Productivity attributes of six desi cow breeds in Karnataka

D V KOLEKAR; M J CHANDRE GOWDA; C V SAIRAM; SREENATH DIXIT; RANDHIR SINGH

doi:10.56093/ijans.v93i3.104425

Authors

D V KOLEKAR ICAR- Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka
M J CHANDRE GOWDA ICAR- Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka
C V SAIRAM ICAR-CIBA, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
SREENATH DIXIT ICRISAT, Hyderabad, Telangana
RANDHIR SINGH ICAR-IIWBR, Karnal, Haryana

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v93i3.104425

Keywords:

Dairy farming, Desi cows, Economics, Nutrition, Productivity

Abstract

Desi cows are playing crucial role in the national economy for their draught power, milk, dung, fuel and urine. It is a source of subsidiary income for many families in India especially the resource poor. The present study was carried out in six districts of Karnataka with higher population of each of the six desi breeds. Forty farmers served as respondents for each breed, making the total sample size of 240 farm households. Deoni productivity was the best with 3.85 L/anim./day followed by 3.07 in case of Krishna Valley. Daily net return per animal was ₹ 18.20 in Deoni and ₹ 15.51 in Krishna Valley, while it was lowest in Malnad Gidda. Without considering cost of fodder, net return (₹/anim./day) was the highest for Hallikar followed by Deoni and Krishna Valley. Draught power, dual purpose utility, quality and taste of milk, adaptability to harsh tropical climate, religious sentiments and social esteem were the important attributes of desi cows. Natural service, open grazing, feeding concentrates, green fodder and hay, closed housing system, vaccination, utility of dung and urine in the farm, full hand milking method were the management strategies adopted. Shrinking holding size, non-availability of grazing land, longer inter-calving period, and poor milk production were the important constraints perceived by farmers. Non-availability of superior quality breeding bulls and high price of cattle feed were perceived as causes for decreasing indigenous cattle population.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akila N and Chander M. 2009. Farmers’ attitude towards utilization of draught bullocks in Indian agriculture. Livestock Research for Rural Development 21(76).

Akila N and Chander M. 2010. Management practices followed for draught cattle in the southern part of India. Tropical Animal Health Production 42: 239–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9412-x

Biradar N, Desai M, Manjunath L and Doddamani M T. 2013. Assessing contribution of livestock to the livelihood of farmers of Western Maharashtra. Journal of Human Ecology 41(2): 107–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2013.11906557

Gautam P L. 2007. Livestock in green revolution. Agriculture Today 3(2): 26–27.

GoI. 2019. 20th Livestock Census, All India Report. Department of Animal Husbandry Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Krishi Bhavan, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

GoI. 2014. Rashtriya Gokul Mission, Department of Animal Husbandry Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Krishi Bhavan, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

GoK. 2013. Karnataka state disaster management plan 2012-13, Centre for Disaster Management, Administrative Training Institute, Government of Karnataka. Retrieved http://www.ksdma.co.in/News_And_Events/Disaster_mangement_Cover_page_Combine.pdf [01-April-2015]

Gopalan C, Ramasastri B V and Balasubramanian S C. 1971. Nutritional value of Indian foods. Hyderabad: ICMR

Harris M. 2011. India’s sacred cow: Sociology, retrieved from http://sociology101.net/readings/Indias-sacred-cow.pdf [12-February-2015]

Initiative for domestic animal diversity report. 2010. Secondary guidelines for development of national farm animal genetic resources management plans.

Kolekar D V, Chander M, Avhad S R and Bangar Y C. 2015, Milk production parameters perceived by dairy farmers under contract farming in Western Maharashtra. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 68(2): 180–83.

Meena H R, Ram H, Singh S K, Mahapatra R K, Sahoo A and Rasool T J. 2007. Animal husbandry practices at high altitude (> 6000 feet) in Kumaon region of Uttrakhand, India. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19(163). Retrieved from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/11/meen19163.htm [22-March-2015]

Msanga Y N, Mwakilembe P L and Sendalo D. 2012. The indigenous cattle of the Southern Highlands of Tanzania: distinct phenotypic features, performance and uses. Livestock Research for Rural Development 24(110). Retrieved from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/7/msan24110.htm [1-April-2015].

National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources. 2022. Retrieved from https://nbagr.icar.gov.in/en/registered-cattle/ [23-November-2022]

Ngowi E E, Chenyambuga S W and Gwakisa P S. 2008. Socio-economic values and traditional management practices of Tarime zebu cattle in Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development 20(94). Retrieved from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/6/ngow20094.htm [15-March-2015].

Pathak H, Mishra J P and Mohapatra T. 2022. Indian agriculture after independence. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 110 001, pp 426.

Patil A P, Gawande S H, Gobade M R and Nande M P. 2009. Training needs of dairy farmers in Nagpur district. Veterinary World 2: 187–90.

Singh P K. 2013. ῾Sustainability of Gangatiri breed reared by dairy farmers in Eastern Uttar Pradesh.᾿ M.V.Sc, Thesis. Deemed University, National Dairy Research Institute, Izatnagar, India. 88 p.

Verma A K, Lal N, Manjusha J, Sachan R and Avhad S. 2014. Constraints faced by livestock farmers in rearing Kherigarh, an indigenous cattle breed of UP. Journal of Veterinary Science Technology 5(3): 116–18.

Woodford K. 2009. Devil in milk: Illness, health, and politics of A1 and A2 milk, Chelsea green publishing, New Zealand.

Yadav C M, Bhimawat B S and Khan P M. 2009. Existing breeding and healthcare practices of cattle in tribals of Dungarpur district of Rajasthan. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 9(1): 36–38.