Influence of urea molasses mineral blocks having bentonite as binder on the feed intake, nutrient utilization and economics of feeding of crossbred calves


Abstract views: 269 / PDF downloads: 150

Authors

  • V SANKAR ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • PUTAN SINGH ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh
  • A K PATIL College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Dr BR Ambedkar University of Social Sciences, Madhya Pradesh
  • A K VERMA ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh
  • ASIT DAS ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v91i9.116462

Keywords:

Bentonite, Crossbred calves, Economics, Nutrient utilization, Urea molasses mineral blocks

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effect of supplementation of urea mineral molasses block (UMMB) containing variable levels of urea and bentonite on nutrient utilization and economics of feeding of crossbred calves. Twenty four male crossbred calves were divided into four equal groups following completely randomized design and fed individually for 120 days. In Group 1, 70% of crude protein (CP) requirement was met through feeding of concentrate mixture and remaining CP was supplied through UMMB and ad lib. wheat straw (control). In Groups 2, 3 and 4, the feeding regimen followed was same as that of control except that UMMB was replaced with UMMB-A, UMMB-B, UMMB-C which vary in physical composition (wheat bran, urea, cement and bentonite content). There was no significant difference in feed intake and digestibility of macro-nutrients among the groups. Intake of UMMB was significantly lower in Group 4 as compared to the other groups. The nitrogen and phosphorus intake, excretion and retention was non-significant among the groups. A significant increase in calcium intake in Group 1 was observed. The excretion of calcium through faeces and calcium balance was non-significant among the groups. The feeding cost per kg bodyweight gain (`) was higher in Group 1 followed by 3, 2 and 4, respectively. On basis of present results, it may be concluded that supplementation of UMMB containing 15% urea and 10% cement can replace 30% crude protein of concentrate mixture without any adverse effect on feed intake, digestibility and nutrient utilization of crossbred calves.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ankita, Verma A K, Singh P, Das A and Gaur G K. 2016. Effect of replacement of concentrate mixture with a multi-nutrient liquid supplement on performance of bufflao heifers. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 86: 1036–40.

Ankita, Verma A K, Singh P and Das A. 2018. Effect of multinutrient liquid supplement on serum minerals and hormone profile in buffalo heifers. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 88: 453–57.

AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C., USA.

Choubey M, Wadhwa M and Bakshi M P S. 2015. Evaluation of urea molasses multinutrient blocks containing alternate feed resources in buffaloes. Buffalo Bulletin 34: 5–16.

Dutta N, Sharma K, Pattanaik A K and Singh M. 2009. Effect of strategic feeding of urea treated cereals straws supplemented with agricultural by products on the performance of growing buffalo calves and heifers. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 9:185–93.

Geleta T, Negesse T, Abebe G and Goetsch A L. 2013. Effect of supplementing grazing Arsi-Bale sheep with molasses-urea feed block on weight gain and economic return under farmers’ management condition. Journal of Cell and Animal Biology 7:125–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JCAB11.030

Ivan M, Dayrell M De Se, Mahadeven S and Hidiroglou M. 1992. Effect of bentonite on wool growth and nitrogen metabolism in fauna – free and faunated sheep. Journal of Animal Science 70: 3194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70103194x

Koster H H, Cochran R C, Titgemeyer E C, Vanzant E S, Nagaraja T G, Kreikemeier K K and St Jean G. 1997. Effect of increasing proportion of supplemental nitrogen from urea on intake and utilization of low-quality, tallgrass-prairie forage by beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 75: 1393–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.7551393x

Kumari P, Singh P, Verma A K, Gaur G K and Das A. 2019a. Effect of molasses based multi-nutrient herbal supplements on the performance of buffalo calves. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 89: 871–75.

Kumari P, Singh P, Verma A K, Gaur G K and Das A. 2019b. Effect of molasses based multi-nutrient herbal supplements on hematobiochemicals, serum lipid, antioxidants and hormonal profile in buffalo calves. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 89: 1356–62.

Kunju P J G. 1986. Urea molasses block lick: A future animal feed supplement. Asian Livestock 11: 154–59.

Lohakare J D, Pattanaik A K and Khan S A. 2006. Effect of dietary protein levels on the performance, nutrient balances, metabolic profile and thyroid hormones of crossbred calves. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 19: 1588–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1588

Magnoli A P, Monge M P, Miazzo R D, Cavaglieri L R, Magnoli C E, Merkis C I, Cristofolini A L, Dalcero A M and Chiacchiera S M. 2010. Effect of low levels of aflatoxin B1 on performance, biochemical parameters, and aflatoxin B1 in broiler liver tissues in the presence of monensin and sodium bentonite. Poultry Science 90: 48–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00971

Patil A K, Verma A K, Singh P and Das A. 2019. Effect of molasses based multi-nutrient supplement containing chromium on nutrient utilization, milk yield, and microbial protein flow and antioxidant status of lactating Murrah buffaloes. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 36: 122–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6744.2019.00022.7

Ranjhan S K. 1998. Nutrient Requirement of Livestock and Poultry. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)

Publication, New Delhi, India.

Roy A, Tiwari S P, Sahu T, Naik S K and Doneria R. 2014. Medicated urea molasses mineral block and tannin on growth

performance, nutrient utilization and nematodosis in goat kids. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 84: 549–53.

Sahoo B, Vishwanath C, Bhushan J, Kwatra and Agarwal A. 2009. Effect of urea molasses mineral block supplementation on milk production of cows in mid hills of Uttarakhand. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 9: 171–78.

Salem F A F, El-Amary H and Hassanin S H. 2001. Effect of bentonite supplementation on nutrients digestibility, rumen fermentation, some blood physiological parameters and performance of growing lambs. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds 4: 179–91.

Talapatra S K, Ray S C and Sen K C. 1940. Estimation of P, Cl, Ca, Na, and K in food stuffs. Indian Journal of Veterinary

Science and Animal Husbandry 10: 243.

Tiwari S P, Kumari K, Mishra U K, Gendley M K and Gupta R. 2008. Effect of substituting concentrate mixture by urea molasses mineral block on protozoal production rates in Murrah buffalo calves. Livestock Research for Rural Development 20:11.

Tripathi N K, Pathak S K and Sharma V K. 2006. An on-farm evaluation of urea-molasses-mineral brick feeding for the milk production of cattle and buffaloes. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 6: 251–55.

Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A. 1991. Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism and nutritional implication in Dairy cattle. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

Wadhwa M and Bakshi M P S. 2014. Nutritional evaluation of urea molasses multi-nutrient blocks containing agro-industrial wastes in buffaloes. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 84(5): 544–48.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-10-05

Published

2021-10-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SANKAR, V., SINGH, P., PATIL, A. K., VERMA, A. K., & DAS, A. (2021). Influence of urea molasses mineral blocks having bentonite as binder on the feed intake, nutrient utilization and economics of feeding of crossbred calves. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 91(9), 733–737. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v91i9.116462
Citation