Test day yield, lactation curve and production potential of Gir cattle under hot and humid conditions of Tamil Nadu

VENKATARAMANAN; S MEENAKSHI SUNDARAM; VRINDA B AMBIKE; T MUTHURAMALINGAM; M MANOBHAVAN

doi:10.56093/ijans.v91i12.119832

Authors

VENKATARAMANAN Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 India
S MEENAKSHI SUNDARAM Livestock Farm Complex, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
VRINDA B AMBIKE Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
T MUTHURAMALINGAM Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 India
M MANOBHAVAN Livestock Farm Complex, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Chennai, Tamil Nadu

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v91i12.119832

Keywords:

Gir, Hot and humid, Lactation curve models, Test day yield

Abstract

Test day milk yield records (5130), milk production and milk composition traits from 19 lactations of Gir cows collected for two years (2019 and 2020) were used to understand the performance of Gir breed in hot and humid conditions of Tamil Nadu. Different lactation curve models were used for modelling test day records and model diagnostics like adjusted R-square, BIC and RMSE were used to obtain the model of best fit. The mean test day yield, fat per cent, SNF (%), total milk yield, peak yield, days to attain peak yield and calving interval observed were 5.78 kg, 5.05%, 7.65%, 1507 kg, 9.23 kg, 46.5 days and 447 days respectively. Ali and Shaeffer model offered the best fit for lactation curve in Gir cows. Mahadevan method and Gamma function were used to calculate the persistency of milk yield which was obtained as 1.33 and 6.348 respectively. Results of the study indicated that Gir cattle were able to adapt themselves through maintenance of reproductive traits comparable with that of the native tract but the new humid environment has caused a slight decrease in the performance of milk production traits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Araújo T P M, Rangel A H D N, Lima G F D C, Peixoto M G C D, Urbano S A and Bezerra J D S. 2018. Gir and Guzerat cow milk production and composition according to lactation stage, somatic cell count, physiological state and body condition. Acta Scientiarum Animal Sciences 40(1): 39352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v40i1.39352

2. Bangar Y C and Verma M R. 2017. Non-linear modelling to describe lactation curve in Gir crossbred cows. Journal of DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-017-0128-6

3. Animal Science and Technology 59(1): 1–7.

4. Biswal S, Thirunavukkarasu M, Selvam S, Venkataramanan R and Pandian A S S. 2017. Modeling lactation curve in jersey

5. crossbred cows. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5(6): 1282–85.

6. Daltro D D S, Padilha A H, Gama L T D, Silva M V G B D and Cobuci J A. 2021. Breed, heterosis, and recombination effects for lactation curves in Brazilian cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5020200085

7. Dora D S, Chourasia S K, Sahu S S, Paikra D and Bara S. 2020. Relationship between different milk constituents of GIR

8. cow. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 8(2): 551–53.

9. Gadariya M R, Vataliya P H, Murthy K S and Gajbhiye P U. 2017. Breeding and lactation efficiencies, production profile,

10. productive herd life and lifetime productivity of Gir cows in their home tract. Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and

11. Biotechnology 13(02): 26–30.

12. Gajbhiye P U, Ahlawat A R, Sharma H A and Parikh S S. 2019. Effect of stage, season and parity of lactation on milk

13. composition in Gir cattle. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8(3): 2419–25.

14. Gaur G K, Kaushik S N and Garg R C. 2003. The Gir cattle breed of India-characteristics and present status. Animal Genetic DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1014233900001607

15. Resources 33: 21–29.

16. Jamrozik J and Schaeffer L R. 1997. Estimates of genetic parameters for a test day model with random regressions for

17. yield traits of first lactation Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 80(4): 762–70.

18. Mahadevan P. 1951. The effect of environment and heredity on lactation. II. Persistency of lactation. Journal of Agricultural DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600058573

19. Science 41(1–2): 89–93.

20. Patbandha T K, Sabapara G P, Savaliya B D, Dash S K, Parikh S S and Ali M. 2020. Physical characteristics and production

21. performance of Gir cattle in India. International Journal of Livestock Research 10(8): 1–11.

22. Pereira R J, Ayres D R, Santana Junior M L, Faro L E, Vercesi Filho A E and Albuquerque L G D. 2019. Test-day or 305-day milk yield for genetic evaluation of Gir cattle. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-3921.pab2019.v54.00325

23. R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Version: 3.6.1.

24. Savaliya B D, Parikh S S, Ahlawat A R and Makwana R B. 2017. Comparative efficiency of various mathematical functions of lactation curve in Gir cattle using weekly milk yields. International Journal of Livestock Research 7(5): 112–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20170405041410

25. Savaliya B D, Parikh S S, Gamit P M and Gajbhiye P U. 2016. Environmental factors affecting economic traits in Gir

26. cattle. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology 5(4): 2467–75.

27. Sharma N, Narang R, Kashyap N, Kumari S, Kaur S and Ratwan P. 2018. Genetic analysis of persistency in HF crossbred cattle at an organized farm of northern India. Tropical Animal Health and Production 50(6): 1219–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1546-2

28. Tekerli M, Akinci Z, Dogan I and Akcan A. 2000. Factors affecting the shape of lactation curves of Holstein cows from the DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75006-5

29. Balikesir province of Turkey. Journal of Dairy Science 83(6): 1381–86.