Dynamics of productivity growth in Indian dairy products manufacturing industry


329 / 201

Authors

  • SHIV KUMAR ICAR–National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012 India
  • ABDULLA ABDULLA ICAR–National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v91i2.113822

Keywords:

Dairy, Growth, Processing, Productivity

Abstract

The study assesses the total factor productivity of dairy products manufacturing industry of the year 2009–13 using stochastic frontier production approach. The study concludes that the change in total value of output of industry is due to adoption of efficient and best practices by processors. The TFP growth of dairy industry is 4.3% mainly driven by technical change over time. Temporarily, the dairy industry is moving towards overcoming the constraints in TFP growth. There is more need to augment capital which is energy efficient and accordingly capacity building of emerging skill sets in the industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aigner D, C A Knox Lovell and Peter Schmidt. 1977. Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models. Journal of Econometrics 6(1): 21–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5

ASCI. 2015. Report on Dairy Sector (Agriculture Skill Council of India).

Barkema A and L P Schertz. 1994. New Roles and Alliances in the U.S. Food System. Food and agricultural markets: The Quiet Revolution.

Battese, George E and Tim J. Coelli. 1988. Prediction of Firm- Level Technical Efficiencies with a Generalized Frontier Production Function and Panel Data. Journal of Econometrics 38(3): 387–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(88)90053-X

Coelli, Timothy J, D S Prasada Rao, Christopher J O’Donnell and George E. Battese. 2005. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Connor John M and William A. Schiek. 1997. Food Processing: An Industrial Powerhouse in Transition. 2nd ed. New York, United States: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

DAHDF. 2019. Annual Report 2018–19, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare.

FSSAI. 2008. Toxicological Reference Values and Food Legislation.

King, Robert P and Paul F. Phumpiu. 1996. Reengineering the Food Supply Chain: The ECR Initiative in the Grocery Industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(5): 1181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1243488

Knoeber Charles R. 1989. A Real Game of Chicken: Contracts, Tournaments, and the Production of Broilers. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 5(2): 271–92.

Kumbhakar, Wang H J and Horncastle A P. 2015a. A Practitioner’s Guide to Stochastic Frontier Analysis Using Stata. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kumbhakar, Wang H J and Horncastle A P. 2015b. A Practitioner’s Guide to Stochastic Frontier Analysis Using Stata. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342070

Ménard Claude and Peter G. Klein. 2004. “Organizational Issues in the Agrifood Sector: Toward a Comparative Approach.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00619.x

Reinert Erik S. 2009. Economic & Social Affairs. The Terrible Simplifers/: Common Origins of Financial Crises and Persistent Poverty in Economic Theory and the New ‘1848 Moment’ Thornton Philip K. 2010. “Livestock Production: Recent Trends, Future Prospects.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365(1554): 2853–67.

Van Den Broeck, Julien, Gary Koop, Jacek Osiewalski, and Mark F.J. Steel. 1994. “Stochastic Frontier Models. A Bayesian Perspective.” Journal of Econometrics 61(2): 273–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)90087-6

Downloads

Submitted

2021-08-12

Published

2021-08-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMAR, S., & ABDULLA, A. (2021). Dynamics of productivity growth in Indian dairy products manufacturing industry. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 91(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v91i2.113822
Citation