Evaluation of lateral flow assay as a field test for sero-diagnosis of bovine brucellosis
561 / 324
Keywords:
Brucellosis, Bovine, Indirect ELISA, Lateral flow assay, RBPTAbstract
Indirect-ELISA offers a significant advantage over conventional serological methods in the diagnosis of brucellosis in endemic geographical region. Considering iELISA as a gold standard test, RBPT was more sensitive than LFA and the concordance of iELISA with LFA was comparable. The Lateral flow assay is a rapid point-of - care diagnostic test which makes it ideal for use in resource pour countries. It is an immuno-assay and is used also for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. It is a highly sensitive and specific test which does not require expensive equipment, electricity and or refrigeration or special training. The LFA has shown good PPV (positive predictive value) and NPV (negative predictive value) greater than RBPT in the current study suggest that the test is a simple, cost-effective and rapid that provides accurate detection of antibodies to B. abortus in bovine serum samples, thereby saving time and eliminating the need for special training. It could be used conveniently on the field even in farms located in remote areas. However, evaluation on large sample size would be required for future use. Hence, looking to the results obtained in the present study and by other workers, it is recommended that this rapid test can therefore be practically implemented in serological screening for bovine brucellosis, although evaluation on a larger scale with various sera, and blood samples is still necessary.
Downloads
References
Ahmed W A, Majeed S A, Abdul Ameer A H, Mahmmod N D, Saeed N I and Hanna L Y. 2016. Sensitivity and specificity of various serological tests for detection of Brucella spp. Infection in male goats and sheep. Advances in Microbiology 6: 98–103.
Bertu W J, Ocholi R A, Gusi A M, Mwankon E and Hassan M. 2010. Brucella lateral flow assay: A newly introduced test for rapid diagnosis of brucellosis. Vom Journal of Veterinary Science 7: 42–46.
El-EragiA M, Salih M H, Alawad M F E M and Mohammed K B. 2014. Evaluation of lateral flow assay for serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Gezira State, Sudan. Veterinary World 7: 395–97.
Elshemey T M and Abd-Elrahman A H. 2014. Evaluation of a rapid immuno-chromatographic test for detection of
Brucellaabortusantibodies in Egyptian cattle sera and milk. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences 40: 24–28.
Gusi A M, Bertu W J, Jesús de Miguel M, Dieste-Pérez L, Smits H L, Ocholi R A et al. 2019. Comparative performance of
lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and Rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 13(6): e0007509.
Hota S R, Sahoo N and Satpathy S. 2016. Comparison of RBPT, STAT and rapid lateral flow lateral flow assay against indirect ELISA for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Proceedings of International Brucellosis Research Conference, New Delhi, India. pp. 134
Kavya B A, Veeregowda B M, Isloor S, Gowda L, Kamran C, Gomes A R, Triveni K, Padmashree B S and Shome R. 2017.
Comparative evaluation of blood based lateral flow assay for diagnosis of brucellosis in livestock species. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 87(9): 1068–70.
Kavya B A, Veeregowda B M, Shome R, Gowda L, Suresh K P and Gajendragad M R. 2016. A pilot study evaluation of lateral flow assay – a point of care diagnostic for brucellosis. Proceedings of International Brucellosis Research Conference, New Delhi, India. pp.135
Khalek M M A, Ramadan K M, Hazem S S and Khairy E A. 2012. Evaluation of lateral flow assay for serodiagnosis of
Brucella among cattle, sheep and goats in Egypt. Global Veterinaria 8: 511–18.
Kotadiya A J, Kumar P, Patel K M, Patel M V, Shroff S I, Dadawala A I, Srimali M D, Bhagat A, Chandel B S and Shah N M. 2015. Seroprevalence of ovine brucellosis in North Gujarat and Kutchh regions of Gujarat by i-ELISA and its comparison with RBPT and STAT. Indian Veterinary Journal 92: 42–46.
Kushwaha N, Rajora V S, Mohan A and Gupta T K. 2015. Comparative efficacy of diagnostics used for detection of
Brucella antibodies in cattle. Indian Veterinary Journal 92: 18–20.
Lopez-Merino A. 1991. Brucelosis. Progress and Perspectives. Technical Publication of INDRE-SSA No. 6. Secretariat of
Health, Mexico City. pp. 54.
Rahman A K, Saegerman C, Berkvens D, Fretin D, Gani M O, Ershaduzzaman M, Ahmed M U and Emmanuel A. 2013.
Bayesian estimation of true prevalence, sensitivity and specificity of indirect ELISA, Rose Bengal test and slow agglutination test for the diagnosis of brucellosis in sheep and goats in Bangladesh. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 110: 242–52.
Ray W C. 1979. Brucellosis (due to Brucella abortus and B. suis). Hand Book Series in Zoonosis. (Ed) Stell J H. Vol. 1, CRC Press Inc., Florida. pp. 99–185.
Saadat S, Mardaneh J, Ahouran M, Mohammadzadeh A, Ardebili A, Yousefi M and Mansouri M. 2017. Diagnosis of cattle brucellosis by PCR and serological methods: Comparison of diagnostic tests. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal 10: 881–88.
Shome R, Filia G, Padmashree B S, Krithiga N, Sahay S, Triveni K, Shome B R, Mahajan V, Singh A and Rahman H. 2015.
Evaluation of lateral flow assay as a field test for investigation of brucellosis outbreak in an organized buffalo farm: A pilot study. Veterinary World 8: 492–96.
Smits H L, Basahi M A, Diaz R, Marrodan T, Douglas J T, Rocha A, Veerman J, Zheludkov M M, Witte O W M, De Jong J,
Gussenhoven G C, Goris M G A and Vanderhoorn M A W G. 1999. Development and evaluation of rapid dipstick assay for the serodiagnosis of the early phase of brucellosis in humans. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37: 4179–82.
Trangadia B J and Prasad M C. 2017. Evaluation of immunochromatographic assay as a field test for the diagnosis
of caprine brucellosis. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 88(8): 877–80.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.