Fertility of hybrids of dromedary and Bactrian camels: A possible role of conserved architecture of zinc finger domain of recombination regulator PRDM9


261 / 278

Authors

  • SONIKA AHLAWAT ICAR-National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • REKHA SHARMA ICAR-National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • REENA ARORA ICAR-National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • HIMANI SHARMA ICAR-National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • RENUKA SEHRAWAT ICAR-National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • ANNU SHARMA ICAR-National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • KARAN VEER SINGH ICAR-National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • RAMESH KUMAR VIJH ICAR-National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i12.112968

Keywords:

Bactrian, Camel, Dromedary, PRDM9, Recombination, Zinc finger

Abstract

Recombination regulator, PRDM9, has been regarded as the most rapidly evolving gene in the genomes of many metazoans, in addition to being acknowledged as the sole speciation gene in vertebrates. It has become the focus of many scientific investigations because of exceptional numerical and sequence variability in its zinc finger (ZF) domain within and across species that contributes to reproductive isolation between species. This study is the maiden attempt to explore the architecture of PRDM9 ZF domain in two Camelid species (Camelus dromedarius and Camelus bactrianus). Sequence analysis revealed highly conserved domain architecture with presence of 3 and 4 ZFs in dromedary and Bactrian camels, respectively. Typical evolutionary features of PRDM9 ZF domain i.e. concerted evolution and positive selection were invariably absent in both the one-humped dromedary and the two-humped Bactrian camels. Fertility of hybrids of dromedary and Bactrian camels, despite being taxonomically distinct species can be attributed to the lack of sequence variability in PRDM9 in these species. Phylogenetic analysis underpinned clear demarcation of camels from other livestock species. The results of the present study defy what has been learnt so far about PRDM9 and add to the enigma surrounding the most intriguing gene in the genome.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahlawat S, De S, Sharma P, Sharma R, Arora R, Kataria R S, Datta T K and Singh R K. 2017. Evolutionary dynamics of meiotic recombination hotspots regulator PRDM9 in bovids. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 292: 117–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-016-1260-6

Ahlawat S, Sharma P, Sharma R, Arora R and De S. 2016a. Zinc finger domain of the PRDM9 gene on chromosome 1 exhibits high diversity in ruminants but its paralog PRDM7 contains multiple disruptive mutations. PLoS ONE 11(5): e0156159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156159

Ahlawat S, Sharma P, Sharma R, Arora R, Verma N K, Brahma B, Mishra P and De S. 2016b. Evidence of positive selection and concerted evolution in the rapidly evolving PRDM9 zinc finger domain in goats and sheep. Animal Genetics 47: 740–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12487

Ali A, Baby B and Vijayan R. 2019. From Desert to Medicine: A review of camel genomics and therapeutic products. Frontiers in Genetics 10: 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00017

Axelsson E, Webster M T, Ratnakumar A, Ponting C P and Lindblad-Toh K. 2012. Death of PRDM9 coincides with stabilization of the recombination landscape in the dog genome. Genome Research 22: 51–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.124123.111

Baudat F, Buard J, Grey C, Fledel-Alon A, Ober C, Przeworski M, Coop G and de Massy B. 2010. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327: 836–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183439

Baudat F, Imai Y and de Massy B. 2013. Meiotic recombination in mammals: localization and regulation. Nature Reviews Genetics 14: 794–806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3573

Buard J, Rivals E, Dunoyer de Segonzac D, Garres C, Caminade P, de Massy B and Boursot P. 2014. Diversity of PRDM9 zinc finger array in wild mice unravels new facets of the evolutionary turnover of this coding minisatellite. PLoS One 9: e85021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085021

Burger P A, Ciani E and Faye B. 2019. Old World camels in a modern world – a balancing act between conservation and genetic improvement. Animal Genetics doi: 10.1111/ age.12858.

Dioli M. 2020. Dromedary (Camelus dromedarius) and Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus) crossbreeding husbandry practices in Turkey and Kazakhstan: An in-depth review. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice 10: 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13570-020-0159-3

Groeneveld L F, Atencia R, Garriga R M and Vigilant L. 2012. High diversity at PRDM9 in chimpanzees and bonobos. PLoS One 7: e39064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039064

Hall T A. 1999. BIOEDIT: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.

Jirimutu, Wang Z, Ding G, Chen G, Sun Y, Sun Z et al. 2012. Genome sequences of wild and domestic bactrian camels. Nature Communications 3: 1202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2192

Mihola O, Trachtulec Z, Vlcek C, Schimenti J C and Forejt J. 2009. A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science 323: 373–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163601

Myers S, Bowden R, Tumian A, Bontrop R E, Freeman C, MacFie T S, McVean G and Donnelly P. 2010. Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science 327: 876–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182363

Oliver P L, Goodstadt L, Bayes J J, Birtle Z, Roach K C, Phadnis N, Beatson S A, Lunter G, Malik H S and Ponting C P. 2009. Accelerated evolution of the PRDM9 speciation gene across diverse metazoan taxa. PLoS Genetics 5: e1000753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000753

Ponting C P. 2011. What are the genomic drivers of the rapid evolution of PRDM9? Trends in Genetics 27(5): 165–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2011.02.001

Sambrook J, Fritsch E F and Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, New York.

Satyanarayana D S, Ahlawat S, Sharma R, Arora R, Sharma A, Tantia M S and Vijh R K. 2022. Mitochondrial DNA diversity divulges high levels of haplotype diversity and lack of genetic structure in the Indian camels. Gene 820: 146279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2022.146279

Sharma R, Ahlawat S, Sharma H, Prakash V, Shilpa, Khatak S, Sawal R K and Tantia M S. 2020. Identification of a new Indian camel germplasm by microsatellite markers based genetic diversity and population structure of three camel populations. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 27: 1699–1709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.04.046

Sharma R, Sharma H, Ahlawat S, Aggarwal R A K, Vij P K and Tantia M S. 2018. First attempt on somatic cell cryopreservation of critically endangered Camelus bactrianus of India. Gene Reports 10: 109–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2017.11.007

Steiner C C and Ryder O A. 2013. Characterization of PRDM9 in equids and sterility in mules. PLoS One 8: e61746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061746

Stothard P. 2000. The sequence manipulation suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. BioTechniques 8: 1102–04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2144/00286ir01

Tamura K and Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 512–26.

Tillib S V, Vyatchanin A S and Muyldermans S. 2014. Molecular analysis of heavy chain-only antibodies of Camelus bactrianus. Biochemistry 79: 1382–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S000629791412013X

Downloads

Submitted

2021-07-23

Published

2022-12-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

AHLAWAT, S., SHARMA, R., ARORA, R., SHARMA, H., SEHRAWAT, R., SHARMA, A., SINGH, K. V., & VIJH, R. K. (2022). Fertility of hybrids of dromedary and Bactrian camels: A possible role of conserved architecture of zinc finger domain of recombination regulator PRDM9. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 92(12), 1399–1403. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i12.112968
Citation