MITIGATION PRACTICES FOR GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN ANIMAL HUSBANDRY


33 / 6

Authors

  • MARAM HARANI ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalyandurg, Anantapur-515761. ANGRAU University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, Indi
  • YUGANDHAR V ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalyandurg, Anantapur-515761. ANGRAU University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, Indi
  • MALLIKARJUN M ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalyandurg, Anantapur-515761. ANGRAU University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, Indi
  • SIREESHA E ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalyandurg, Anantapur-515761. ANGRAU University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, Indi
  • BALAJI NAIK K ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalyandurg, Anantapur-515761. ANGRAU University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, Indi
  • CHANDRAYUDU E ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalyandurg, Anantapur-515761. ANGRAU University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.30

Keywords:

Enteric methane, Manure management, Mitigation practice, Animal health, Productivity

Abstract

Animal husbandry significantly contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with
livestock accounting for an estimated 7 to 18 percent of global anthropogenic emissions. Mitigation
strategies targeting enteric methane (CH4) and management of manure are critical for lowering
the environmental effect of animal production. This paper reviews current mitigation practices,
including dietary strategies, feed supplements, manure management techniques, and climate
smart livestock management. Emphasizing the complex interactions between these practices,
this review highlights the contribution of improving Animal performance and well-being as key
strategies for GHG emission reduction. It also explores the capability for synergistic approaches
to limit the emissions across multiple components of the animal production system

References

Department of Animal Husbandry & Dairying.

2018, October. 20th Livestock Census.

(Retrieved March 11, 2022, from https://

dahd.nic.in/animal-husbandry-statistics)

Dunkley, C.S. 2012. Carbon Foot-print of

Poultry Production Farms. Livestock and

PoultryEnvironmental Learning Center.

(http://www.extension.org/pages/58813/

live-webcast-information.)

EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency).

2011. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas

Emissions and Sinks: 1990 – 2009,

Washington, DC, EPA.

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization),

2010. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from

the DairySector: A Life Cycle Assessment.

Rome, Italy.

Garg, M.R., Sherasia, P.L., Bhanderi, B.M.,

Phondba, B.T., Shelke, S.K. & Makkar,

H.P.S.2012.Effects of feeding nutritionally

balanced rations on animal productivity,

feed conversionefficiency, feed nitrogen

use efficiency, rumen microbial protein

supply, parasitic load,immunity and

enteric methane emissions of milking

animals under field conditions.

Anim.Feed Sci. Technol. 179:24–35

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate

Change). (2007). Climate Change 2007:

Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability,

Summary for policy makers.(http://

www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/

wg2/en/spm.html.)

Thornton, P. K. (2010). Livestock Production:

Recent Trends, Future Prospects. (http:/

/dels.nas.edu/resources/staticassets/

banr/AnimalProductionMaterials/

ThorntonLivestockProductionTrends.pdf)

Upadhyay, R.C., Singh, S.V. and Ashutosh.

(2008). Impact of Climate Change on

Livestock. Indian Dairyman. 60: 98 102.

Broderick, G.A., Koegel, R.G., Walgenbach,

R.P. & Kraus, T.J. 2002. Ryegrass or

alfalfa silage as the dietary forage for

lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 85:

1894–1901.

Downloads

Submitted

13-05-2026

Published

13-05-2026

How to Cite

MARAM HARANI. (2026). MITIGATION PRACTICES FOR GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN ANIMAL HUSBANDRY (Y. V, M. M, S. E, B. N. K, & C. E, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 53(5), 178-182. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.5.30