Evaluation of rice gluten meal as a potential alternate feed source for poultry

S  ADIL; MANZOOR  A WANI; PROMOD  K TYAGI; A B  MANDAL

doi:10.56093/ijans.v92i5.112428

Authors

S ADIL ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
MANZOOR A WANI ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
PROMOD K TYAGI ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
A B MANDAL ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i5.112428

Keywords:

Apparent metabolizable energy, In-vitro pepsin pancreatin, Digestibility, Rice Gluten Meal, Proximate analysis

Abstract

A biological experiment was conducted in a factorial design (3×2×2) involving two substitution levels (20 and
40%) of basal diet with rice gluten meal (RGM) with and without enzymes (protease and multi-enzyme) in cockerels
following practical diet replacement method. Birds (72) were divided into nine groups containing eight cockerel
birds each. The conventional grower ration was provided to the birds for an adaptation period of 10 days followed by feeding of experimental diets for 14 days with final four days as collection period. A metabolic trial lasting for four days was done in which weighed quantity of feed was offered to birds and faeces voided were collected, weighed and dried. Both feed and faeces were analysed for gross energy value to calculate the apparent metabolizable energy for all diets and then apparent metabolizable energy (AME) of test ingredient, i.e. rice gluten meal. The AME value of RGM was 3035 and 3028 kcal/kg at 20 and 40% replacement levels of basal diet with a mean value of 3031 kcal/kg. However, with protease and multi-enzyme supplementation, a numerical increase of 37 and 35 kcal/kg of AME was observed, which was 1.22 and 1.15% more upon supplementation of protease and multi-enzyme, respectively. The proximate analysis revealed that rice gluten meal contains 92.30% dry matter which consists of 50% crude protein, 6.92% ether extract, 9.47% crude fibre, 21.54% nitrogen free extract and 4.37% ash. In vitro pepsin-pancreatin digestibility (IVPPD) of RGM was 81.50%. The total phosphorus content in the RGM was 0.78%, in which phytate content was 0.43% and non-phytate phosphorous was 0.35%, which is 44.87% of total phosphorous content. Hence, it can be concluded that RGM containing AME of 3031 kcal/kg, 50% crude protein with IVPP of 81.50% can prove to be a possible alternate feed source in the diet of poultry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akeson W R and Stahmann A. 1964. A pepsin pancreatin digest index of protein quality. Journal of Nutrition 83: 257–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/83.3.257

Annual Report (2019-2020). Directorate of Economics and Statistics. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delh AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 17th edn. Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.

Bandegan A, Guenter W, Hoehler D, Crow G H and Nyachoti C M. 2009. Standardized ileal amino acid digestibility in wheat distillers dried grains with solubles for broilers. Poultry Science 88(12): 2592–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00309

BIS. 2007. Nutrient Requirement for Poultry. IS: 9863 Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

Dinani O P, Tyagi P K, Mandal A B, Tyagi P K, Singh M, Wani M A and Dukare S P. 2018. Effect of feeding rice gluten meal on gut health, Immunity and intestinal histomorphometry in broilers. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences 7(4): 49–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.049

Dinani O P, Tyagi P K, Tyagi J S, Bhanja S K and Rokade J J. 2020. Effect of feeding rice gluten meal with and without enzymes on hemato-biochemical profile of broiler chickens. Veterinary World 13(10): 2062–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.2062-2069

Duncan D B. 1955. Multiple range and F tests. Biometrics 11: 1–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478

Farrell D J. 1999. In vivo and in vitro techniques for the assessment of the energy content of feed grains for poultry: A review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 881–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AR98173

Ghazi S, Rooke J A and Galbraith H. 2003. Improvement of the nutritive value of soybean meal by protease and a-galactosidase treatment in broiler cockerels and broiler chicks. British Poultry Science 44: 410–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660310001598283

Gopalkrishnan M V and Jamuna P. 2000. Optimum time requirement for enzymatic hydrolysis of food proteins. Journal of Food Science and Technology 37: 319–22.

Haugh W and Lantzsch H J. 1983. Sensitive method for the rapid determination of phytate in cereals and cereal products. Journal of Food Science and Agriculture 34: 1423–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740341217

Hill F W and Anderson D L. 1958. Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determination with the chicks. Journal of Nutrition 64: 587–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/64.4.587

Kumar R, Thakur S S and Mahesh M S. 2016. Rice gluten meal as an alternative by-product feed for growing dairy calves. Tropical Animal Health Production 48(3): 619–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1007-8

Mahesar S A, Sherazi S T H, Abdul N, Bhanger M I and Sirajuddin A R. 2010. Simultaneous assessment of zinc, cadmium, lead and copper in poultry feeds by differential pulse anodic striping voltammetry. Food and Chemical Toxicology 48: 2357–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.05.071

Martens D R. 2005. Rate and extent of digestion, pp. 13–47. Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion. 2nd edition. CABI International, Wallingford, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851998145.0013

Metwally A and Farahat M. 2015. Nutritive value and feeding of rice gluten meal in broiler chickens. Research Opinion in Animal and Veterinary Science 5(11): 443–51.

Morata R L, Tavernari F C and Vieira R A. 2008. Valoresnutricionais de algunsalimentosparafrangos de corte. Suplemento Revista Brasileira de CiênciaAvícola – Prêmio Lamas 10: 53.

Noblet J and Jaguelin-Peyraud Y. 2007. Prediction of digestibility of organic matter and energy in the growing pig from an in vitro model. Animal Feed Science and Technology 134: 211–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.07.008

O’Dell B L, Boland A R and Koirtyohann S R. 1972. Distribution of phytate and nutritionally important elements among the morphological components of cereal grains. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 20: 18–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60181a021

Peek H W, Vanderklis J D, Vermeulenc B and Landmana W J M. 2009. Dietary protease can alleviate negative effects of a coccidiosis infection on production performance in broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 150: 151–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.08.006

Pujol S and Torrallardona D. 2007. Evaluation of in vitro methods i. to estimate the in vivo nutrient digestibility of barley in pigs. Livestock Science 109: 186–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.01.143

Reddy N R, Sathe S K and Salunkhe D K. 1982. Phytases in legumes and cereals. Advances in Food Research 82: 1–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2628(08)60110-X

Sastry V R B, Kamra D N and Pathak N N. 1999. Laboratory Manual of Animal Nutrition. CAS, Division of Animal Nutrition.

Schroder B, Breve G and Rodehutscord M. 1996. Mechanisms of intestinal phosphorus absorption and availability of dietary phosphorus in pigs. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 103: 209–14.

Sheikh S A, Rokade J J, Wani M A, Shinde A S, Tyagi P K, Tyagi P K and Mandal B A. 2016. Utilization of decorticated cottonseed meal with or without protease in diets of broiler chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 86(4): 455–59.

Sibbald I R and Slinger S J. 1963. A biological assay for metabolizable energy in poultry feed ingredients together with findings which demonstrate some of the problems associated with the evaluation of fats. Poultry Science 42: 313–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0420313

Singh B, Kunze G and Satyanarayana T. 2011. Developments in biochemical aspects and biotechnological applications of microbial phytases. Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Review 6: 69–87.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1989. Statistical Methods. 7th edn. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi.

Talpatra S K, Roy S C and Sen K C. 1940. Estimation of phosphorus, chlorine, calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium in feed stuffs. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science 10: 243–58.

Van Soest P J and Wine R H. 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds and determination of plant cell wall constituents. Association of Official Analysts and Chemists 50: 50–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/50.1.50

Wani M A, Tyagi P K, Tyagi P K, Sheikh S A and Mandal B A. 2014. Effect of feeding different levels of decorticoid cotton seed meal on production performance, nutrient balances and economics in laying hens. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 49: 159–62.

Wodzinski R J and Ullah A H. 1996. Phytase. Advances in Applied Microbiology 42: 263–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2164(08)70375-7