). Livestock Production:

35. Recent Trends, Future Prospects. (http:/

36. /dels.nas.edu/resources/staticassets/

37. banr/AnimalProductionMaterials/

38. ThorntonLivestockProductionTrends.pdf)

39. Upadhyay, R.C., Singh, S.V. and Ashutosh.

40. (2008). Impact of Climate Change on

41. Livestock. Indian Dairyman. 60: 98 102.

42. Broderick, G.A., Koegel, R.G., Walgenbach,

43. R.P. & Kraus, T.J. 2002. Ryegrass or

44. alfalfa silage as the dietary forage for

45. lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 85:

46. 1894–1901.

Downloads

Published

13-05-2026

How to Cite

MARAM HARANI. (2026). MITIGATION PRACTICES FOR GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN ANIMAL HUSBANDRY (Y. V, M. M, S. E, B. N. K, & C. E, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 53(5), 178-182. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.30