Effect of flooring system on maintenance behaviours of cows

DEEPAK UPADHYAY; MUKESH SINGH; GYANENDRA KUMAR GAUR; PANCH KISHOR BHARTI; MED RAM VERMA

doi:10.56093/ijans.v91i8.115929

Authors

DEEPAK UPADHYAY ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
MUKESH SINGH ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
GYANENDRA KUMAR GAUR ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
PANCH KISHOR BHARTI ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
MED RAM VERMA ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v91i8.115929

Keywords:

Behaviour, Floor, Lying, Rubber mat, Sand bed, Welfare

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of floor on maintenance behaviours of cow in loose housing system, four groups, viz. T0 (concrete in covered and brick-paved in open area), T1 (concrete in covered and sand bed in open), T2 (rubber mat in covered and sand bed in open) and T3 (rubber mat in covered and brick-paved in open) were studied. Feeding was the major activity (39â€“44%) of day, with significant difference between groups. In covered area, lying and standing rumination, while in open area idling, were significantly different between groups during day. During night lying-rumination was major activity (62â€“69%). Night idling, standing-rumination, lying and lying-rumination behaviour, were significantly different between groups. Overall most of the time in each group was devoted to lying-rumination (45â€“53%) and feeding (18â€“21%). Area wise, open area was more occupied and posture wise sitting posture dominated in all the groups. Overall feeding, idling and standing-rumination in open, lying-rumination (in open or covered area), sleeping, total standing time and total sitting time were significantly different between groups. Feeding time showed positive trend in rubber matted floor (T2, T3). More lying-rumination and sleeping time was seen in rubber matted covered area. Sand bedding in open area reduced the standing and standingrumination activity, while promoting the sitting/lying time. Rubber matting in covered area and sand bedding in open area, was found favourable for maintenance behaviour of dairy cows.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2019. Annual report (2018–19). Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of

Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. Pp 192.

Bicalho R C and Oikonomou G. 2013. Control and prevention of lameness associated with claw lesions in dairy cows. Livestock Science 156: 96–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.06.007

Blowey R. 1994. Dairy cow housing. Livestock Housing. pp. 428. (Eds) Wathes C M and Charles D R. CAB International, Wallingford, UK,

Boyle L, Mee J, O’Donovan M and Kiernan P. 2005. Welfare and health of dairy cattle on outwintering pads or in cubicle housing with or without cushioned flooring. Project report. RMIS No. 5139 Teagasc, Dairy Production Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork (www.teagasc.ie/research/reports/dairyproduction/5139/eopr-5139.asp.)

Chapinal N, de Passillé A M, Weary D M, von Keyserlingk M A G and Rushen J. 2009. Using gait score, walking speed, and lying behavior to detect hoof lesions in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 4365–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2115

Chaplin S J, Tierney G, Stockwell C, Logue D N and Kelly M. 2000. An evaluation of mattresses and mats in two dairy units. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66: 263–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00100-8

Cook N B, Bennett T B and Nordlund K V. 2004. Effect of free stall surface on daily activity patterns in dairy cows with DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73422-0

relevance to lameness prevalence. Journal of Dairy Science 87: 2912–22.

Cooper M D, Arney D R and Phillips C J C. 2007. Two- or fourhour lying deprivation on the behavior of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 1149–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71601-6

Dechamps P, Nicks B, Canart B, Gielen M and Istasse L. 1989. A note on resting behaviour of cows before and after calving in two different housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 99–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(89)90010-5

DeVries T J, von Keyserlingk M A G and Beauchemin K A. 2003. Short Communication: Diurnal feeding pattern of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 56: 4079–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74020-X

Drissler M, Gaworski M, Tucker C B and Weary D M. 2005. Freestall maintenance: Effects on lying behaviour of dairy DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72916-7

cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 88: 2381–87.

Espejo L A, Endres M I and Salfer J. 2006. Prevalence of lameness in high-producing Holstein cows housed in freestall DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72579-6

barns in Minnesota. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 3052–58.

Feddes J, Robinson B and Borg R. 1995. Building for cow comfort. (Ed) Kennelly J. Proceedings of the 1995 Western

Canadian Dairy Seminar; Alberta. (http://www.afns.ualberta.ca/wcds/wcd95067.htm).

Fisher A D, Stewart M, Verkerk G A, Morrow C J and Matthews L R. 2003. The effects of surface type on lying behaviour and stress responses of dairy cows during periodic weather-induced removal from pasture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81: 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00240-X

Fregonesi J A and Leaver J D. 2002. Influence of space allowance and milk yield level on behaviour, performance and health of dairy cows housed in strawyard and cubicle systems. Livestock Production Science 78: 245–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00097-0

Fregonesi J A, Tucker C B, Weary D M, Flower F C and Vittie T. 2004. Effect of rubber flooring in front of the feed bunk on the behavior of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 87: 1203–07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73270-1

Gibb M J, Huckle C A and Nuthall R. 1998. Effect of time of day on grazing behaviour by lactating dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 53: 41–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.1998.00102.x

Gomez A and Cook N B. 2010. Time budgets of lactating dairy cattle in commercial freestall herds. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 5772–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3436

Haley D B, de Passille A M and Rushen J. 2001. Assessing cow comfort: Effects of two floor types and two tie stall designs on the behaviour of lactating dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71: 105–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00175-1

Haley D B, Rushen J and de Passillé A M. 2000. Behavioural indicators of cow comfort: Activity and resting behaviour of dairy cows in two types of housing. Canadian Journal of Animal Sciences 80: 257–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/A99-084

John A J, Garcia S C, Kerrisk K L, Freeman M J, Islam M R and Clark C E F. 2017. The diurnal intake and behavior of dairy cows when access to a feed of consistent nutritive value is restricted. Journal of Dairy Science 100 (11): 9279–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12245

Krohn C C, Munksgaard L and Jonasen B. 1992. Behavior of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose housing/pasture) or

intensive (tie stall) environments I. Experimental procedure, facilities, time budgets- diurnal and seasonal conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34: 37–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80055-3

Madke P K, Lathwal S S, Singh Y, Kumar A and Kaushik V. 2010. Study of behavioural and physiological changes of

crossbred cows under different shelter management practices. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80(8): 771–74.

Miller R and Wood-Gush D G M. 1991. Some effects of housing on the social behaviour of dairy cows. Animal Production 53: 271–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100020262

Munksgaard L, Jensen M B, Pedersen L J, Hansen S W and Matthews L. 2005. Quantifying behavioural priorities – effects of time constraints on behaviour of dairy cows, Bos taurus. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92: 3–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.005

Phillips C J C and Leaver J D. 1986. The effect of forage supplementation on the behaviour of grazing dairy cows. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(86)90116-4

Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16(3): 233–47.

Phillips C J C and Morris I D. 2000. The locomotion of dairy cows on concrete floors that are dry, wet, or covered with a slurry of excreta. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 1767–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75047-8

Pullin A N, Pairis-Garcia M D, Campler M R and Proudfoot K L. 2017. Validation of scan sampling techniques for behavioural observations of pastured lambs. Animal Welfare 26: 185–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.26.2.185

Randhawa S S. 2006. ‘Prevalence, biomechanics, pathogenesis and clinico-therapeutic studies on foot lameness in dairy animals’. PhD Thesis, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, India.

Rushen J and de Passillé A M. 2006. Effects of roughness and compressibility of flooring on cow locomotion. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 2965–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72568-1

Rushen J, Haley D and DePassillé A M. 2007. Effect of softer flooring in tie stalls on resting behavior and leg injuries of DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-463

lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 3647–51.

Rushen J A, de Passillé M and Haley D B. 1998. The effects on productivity, health, and behaviour of housing lactating dairy cows in NRI “Cloud 9” rubber mats. Report to NRI Cloud 9 Mats.

Sahu D, Mandal D K, Dar A H, Podder M and Gupta A. 2019. Modification in housing system affects the behavior and

welfare of dairy Jersey crossbred cows in different seasons. Biological Rhythm Research https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2019.1619130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2019.1619130

Schirmann K, Chapinal N, Weary D M, Heuwieser W and von Keyserlingk M A G. 2012. Rumination and its relationship to feeding and lying behavior in Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 3212–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4741

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. Ninth Edition, Iowa State University Press.

Sonck B, Darlemans J and Langenakens J. 1999. Preference test for free stall surface material for dairy cows. ASAE/CSAESCGR Annual International Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Paper No: 994011.

Sood P and Nanda A S. 2013. Lameness in crossbred cows: Prevalence, host level risk factors and reproductive

performance. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83(4): 379–82

Stefanowska J, Swierstra D, Braam C R and Hen-driks M M W B. 2001. Cow behaviour on a new grooved floor in comparison with slatted floor, taking claw health and floor properties into account. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71: 87–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00180-5

Ternman E, Hänninen L, Pastell M, Agenäs S and Nielsen P P. 2012. Sleep in dairy cows recorded with a non-invasive EEG technique. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 140(1–2): 25–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.05.005

Tucker C B, Zdanowicz G and Weary D M. 2006. Brisket boards reduce freestall use. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 2603–07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72337-2

Webster J. 1994. Comfort and Injury, pp. 49–68. (Eds) Wathes C M and Charles D R. Livestock Housing. CAB International, Wallingford UK (1994).

Wechsler B, Schaub J, Friedli K and Hauser R. 2000. Behaviour and leg injuries in dairy cows kept in cubicle systems with straw bedding or soft lying mats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69: 189–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00134-9