Comparative study of three prediction models in predicting the milk yields of Yunnan Holstein cows


166 / 70

Authors

  • ZHIYONG CAO Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650 201 China
  • XIUJUAN YANG Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650 201 China
  • XIZHANG XIZHANG Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650 201 China
  • WEIHUANG WEIHUANG Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650 201 China
  • LINLI TAO Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650 201 China
  • BIN DENG Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650 201 China
  • CHENCHEN CHENCHEN Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650 201 China
  • ZHAOCHENG SUN Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650 201 China

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i7.106681

Keywords:

BPNN model, Milk yield prediction, Quadrinomial model, Wood model

Abstract

The polynomial model and wood model have been extensively applied to predict the milk yield of cows, which aims to measure and partially explain the uncertainty under single factor condition. However, different sample data would affect the goodness of fit of the models. To investigate the milk yield regularities of the Chinese Holstein cows in Yunnan Standardized Pasture (YSP), data of cows with 1–3 parities using different observation periods were derived from the 401,497 records of 1,826 cows collected from YSP, and fitted in the BP neural network (BPNN) model, the Quadrinomial model and the Wood model. Prediction results of three models were compared. The results show that, for group data (mean), the Quadrinomial model was likely to over-fit under the single factor condition with small sample data, while the Wood model had a better goodness of fit; the BPNN model was more suitable for multi-factor and large sample data analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bilal G, Cue R I and Hayes J F. 2016. Genetic and phenotypic associations of type traits and body condition score with dry matter intake, milk yield, and number of breedings in first lactation Canadian Holstein cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 96(3): 434–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2015-0127

Cinar M, Serbester U, Ceyhan A and Gorgulu M. 2015. Effect of somatic cell count on milk yield and composition of first and second lactation dairy cows. Italian Journal of Animal Science 14(1): 3646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2015.3646

Deen A U, Tyagi N, Yadav R D, Kumar S, Tyagi A K and Singh S K. 2019. Feeding balanced ration can improve the productivity and economics of milk production in dairy cattle: a comprehensive field study. Tropical Animal Health and Production 51(4): 737–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1747-8

Fox D G, Van Amburgh M E and Tylutki T P. 1999. Predicting requirements for growth, maturity, and body reserves in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 82(9): 1968–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75433-0

Gaines W L. 1928. The energy basis of measuring milk yield in dairy cows. Bulletin (University of Illinois (Urbana- Champaign campus). Agricultural Experiment Station no. 308.

Gupta A, Singh M, Gandhi R, Singh A, Dash S and Dash S. 2016. Comparison of different lactation curve models in Sahiwal cattle up to fourth parity using monthly test day milk yields. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 69(4): 460–66

Hecht-Nielsen R. 1992. Theory of the backpropagation neural network, pp. 65–93. Neural Networks for Perception. Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-741252-8.50010-8

Heins B J, Chester-Jones H, Ziegler D, De Ondarza M B, Schuling S E, Ziegler B and Sniffen C J. 2016. 1243 Relationships between early life growth and first lactation performance of Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 94(suppl_5): 598–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jam2016-1243

Johnson I R, France J and Cullen B R. 2016. A model of milk production in lactating dairy cows in relation to energy and nitrogen dynamics. Journal of Dairy Science 99(2): 1605–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10068

Kristensen T, Jensen C, Østergaard S, Weisbjerg M R, Aaes O and Nielsen N I. 2015. Feeding, production, and efficiency of Holstein-Friesian, Jersey, and mixed-breed lactating dairy cows in commercial Danish herds. Journal of Dairy Science 98(1): 263–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8532

Xiong Benhai, Ma Yi and Luo Qing-yao. 2010. Study on lactation curve models of chinese holstein for the second parity. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 43(23): 4910–16. (in Chinese).

Macciotta N P P, Vicario D and Cappio-Borlino A. 2005. Detection of different shapes of lactation curve for milk yield in dairy cattle by empirical mathematical models. Journal of Dairy Science 88(3): 1178–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72784-3

Penasa M, De Marchi M and Cassandro M. 2016. Effects of pregnancy on milk yield, composition traits, and coagulation properties of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99(6): 4864–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10168

Sánchez-Pérez R, Berasain M D M, Elghandour M M M Y, Mellado M, Diaz L G C, Cipriano M and Salem A Z M. 2018. Mathematical model to predict the dry matter intake of dairy cows on pasture. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 88: 598– 601.

Mote S, Chauhan D and Ghosh N. 2016. Effect of environment factors on milk production and lactation length under different seasons in crossbred cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 50. 10.18805/ijar.9496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.9496

Sharma N, Narang R, Ratwan P, Kashyap N, Kumari S, Kaur S and Raina V. 2019. Prediction of first lactation 305-days lactation milk yield from peak yield and test day milk yields in crossbred cattle. Indian Journal Of Animal Sciences 89(2): 200–03.

Singh D K, Sahu S P and Teufel N. 2019. Increasing dairy cows productivity through new balanced concentrate feed: A Study in Bihar, India. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 36(1): 11– 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6744.2019.00002.1

Wang Ya-chun, et al. 1999. Dairy genetic analysis of curve fitting and model parameters. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica 30(5): 399–404. (in Chinese)

Wood P D P. 1967. Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle. Nature 216(5111): 164–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/216164a0

XIONG Ben-hai, et al. 2011. Study on lactation curve models of chinese holstein for the third parity. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 44(2): 402–08. (in Chinese)

Downloads

Submitted

2020-10-29

Published

2020-10-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

CAO, Z., YANG, X., XIZHANG, X., WEIHUANG, W., TAO, L., DENG, B., CHENCHEN, C., & SUN, Z. (2020). Comparative study of three prediction models in predicting the milk yields of Yunnan Holstein cows. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 90(7), 1054-1059. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i7.106681
Citation