Effect of body weight and scrotal circumference on semen production traits in murrah buffalo bulls


304 / 126

Authors

  • RAMAJAYAN P Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 051 India
  • S N SIVASELVAM Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 051 India
  • S M K KARTHICKEYAN Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 051 India
  • R VENKATARAMANAN Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 051 India
  • A GOPINATHAN Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 051 India
  • K KULASEKAR Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 051 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i1.120921

Keywords:

Body weight, Murrah bulls, Scrotal circumference, Semen production traits

Abstract

The study was undertaken to determine the effect of bodyweight and scrotal circumference on semen production traitsin Murrah buffalo bulls. Data on seminal characteristics,body weight, and scrotal circumference collected from 77Murrah bulls were utilized to study the effects using leastsquareanalysis under General Linear Model. Body weightand scrotal circumference showed a highly significantimpact on all semen production traits. Similarly, thecorrelation coefficients were also highly significant andpositive, except the non-correlation between scrotalcircumference and post-thaw motility. An increasing trendin seminal parameters in rise with body weight and scrotalcircumference were also observed. Furthermore, bullsweighing 540 kg and above with scrotal circumference of>30 cm displayed better semen quality with higher numberof frozen semen doses per ejaculate. These findings suggestthat higher body weight and scrotal circumference couldbe considered as important selection criteria parameterswhile selecting young bulls for the purpose of frozen semenproduction to improve the frozen semen doses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhave K G, Thilak Pon Jawahar K, Kumarasamy P, Sivakumar T, Joseph C, Shende V, Kundalkar A and Venkararamanan R. 2020. Semen quality and production potential of Indian buffalo breeds. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 90(11): 1485–87.

Ramajayan P. 2016. ‘Genetic studies on semen production in Murrah buffalo bulls reared in Tamil Nadu’. M.V.Sc. Thesis. Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Ravimurugan T and Sindhu C. 2020. Effect of age and body weight on semen volume of Murrah bulls. International Journal of Chemical Studies 8(5): 33–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i5a.10366

Shende V H, Sontakke S H, Potdar V V, Shirsath T V and Khadse J R. 2019. Scrotal circumference and its relationship with testicular growth, age and body weight in Murrah buffalo bulls. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8(11): 2270–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.811.264

Singh P, Singh I, Singh K, Singh S and Phulia S K. 2010. Relationship of age and body weight with scrotal circumference in Murrah buffalo bulls or males. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80(5): 418–21.

Yadav S K, Singh P, Kumar R, Bhakat M, Singh A, Mondal S and Patel B. 2017. Relationship among testicular, physical and semen quality parameters of Murrah buffalo breeding bulls. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 70(3): 462–46.

Yadav S K, Singh P, Kumar P, Singh S V, Singh A and Kumar S. 2019. Scrotal infrared thermography and testicular biometry: Indicator of semen quality in Murrah buffalo bulls. Animal Reproduction Science 209: 106145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106145

Downloads

Submitted

2022-02-01

Published

2022-02-01

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

P, R., SIVASELVAM, S. N., KARTHICKEYAN, S. M. K., VENKATARAMANAN, R., GOPINATHAN, A., & KULASEKAR, K. (2022). Effect of body weight and scrotal circumference on semen production traits in murrah buffalo bulls. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 92(1), 59-61. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i1.120921
Citation