Principal component analysis of morphometric and growth traits in crossbred piglets


156 / 155

Authors

  • SNEHASMITA PANDA ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • G K GAUR ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • N R SAHOO ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • P K BHARTI ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • JUNAID KAR ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i8.109303

Keywords:

Crossbred pig, Growth traits, Morphometric traits, Principal component analysis

Abstract

This investigation was undertaken to derive fewer independent common factors through principal component analysis to characterize 75% Landrace crossbreds. Records of 26 body measurements and weights at 4, 6 and 8 week from 279 crossbred (75% Landrace × 25% Bareilly local) piglets, born between September 2017 and April 2018 were used. Principal component analysis was done using PROC PRINCOMP Module of SAS 9.3 software. High correlation coefficients were observed among most of the morphometric and growth traits. Kaiser-Meyer- Olkin measure of sampling adequacy, Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity and communality at different ages were calculated. Three PCs were extracted at 4 week, two at 6 week and two at 8 week. These PCs accounted for 73.7, 73.76 and 75.45% variance, respectively of total variance. PC1 was represented by high loading of body length, heart girth and height at back at 4 week; and body length, heart girth and body weight at 6 and 8 week. PC2 had high loading for height at foreleg, height at shoulder, chest width and inner orbital width at 4 week; and height at foreleg, height at shoulder and snout circumference at 6 and 8 week. PC3 was characterized by snout circumference and ear length. PC1 seemed to explain the body of pig, i.e. general size; whereas PC2 seemed to represent the front view of the pig. Accounted PCs at different stage may be exploited in breeding and selection programmes to acquire highly coordinated animal bodies using fewer measurements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banik S, Naskar S, Pankaj P K, Sahoo N R, Tamuli M K and Das A. 2012. Effect of different body measurements on body weight in Ghungroo pigs. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 82(9): 1094.

Kaiser H F. 1960. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1): 141–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116

Khargharia G, Kadirvel G, Kumar S, Doley S, Bharti P K and Das M. 2015. Principal component analysis of morphological traits of Assam Hill goat in eastern Himalayan India. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 25(5): 1251–58.

Morenikeji O B, Chineke C A, Adu O A and Aro S O. Genetic correlation and heritabilities of performance traits among three pig genotypes. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research 4(3).

Okoro V M, Ogundu U E, Okani M, Oziri I, Eneowo O, Olisenekwu O T, Kadurumba O, Ogbuewu I P, Onyemauwa S, Ukwu H O and Ibe S N. 2015. Principal component analysis of conformation and blood marker traits at pre-and postweaning stages of growth in F2 crossbred Nigerian indigenous × Landrace pigs. Animal Biotechnology 26(4): 243–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2015.1014043

Oluwole O O, Tiamiyu A K, Olorungbounmi T O, Oladele-Bukola M O and Akintoye N A. 2014. Pre-weaning growth traits in Nigerian indigenous pig crossbreds. Agricultural Sciences 5(10): 891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2014.510096

Omitogun G O. 2016. Post-weaning morphology and growth traits of Nigerian indigenous pig and crossbred pigs. International Journal of Innovative Agriculture and Biology Research 4(1): 1.

Pundir R K, Singh P K, Singh K P and Dangi P S. 2011. Factor analysis of biometric traits of Kankrej cows to explain body conformation. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 24(4): 449–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10341

Sadek M H, Al Aboud A Z and Ashmawy A A. 2006. Factor analysis of body measurements in Arabian horses. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 123(6): 369–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00618.x

Tolenkhomba T C, Saikia P, Hmar L, Prava M and Singh N S. 2013. Principal component analysis of body measurements in Mizo local pigs. Indian Journal of Veterinary Research 22(1): 26–31.

Yakubu A, Ogah D M and Idahor K O. 2009. Principal component analysis of the morphostructural indices of White Fulani cattle. Trakia Journal of Sciences 7: 67–73.

Yunusa A J, Salako A E and Oladejo O A. 2013. Principal component analysis of the morphostructure of Uda and Balami sheep of Nigeria. International Research Journal of Agricultural Science 1(3): 45–51.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-01-06

Published

2021-01-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PANDA, S., GAUR, G. K., SAHOO, N. R., BHARTI, P. K., & KAR, J. (2021). Principal component analysis of morphometric and growth traits in crossbred piglets. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 90(8), 1168-1171. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i8.109303
Citation