PCR based method for authentication of pork in raw and processed products as well as in binary meat mixtures
340 / 248
Keywords:
Binary meat mixture, Meat authentication, Polymerase chain reaction, Processed pork product, Raw porkAbstract
In this study, amplification of species-specific marker of mitochondrial DNA origin was carried out to detect pork in raw, processed and meat mixtures containing varying concentrations of pork, viz. 1, 10, 50, 75 and 100%. The species-specific marker for pork was tested in raw pork from different breeds/varieties of pig such as Hampshire, Yorkshire, Ghungroo, Duroc, Rani, and Asha. The size of the amplified product was 290 bp in all the breeds/ varieties. The results were consistent in processed pork products, viz. frankfurter sausage, salami, cocktail sausage, pork slice, ham, and pork curry which were subjected to different cooking temperatures ranging from 75 to 121°C. In case of all the mixtures with different concentrations of pork, similar results were observed. Subsequently, this marker was tested for cross-amplification by checking them with beef, carabeef, mutton, chevon, chicken, and duck meat and no amplification was observed. The results suggested that the DNA marker used in this study is highly species-specific and reliable to detect pork adulteration, unambiguously, in raw, processed as well as in meat mixtures containing pork. This technique is rapid, simple and economical as compared to other methods of pork adulteration detection.Downloads
References
Arvanitoyannis I S and Van Houwelingen-Koukaliaroglou M. 2003. Implementation of chemometrics for quality control and authentication of meat and meat products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 43: 173–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690390826482
Buntjer J B, Nijman I J, Zijlstra C and Lenstra J A. 1998. A satellite DNA element specific for roe deer. Chromosoma 107: 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004120050276
Calvo J H, Zaragoza P and Osta R. 2001. Random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprints for identification of species in poultry pate. Poultry Science 80: 522–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.4.522
Chikuni K, Ozustume K, Hoishi Kawa T and Kato S. 1990. Species identification of cooked meats by DNA hybridization assay. Meat Science 27: 199–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(90)90060-J
Dalmasso A E, Fontanella P, Piatti T, Civera S, Rosati K and Bottero M T. 2004. A multiplex PCR assay for the identification of animal species in feedstuffs. Molecular and Cellular Probes 18: 81–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2003.09.006
Forrest A R R and Carnegie P R. 1994. Identification of gourmet using FINS (forensically informative nucleotide sequencing). Biotechniques 17: 24–26.
Gardner E J and Snustad D P. 1984. Principles of genetics (7th edition). John Wiley and Sons: New York.
Girish P S, Anjaneyulu A S R, Biswas K N, Anand M, Rajkumar N, Shivakumar B M and Sarma B. 2004. Sequence analysis of mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene can identify meat species. Meat Science 66: 551–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00158-X
Girish P S, Anjaneyulu A S R, Biswas K N, Shivakumar B M, Anand M, Patel M and Sarma B. 2005. Meat species identification by polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism of mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene. Meat Science 70: 107–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.12.004
Haunshi S, Basumatary R, Girish P S, Doley S, Bardoloi R K and Kumar A. 2009. Identification of chicken, duck, pigeon and pig meat by species-specific markers of mitochondrial origin. Meat Science 83: 454–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.06.026
Hopwood A J, Fairbrother K S, Lockley A K and Bardsley R G. 1999. An actin gene-related polymerase chain reaction test for identification of chicken in meat mixtures. Meat Science 53: 227–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00060-1
Ilhak O I and Arslan A. 2007. Identification of meat species by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science 31: 159–63.
Koh M C, Lim C H, Chua S B, Chew S T and Phang S T W. 1998. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprints for identification of red meat animal species. Meat Science 48: 275–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00104-6
Mane B G, Mendiratta S K, Tiwari A K and Narayan R. 2013. Sequence analysis of mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene to identify meat species. Journal of Applied Animal Research 41: 77–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2012.738213
Murphy J, Armour J and Blais B W. 2007. Research note: Cloth- based hybridization array system for expanded identification
of the animal species origin of derived materials in feeds. Journal of Food Protection 70: 2900–05.
Rastogi G R, Dharne M S, Walujkar S, Kumar A, Patole M S and Shouche Y S. 2007. Species identification and authentication of tissues of animal origin using mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Meat Science 76: 666–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.02.006
Sambrook J and Russell D W. 2001. Molecular Cloning – A Laboratory Manual (3rdedition), pp. 32–68. New York: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press.
Teixeira L V, Teixeira C S, Bastianetto E and Oliveira D A A. 2007. A buffalo meat products certification by DNA test. Italian Journal of Animal Science 6: 1207–09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.s2.1207
Unseld M, Beyermann B, Brandt P and Hiesel R. 1995. Identification of the species origin of highly processed meat products by mitochondrial DNA sequences. PCR Methods and Applications 4: 241–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.4.4.241
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.