Microsatellite markers based genetic diversity and differentiation of Balangir goat population of Odisha


Abstract views: 117 / PDF downloads: 86

Authors

  • REKHA SHARMA BAIF, Uruli Kanchan, Maharashtra 412 202 India
  • SONIKA AHLAWAT BAIF, Uruli Kanchan, Maharashtra 412 202 India
  • JAYANT KHADSE BAIF, Uruli Kanchan, Maharashtra 412 202 India
  • DHIRAJ KUMAR SONAWANE BAIF, Uruli Kanchan, Maharashtra 412 202 India
  • RAK AGGARWAL BAIF, Uruli Kanchan, Maharashtra 412 202 India
  • M S TANTIA BAIF, Uruli Kanchan, Maharashtra 412 202 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v91i6.115451

Keywords:

Balangir goat, Bottleneck, Diversity, Inbreeding, Microsatellite, Odisha

Abstract

This study was executed to investigate the genetic diversity of Balangir, a local goat population from Odisha, and its differentiation from the geographically closest registered goat breeds, Ganjam and Black Bengal by utilizing 22 polymorphic microsatellite markers. The genotypic status of individuals at each locus was identified by an automated DNA sequencer and allelic data was analyzed for genetic diversity parameters. It resulted in the acquisition of original and comparable information confirming the genetic distinctness of the Balangir goat population. The observed number of alleles varied between 4 (RM4) and 16 (OMHC1) with 8.23±0.64 alleles per locus in Balangir goats. A moderate level of observed heterozygosity (0.57±0.05) indicated sufficiently existing genetic diversity in this goat population which varied between 0.09 (OarJMP29) and 1 (ILSTS22). Expected heterozygosity (0.64±0.04) oscillated between 0.18 (ILSTS34) and 0.89 (OMHC1). Within the population, heterozygosity deficiency estimate (FIS) was significantly positive (0.13±0.05) and 73% of the investigated loci contributed towards the homozygote excess. Consequently, significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was observed at 12 of 22 analyzed loci. Assessment of Balangir goat population for mutation drift equilibrium indicated that the population did not suffer a reduction in effective population size in the last few generations. Four different approaches utilized to study genetic relationships (F statistics, analysis of molecular variance, phylogenetic relationship genetic distance, and individual assignment) indicated that the Balangir goat population was genetically differentiated from the two registered goat breeds. The study highlighted that Balangir is discrete Indian goat germplasm with sufficient genetic variability and needs to be registered as a goat breed of India.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

th Livestock Census. All India Report 2012. Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi.

Bhat Z I, Kuralkar S V, Kharkar K And Kuralkar P. 2013. Genetic analysis of Osmanabadi goat breed. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83(7): 768–71.

Cornuet J M and Luikart G. 1996. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144: 2001–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/144.4.2001

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) 2011. Draft Guidelines on Phenotypic Characterization. Intergovernmental Technical Working Group on Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Rome, p 87.

Joshi M B, Rout P K, Mandal A K, Smith C T, Singh L and Thangaraj K. 2004. Phylogeography and origin of Indian domestic goats. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21(3): 454–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msh038

Fig. 3. Population assignment of individual animals of three Indian goat populations. Kharkar K, Kuralkar S V and Kuralkar P. 2015. Molecular genetic characterization of Berari breed of goat using microsatellite markers. Indian Journal of Animal Research 49(4): 423–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0555.2015.00136.3

Luikart G, Allendorf F W, Cornuet J M and Sherwin W B. 1998. Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. Journal of Heredity 89: 238–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/89.3.238

MacHugh D E and Bradley D G. 2001. Livestock genetic origins: goats buck the trend. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 9: 5382–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.111163198

Mishra P, Verma N K, Aggarwal R A K and Dixit S P. 2010. Breed characteristics and genetic variability in Changthangi goats. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80(12): 1203–09.

Nath S, Kuralkar S V, Khan W, Kharkar K and Kuralkar P. 2014. Genetic diversity analysis of Sangamneri goat. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 84(2): 212–15.

Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106: 283–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/282771

Paim T D P, Faria D A, Hay E H, McManus C, Lanari M R, Esquivel L C, Cascante M I, Alfaro E J, Mendez A, Faco O, Silva K M, Mezzadra C A, Mariante A, Paiva S R and Blackburn H D. 2019. New world goat populations are a genetically diverse reservoir for future use. Science Reports 9(1): 1476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38812-3

Peakall R and Smouse P E. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and researchan update. Bioinformatics 28: 2537–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460

Raghavendra C, Saireddy S, Amareswari P and Raghunandan T. 2017. Molecular characterization of Mahabubnagar goats based on microsatellite markers. Pharma Innovation Journal 6(5): 130–33.

Sambrook J and Russell D. 2001. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (M). 3rd Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York

Sharma R, Kishore A, Mukesh M, Ahlawat S, Maitra A, Pandey A K and Tantia M S. 2015. Genetic diversity and relationship of Indian cattle inferred from microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. BMC Genetics 16: 73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0221-0

Shivahre P R, Verma N K, Aggarwal R A K, Sharma R, Dangi P S, Bhutia N T and Ahlawat S. 2017. Microsatellite based genetic diversity estimation in Sikkim Singharey goat population. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 87(1): 125–27.

Singh G, Thakur Y, Kour A, Sankhyan V and Katoch S. 2015. Genetic characterization of Gaddi goat breed of Western Himalayas using microsatellite markers. Veterinary World EISSN: 2231–0916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.527-531

Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M and Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1596–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm092

Tantia M S, Vij P K, Yathish H M, Kulkarni V S, Shettar V B, Gopala G T, Sharma H and Sharma R. 2018. Characterization of Nandidurga and Bidri goat populations of Karnataka. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 88(9): 1058–63.

Verma N K, Aggarwal R A K, Shivahre P R, Sharma R and Savino N. 2019. Evaluation of genetic diversity in long hair Nagaland goat Sumi-Ne. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 89(1): 105–09.

Vijh R K, Tantia M S, Behl R and Mishra B. 2010. Genetic architecture of Black Bengal and Chegu goats. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80(11): 1134–37.

Zaman G U, Nahardeka N, Laskar S, Ferdoci A M and Chetri A J. 2013. Molecular characterization of Assam hill goat. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences 8(2): 98–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2013.98.103

Downloads

Submitted

2021-09-16

Published

2021-09-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SHARMA, R., AHLAWAT, S., KHADSE, J., SONAWANE, D. K., AGGARWAL, R., & TANTIA, M. S. (2021). Microsatellite markers based genetic diversity and differentiation of Balangir goat population of Odisha. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 91(6), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v91i6.115451
Citation