Effect of variable interservice interval on conception in crossbred cows
212 / 121
Keywords:
Conception, Crossbred cows, Interservice intervalAbstract
Reducing number of services per conception holds the key for profitable dairying. The widely considered estrous cycle length of 21 d has been refuted, a change that can seriously implicate fertility. The present investigation evaluated association amongst interservice interval (ISI, the period intervening two successive inseminations) and services per conception alongwith certain cow related variables (age, lactation number, days in milk to AI, days in milk at conception, age at conception and 305 d lactation yield). Data on 768 ISIs (range: 17 to 24 d) from 1,479 AIs (600 in normal; 879 in repeat breeders) in 193 lactating Jersey crossbred cows conceiving to different number of inseminations, was utilized. The ISI data in form of average, immediately prior to conception and pattern (regular – if ISI between AIs was of same duration; irregular – if ISI between AIs was of different durations) was considered for analysis. Nearly 84% of ISI ranged from 19 to 22 d, merely 22.6% being of 21 d (overall average of 20.3±0.44 d). Correlation matrix revealed a solitary, significant and negative relation of ISI, both average and prior to conception, with services per conception. The ISI of ≥21 d culminated consistently into more number of pregnant cows as well as lesser services per conception. The forward selection regression model predicted reduction in ISI by 0.17 d with each additional insemination. Irregular pattern of ISI was also unfavourable for conception. The probable mechanisms for variable ISI in light of conception have been exhaustively elaborated, which could pave potential future studies aiming reduced reproductive wastage.
Downloads
References
BIS: 2052 (1979, reaffirmed 1990). Indian Standards Nutrient Requirements for Bovines. Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhawan, 9 Bahadurshah Jafar Marg, New Delhi, 110 002, India.
Bleach E C L, Glencross R G and Knight P G. 2004. Association between ovarian follicle development and pregnancy rates in dairy cows undergoing spontaneous oestrous cycles. Reproduction 127: 621–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00190
Breuel K F, Lewis P E, Schrick F N, Lishman A W, Inskeep E K and Butcher R L. 1993. Factors affecting fertility in the postpartum cow: role of the oocyte and follicle in conception rate. Biology of Reproduction 48: 655–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod48.3.655
Bridges G A, Mussard M L, Burke C R and Day M L. 2010. Influence of the length of proestrus on fertility and endocrine function in female cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 117: 208–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.05.002
Britt J H. 1995. The relationship between postpartum estrous cycles, estrus cycle length, and early embryonic death. Cattle Practice 3: 85–88.
Campos M S, Wilcox C J, Becerril C M and Diz A. 1994. Genetic parameters for yield and reproductive traits of Holstein and Jersey cattle in Florida. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 867–73. Cavestamy D and Galina C S. 2001. Evaluation of an artificial insemination programme in a seasonal breeding dairy system through milk progesterone. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 36: 79–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77021-1
Cooper D A, Carver D A, Villeneuve P, Silvia W J and Inskeep E K. 1991. Effects of progestagen treatment on concentration of prostaglandins and oxytocin in plasma from posterior vena cava of postpartum beef cows. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 91: 411–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0910411
Diskin M G, Parr M H and Morris D G. 2011. Embryo death in cattle: An update. Reproduction Fertility and Development 24: 244–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/RD11914
Forde N, Beltman M E, Lonergan P, Diskin M, Roche J F and Crowe M A. 2011. Oestrous cycles in Bos taurus cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 124: 163–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.025
Jaiswal R S, Singh J, Marshall L and Adams G P. 2009. Repeatability of 2-wave and 3-wave patterns of ovarian follicular development during the bovine estrous cycle. Theriogenology 72: 81–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.02.014
LeBlanc S. 2007. Economics of improving reproductive performance in dairy herds. Advances in Dairy Technology 19: 201–14.
Olds D and Seath D M. 1951. Repeatability of the estrous cycle length in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 34: 626–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(51)91757-2
Perea F, González R, Cruz R, Soto E, Rincón E, González C and Villamediana P. 1998. Evaluación ultrasonográfica de la dinámica folicular en vacas y en novillas mestizas. Revista Científica FCV-LUZ 8: 14–24.
Remnant J G, Green M J, Huxley J N and Hudson C D. 2015. Variation in the interservice intervals of dairy cows in the United Kingdom. Journal of Dairy Science 98: 889–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8366
Sartori R, Haughian J M, Shaver R D, Rosa G J M and Wiltbank M C. 2004. Comparison of ovarian function and circulating steroids in estrous cycles of Holstein heifers and lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87: 905–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73235-X
Sichtar J, Tolman R, Rajmon R, Klabanova P, Berka P and Volek J. 2010. A comparison of the follicular dynamics in heifers of the Czech Fleckvieh and Holstein breeds. Czech Journal of Animal Science 55: 234–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/242/2009-CJAS
Sood P, Sarma H D, Dogra P K, Kadwad R and Sachdev S S. 2016. Proceedings of the XV Annual Convention of Indian Society of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, pp. 14– 16. National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana.
Sood P. 2017. Proceedings of final project report on Ultrasonography and radioimmunoassay assisted endocrine modulation of ovarian follicular dynamics for augmentation of pregnancy rate in cows. Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS) BRNS Secretariat, Central Complex, 1st Floor Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) Trombay, Mumbai.
Sood P, Nanda A S, Singh N and Gandhotra V K. 2009a. Follicular dynamics in crossbred cows. Indian Journal of Animal Science 79: 887–89.
Sood P, Vasishta N K, Singh M M and Pathania N. 2009b. Prevalence and certain characteristics of mid-cyclic estrus in crossbred cows raised in sub-temperate zone of Himachal Pradesh, India. Veterinarski Arhiv 79: 143–49.
Sood P, Zachut M, Dube H and Moallem U. 2015. Behavioural and hormonal pattern of repeat breeder cows around estrus. Reproduction 149: 545–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-14-0598
Sreenan J and Diskin M. 1986. The extent and timing of embryonic mortality in the cow, pp. 1–11. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Amsterdam. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5038-2_1
Tenhagen B A, Vogel C, Drillich M, Thiele G and Heuwieser W. 2003. Influence of stage of lactation and milk production on conception rates after timed artificial insemination following Ovsynch. Theriogenology 60: 1527–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00141-9
Townson D H, Tsang P C, Butler W R, Frajblat M, Griel L C, Johnson C J, Milvae R A, Niksic G M and Pate J L. 2002. Relationship of fertility to ovarian follicular waves before breeding in dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 80: 1053–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8041053x
Walsh S W, Williams E J and Evans A C O. 2011. A review of the causes of poor fertility in high milk producing dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 123: 127–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.12.001
Wolfenson D, Inbar G, Roth Z, Kaim M, Bloch A and Braw-Tal R. 2004. Follicular dynamics and concentrations of steroids and gonadotropins in lactating cows and nulliparous heifers. Theriogenology 62: 1042–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.12.020
Xu Z Z, Burton L J and Macmillan K L. 1996. Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows following oestrus synchronization regimens with PGF2αand progesterone. Theriogenology 47: 687–701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00027-7
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.