ESTABLISHMENT AND PARTIAL CHARACTERIZATION OF FETAL FIBROBLAST CELLS OF BLACK BENGAL BREED
155 / 192
Authors
-
BISWAJYOTI BORAH
Department of Animal BiotechnologyCollege of Veterinary Science, khanaparaAAU, Assam
-
A P SINGH
Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 004 India
-
S K PANDEY
Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 004 India
-
T JAIN
Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 004 India
Keywords:
Establishment, Characterization, Fetal Fibroblast Cells, Black Bengal BreedAbstract
Animal cells are a valuable genetic resource and become the major tool for routine investigation of biological research and regenerative medicine. The somatic cells are as valuable as germ cells and an attractive resource for conserving animal genetic materials. The present study was to establish and characterized the caprine fetal fibroblast cell culture of Back Bengal goat's genetic resources; the breed is one of the highly prolific breeds among Indian breeds of goat and famous for meat and skin. The fetal fibroblast cells of Back Bengal goat breed at the age of 1-2 month was cultured. The cells were highly prolific, able to identify by molecular markers, with a population doubling time (PDT) approximately 73.6 hours and could be useful for gene expression study. These cells will be valuable assets for other genomics, post genomics, somatic cloning, and other fields of biological sciences in the future.
Downloads
References
Bangladeshi scientists decode genome sequence of Black Bengal goat. Prothom Alo. Retrieved 2019-08-26.
Bols N C, Brubacher J L, Ganassin R C and Lee L E J. 2001. Ecotoxicology and innate immunity in fish. Developmental
and Comparative Immunology 25: 853&73.
Bols N C and Lee J. 1991. Technology and uses of cell culture from tissues and organs of bony fish. Cytotechnology 6(3): 163&87.
Chen S L and Qin Q W. 2011. Theory and technology of fishes. Cell Culture.: Science Press, Beijing. Freshney R I. 2010. Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Technique. 6th ed. Wiley- Blackwell, New York. Roth V. 2006. http://www.doubling-time.com/compute.php Strutz F, Okada H, Lo C W, Danoff T, Carone R L, Tomaszewski
J E and Neilson E G. 1995. Identification and characterization of a fibroblast marker: FSP1. Journal of Cell Biology 130(2):393&405.
Weingart H M, Sabara M, Pasick J, van Moorlehem E and Babiuk L. 2002. Continuous porcine cell lines developed from alveolar macrophages partial characterization and virus susceptibility. Journal of Virological Methods 104(2): 203&16.
Wolf K. 1988. Fish Viruses and Fish Viral Diseases. Cornell University Press, New York. Zhou G Z, Gui L, Li Z Q, Yuan X P and Zhang Q Y. 2008. Establishment of a Chinese sturgeon Acipenser sinensis tailfin cell line and its susceptibility to frog irido virus. Journal of Fish Biology 73(8): 2058&67.
Annonymous. Fibroblast. Genetics Home Reference. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2014-05-05. Retrieved
-05&10.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.
How to Cite
