Standardisation and categorization of indigenous microorganisms (IMOs) for inoculated deep litter piggery in India

SEEMA YADAV; P K BHARTI; G K GAUR; BHANITA DEVI; ABHISHEK ABHISHEK; N R SAHOO; RAJESH CHHABRA; ARUN SOMAGOND; MOHIT ANTIL

doi:10.56093/ijans.v90i4.104188

Authors

SEEMA YADAV ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
P K BHARTI ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
G K GAUR ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
BHANITA DEVI ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
ABHISHEK ABHISHEK ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
N R SAHOO ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
RAJESH CHHABRA ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
ARUN SOMAGOND ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
MOHIT ANTIL ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i4.104188

Keywords:

Bacteria, Fungi, Indigenous microorganisms, Inoculated deep litter housing

Abstract

The present experiment was conducted on standardisation and categorization of Indigenous Microorganisms (IMOs) in India for its future application as inoculum in inoculated deep litter housing of pigs. The cultivation of IMOs was accomplished in four steps, which involved use of half cooked rice, sugar sources, rice bran and soil at 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th steps, respectively. The cultivated IMOs at the end of each step from 1st to 4th were named accordingly as IMO-1, IMO-2, IMO-3 and IMO-4. The cultivation of IMOs was done in three groups based on the major sources of energy at 2nd step as control (brown sugar), treatment 1 (Jaggery) and treatment 2 (Molasses). The IMO-1 was obtained after 7 days which was confirmed based on the appearance of white coloured fungal mycelium in all the groups. The IMO-4 was considered as the final product of cultivation process which was confirmed by the presence of fungal mycelium interwoven in the soil. IMO-4 stage was further categorised in different microbial groups based on laboratory examination and only two categories of microbes were witnessed namely bacteria and fungi, none of yeast were found in those inoculums. Out of four types of bacterial colonies, IMB-3 confirmed the presence of Paenibacillus amylolyticus and IMB-4 as Enterococcus casseliflavus. The standardisation of IMOs as inoculum for deep litter housing was performed first time in India.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anyanwu C F, Ngohayon S L, IIdefonso R L and Ngohayon J L. 2015. Application of indigenous microorganism for bioconversion of agricultural waste. International Journal of Science and Research 4(5): 778–84.

Bakar N A A and Ibrahim N. 2013. Indigenous microorganism production and the effect on composting process. AIP Conference Proceedings, Malaysia. American Institute of Physics. pp. 283.

Cho H K and Koyama A. 1997. Korean natural farming: indigenous microorganisms and vital power of crop/livestock. Korean Natural Farming.

Gaur A C, Sadasivam V K, Mathur R C and Magu S P. I982. Role of mesophilic fungi in composting. Agricultural Waste 4(6): 453–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-4607(82)90040-3

Grady E N, MacDonald J, Liu L, Richman A and Yuan Z. 2016. Current knowledge and perspectives of Paenibacillus: A review. Microbial Cell Factories 15: 203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0603-7

Hoonpark and DuPonte M W. 2008. How to cultivate indigenous microorganisms. BIO-9, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Hawaii at Manoa.

Kumar B L and Gopal D V R S. 2015. Effective of indigenous microorganisms for sustainable environment. Biotechnology 5: 867–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-015-0293-6

Nakasaki K, Nag K and Kartia S. 2005. Microbial succession associated with organic matter decomposition during thermophilic composting of organic waste.Waste Management and Research 23: 48–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X05049771

Olufunmi A O. 2013. Optimization and characterisation of indigenous microorganisms isolated from tannery effluents in Nigeria. International Research Journal of Environmental Sciences 2: 14–21.

Olukunle O F. 2013. Characterisation of indigenous microorganisms associated with crude oil polluted soils and water using traditional techniques. Microbiology Journal 1: 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/mj.2013.1.11

Sadi T, Jeffey L S H, Rahim N, Rashdi A A, Nejis N A and Hassan R. 2006. Bio prospecting and management of microorganisms. National Conference on Agrobiodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, pp. 129–130.

Safari R, Adel M, Lazado C C, Marlowe C, Caipang A and Dadar M. 2016. Hostderived probiotics Enterococcus casseliflavus improves resistance against Streptococcus iniae infection in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) via immunomodulation. Fish and Shellfish Immunology 52: 198–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2016.03.020

Sait M, Hugenholtz P and Jansen P H. 2002. Cultivation of globally distributed soil bacteria from phylogenetic lineage previously only detected in cultivation-independent surveys. Environmental Microbiology 4: 654–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00352.x

Young K D. 2006. The selective value of bacterial shape. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 70: 660–703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00001-06