MITIGATION PRACTICES FOR GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
107 / 104
Keywords:
Enteric methane, Manure management, Mitigation practice, Animal health, ProductivityAbstract
Animal husbandry significantly contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with
livestock accounting for an estimated 7 to 18 percent of global anthropogenic emissions. Mitigation
strategies targeting enteric methane (CH4) and management of manure are critical for lowering
the environmental effect of animal production. This paper reviews current mitigation practices,
including dietary strategies, feed supplements, manure management techniques, and climate
smart livestock management. Emphasizing the complex interactions between these practices,
this review highlights the contribution of improving Animal performance and well-being as key
strategies for GHG emission reduction. It also explores the capability for synergistic approaches
to limit the emissions across multiple components of the animal production system
References
1. Department of Animal Husbandry & Dairying.
2. 2018, October. 20th Livestock Census.
3. (Retrieved March 11, 2022, from https://
4. dahd.nic.in/animal-husbandry-statistics)
5. Dunkley, C.S. 2012. Carbon Foot-print of
6. Poultry Production Farms. Livestock and
7. PoultryEnvironmental Learning Center.
8. (http://www.extension.org/pages/58813/
9. live-webcast-information.)
10. EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency).
11. 2011. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas
12. Emissions and Sinks: 1990 – 2009,
13. Washington, DC, EPA.
14. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization),
15. 2010. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from
16. the DairySector: A Life Cycle Assessment.
17. Rome, Italy.
18. Garg, M.R., Sherasia, P.L., Bhanderi, B.M.,
19. Phondba, B.T., Shelke, S.K. & Makkar,
20. H.P.S.2012.Effects of feeding nutritionally
21. balanced rations on animal productivity,
22. feed conversionefficiency, feed nitrogen
23. use efficiency, rumen microbial protein
24. supply, parasitic load,immunity and
25. enteric methane emissions of milking
26. animals under field conditions.
27. Anim.Feed Sci. Technol. 179:24–35
28. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
29. Change). (2007). Climate Change 2007:
30. Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability,
31. Summary for policy makers.(http://
32. www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/
33. wg2/en/spm.html.)
34. Thornton, P. K. (2010). Livestock Production:
35. Recent Trends, Future Prospects. (http:/
36. /dels.nas.edu/resources/staticassets/
37. banr/AnimalProductionMaterials/
38. ThorntonLivestockProductionTrends.pdf)
39. Upadhyay, R.C., Singh, S.V. and Ashutosh.
40. (2008). Impact of Climate Change on
41. Livestock. Indian Dairyman. 60: 98 102.
42. Broderick, G.A., Koegel, R.G., Walgenbach,
43. R.P. & Kraus, T.J. 2002. Ryegrass or
44. alfalfa silage as the dietary forage for
45. lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 85:
46. 1894–1901.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.