An improved methodology for efficient isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from Caprine bone marrow

JUHI PATHAK; SURESH DINKAR KHARCHE; ANUJ KUMAR SINGH SIKARWAR; DAYANIDHI JENA; SHIVA PRATAP SINGH; RAVI RANJAN

doi:10.56093/ijans.v91i4.114334

Authors

JUHI PATHAK ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Uttar Pradesh 281 122 India
SURESH DINKAR KHARCHE ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Uttar Pradesh 281 122 India
ANUJ KUMAR SINGH SIKARWAR ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Uttar Pradesh 281 122 India
DAYANIDHI JENA ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Uttar Pradesh 281 122 India
SHIVA PRATAP SINGH ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Uttar Pradesh 281 122 India
RAVI RANJAN ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Uttar Pradesh 281 122 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v91i4.114334

Keywords:

Bone marrow, Caprine, Histopaque, Mesenchymal stem cell

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of increasing volume of bone marrow (BM) aspirate of goats on yield of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). For this, yield of MSCs in seven groups (Gr; 1-7 Grs, including a control Gr) were compared. After isolation and enrichment of BM MSCs with density gradient centrifugation using increasing volume of Histopaque-1077, the properties of MSCs to adhere the plastic surfaces and expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were used for the identification of MSCs. The results indicated that 18 ml of BM aspirate (Gr 5) provided maximum number of MSCs using 3 ml of histopaque compared to the control and other Gr. The yield in Gr 5 was about 4.4 folds higher compared to the control Gr. In conclusion, these results demonstrated that in a single procedure the modified protocol yield significantly higher number of caprine MSCs from goat BM aspirate compared to the standard protocol. Thus, it can be used for isolation of more number of MSCs from a large quantity of bone marrow with least volume of consumables required for density-gradient centrifugation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D et al. 2006. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 8: 315– 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14653240600855905

Hanna H, Mir L M and Andre F M. 2018. In vitro osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells generates cell layers with distinct properties. Stem cell Research and Therapy 9(1): 203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0942-x

Kharche S D, Goel A K, Jindal S K, Ranjan R, Rout P K, Agarwal S K, Goel P, Saraswat S, Vijh R K, Malakar D, Bag S, Srkhel B and Bhanja S K. 2014. Development of parthenote following in vivo transfer of embryos in Capra hircus. In vitro Cell Developmental Biology—Animal 50: 893–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-014-9740-7

Nadri S, Soleimani M, Hosseni R H, Massumi M, Atashi A and Izadpanah R. 2007. An efficient method for isolation of murine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. International Journal of Developmental Biology 51: 723–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.072352ns

Pierini M, Dozza B, Lucarelli E, Tazzari P L, Ricci F, Remondini D, di Bella C, Giannini S and Donati D. 2012. Efficient isolation and enrichment of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow. Cytotherapy 14(6): 686–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14653249.2012.677821

Ullah I, Subbarao R B and Rho G J. 2015. Human mesenchymal stem cells - current trends and future prospective. Bioscience Reports 35:e00191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20150025