Effect of floor types and seasons on behavioural activities of Surti goats
537 / 290
Keywords:
Behaviour, Floor, Goat, Season, SurtiAbstract
Present study was conducted to assess effect of floor types on behaviour of Surti goats under stall-feeding system in cold, hot dry and hot humid seasons. Adult dry Surti goats (27) were divided randomly on body weight (20-30 kg) basis in three treatment groups (T1: earthen floor, T2: brick floor and T3: cement concrete floor). In each treatment, six goats were selected for behavioural observations. Different behavioural patterns exhibited by goats were recorded continuously for 24 h by mini PTZ IR camera in each experimental phase. Time spent in each of the behavioural categories were recorded, i.e. feeding, drinking, standing, lying, moving and agonistic behaviour. Feeding time (min./d) was significantly higher in goats reared on brick (319.83±17.58) and cement concrete (316.22±16.02) floor but dry matter intake (g/min.) (2.92±0.11) was significantly higher in goats reared on earthen floor. Standing time (min./d) in covered area was significantly higher on brick floor. Time spent by goats for lying (min./d) in covered area on earthen (712.17±51.92) and cement concrete (855.83±20.19) floor was comparable but significantly higher as compared to brick floor (338.56±70.98). Time spent for lying (min./d) in covered area was significantly higher in summer season (786.78±45.02). Irrespective of floor and season, goats spent maximum time for lying (55.49%), standing (22.52%) and feeding (21.07%) whereas minimum time spent for other activities. The results indicated that earthen and cement concrete floor were better in terms of welfare and comfort level of goats under stall-fed rearing system.
Downloads
References
1. Al – Ramamneh D, Riek A and Gerken M. 2012. Effect of water restriction on drinking behaviour and water intake in German black head mutton sheep and Boer goats. Animals 6: 173–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111001431
2. Andersen I L and Boe K E. 2007. Resting pattern and social interactions in goat—The impact of size and organization of lying space. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 108: 89–03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.10.015
3. Boe K E, Andersen I L, Buisson L, Simensen E and Jeksrud W K. 2007. Flooring preferences in dairy goats at moderate and low ambient temperature. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 108: 45–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.12.002
4. Centoducati P, Maggiolino A, De Palo P, Milella P and Tateo A. 2015. Semi-extensively reared lactating ewes: Effect of season and space allowance reduction on behavioural, productive and haematological parameters. Journal of Veterinary Behaviour: Clinical Applications and Research 10: 73–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2014.11.002
5. De Kalyan, Kumar D, Kumar K, Sahoo A and Naqvi S M K. 2015. Effect of different types of housing on behaviour of
6. Malpura lambs during winter in semi-arid tropical environment. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 10: 237–42.
7. Engeldal S E C, Subandriyo Handiwirawan E and Noor R R. 2013. Impact of sheep stocking density and breed on behaviour of newly regrouped adult rams. Indonesian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Science 18: 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v18i1.253
8. Færevik G, Andersen I L and Boe K E. 2005. Preferences of sheep for different types of pen flooring. Applied Animal Behavior Science 90: 265–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.010
9. Jadhav P and Killedar A. 2018. Effect of different housing shed on behaviour of Surti goat. International Journal of Livestock Research 8: 145–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20170331095545
10. Mason G, Clubb R, Latham N and Vickery S. 2007. Why and how should we use environmental enrichment to tackle DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.041
11. stereotyped behaviour? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 163–88.
12. Odo B I, Omeje F U and Okwor J N. 2001. Forage species availability, food preference and grazing behaviour of goats DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(01)00228-0
13. in Southern Nigeria. Small Ruminant Research 42: 163–68.
14. Ogebe P O, Ogunmodede B K and McDowell L R. 1996. Behavioural and physiological responses of Nigerian dwarf
15. goats to seasonal changes of the humid tropics. Small Ruminant Research 22: 213–17.
16. Panagakis P, Deligeorgis S, Zervas G and Laliotis G. 2004. Effects of three different floor types on the posture behaviour of semiintensively reared dairy ewes of the Boutsiko breed. Small Ruminant Research 53: 111–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.08.021
17. Patil R A, Karanjkar L M, Jadhav V S, Hanmante A A and Narwade S G. 2008. Effect of housing patterns on microclimate and water intake in Osmanbadi weaned kids. Veterinary World 1: 144–46.
18. Paulo J L A and Lopes F A. 2014. Daily activity patterns of Saanen goats in the semi-arid northeast of Brazil. Revista Brasileira Zootecnia 43:464–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982014000900002
19. Ramachandran N, Singh S P, Kumar A, Pourouchottamane R, Ranjan R, Rai B, Indore N. and Goel A K. 2020. Effect of
20. plastic slatted flooring on growth and welfare of stall-fed kids. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 90: 623–27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i4.104221
21. Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical methods 6th edn. Iowa State University press, Ames, Iowa, USA.
22. Sutherland M A, Lowe G L, Watson T J, Ross C M, Rapp D and Zobel G A. 2017. Dairy goats prefer to use different flooring types to perform different behaviours. Applied Animal Behavior Science 197: 24–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.09.004
23. Tuncer S S, Sireli H D and Tatar A M. 2016. Behavioural patterns of goats, pp. 2369–74. Proceedings of VII International Scientific Agriculture Symposium, “Agrosym 2016”. 6–9 October 2016, Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.