Comparative adaptive immune response in Indian and exotic breeds of domestic chicken

RENUKA YADAV; RAJESH KUMAR; GARIMA PANDEY; AAKANKSHA TIWARI; RITIKA BISHT; ANIL KUMAR; ANUPAMA MISHRA; PRAKASH BHATT

doi:10.56093/ijans.v92i2.122078

Authors

RENUKA YADAV Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145 India
RAJESH KUMAR Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145 India
GARIMA PANDEY Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145 India
AAKANKSHA TIWARI Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145 India
RITIKA BISHT Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145 India
ANIL KUMAR Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145 India
ANUPAMA MISHRA Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145 India
PRAKASH BHATT Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i2.122078

Keywords:

Chicken, Immune response, Kadaknath, Rhode Island Red, Uttara fowl

Abstract

RIR is best among three breeds studied in terms of adaptive immune response and disease resistance closely followed by Kadaknath. Uttara fowl ranked third hence, its resistance can be increased by incorporating traits from RIR or Kadaknath by employing appropriate genetic techniques. A new breed so developed is expected to exhibit better immune response and adaptability to high altitudes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas A K, Lichtman A H and Pober J S. 2001. Cellular and Molecular Immunology. (Eds) Abbas A K, Lichtman and Pober J S. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.

Allan W H and Gough R E. 1974. A standard Haemagglutination inhibition test for Newcastle disease. A comparision of macro and micro methods. Veterinary Record 95:120–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.95.6.120

Ansari V. 2015. ‘Comparative study on productive performance of comb and crown ecotypes of Uttara fowl.’ M.V.Sc. Thesis. Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. P.3.

Awadhiya R P, Vegad J L and Kolte G N. 1982. Eosinophil leukocytic response in dinitrochlorobenzene skin hypersensitivity reaction in chicken. Avian Pathology 11: 187– 94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03079458208436092

Boyum A. 1967. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Isolation of mononuclear cells by one centrifugation, and of granulocytes by combining centrifugation and sedimentation at 1 g. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical Laboratory Investigation 97: 77–89.

Corrier D E and Deloah J R. 1990. Evaluation of cell mediated Cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity in young chickens by inter-digital skin test. Poultry Science 69: 403–08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690403

Dewna A. 2016. ‘Evaluation of performance of diallel cross of kadaknath, RIR and black australorp by griffing’s and hayman’s approach.’ M.V.Sc. Thesis, Rajasthan University Of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bikaner. 3 p

Hari Babu Y, Bhaskar S K, Prabhakar Rao P and Krishna A. 1993. Evaluation of cell- mediated immune response in cattle affected with rinderpest using 2,4-dinitro- chlorobenzene. Indian Journal of Comparative Microbiology, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases 14: 4–7.

Haunshi S, Niranjan M, Shanmugam M, Padhi M K, Reddy M R, Sunitha R, Rajkumar U and Panda A K. 2011. Characterization of two Indian native chicken breeds for production, egg and semen quality, and welfare traits. Poultry Science 90(2): 314– 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01013

Kumar R, Chandra R and Shukla S K. 2003. Isolation of etiological agent of hydropericardium syndrome in chicken embryo liver cell culture and its serological characterization. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 41: 821–26.

McFerran J B and Smyth J A. 2000. Avian adenoviruses. Revue Scientifique Et Technique (International Office of Epizootics) 19(2): 589–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.19.2.1238

Rao G V and Thomas P C. 1984. The breed characteristics of Kadaknath breed of indigenous (Desi) chicken. Avian Research 68: 55–57.

Sheoran O P. 2010. Statistical Package for Agricultural Scientists (OPSTAT), CCS HAU. http://www. hau.ernet.in/about/ opstat.php.

Singh S P, Brah G S, Chaudhary M L and Rajkumar G V P P S. 2009. Evaluation and comparison of immune response to sheep red blood cells and PHA-P inoculation in pure and crossbred chicken. Indian Journal of Poultry Sciences 44(1): 225–32.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBM Publications, New Delhi. Pp 265.

Trivedi R N, Kumar R, Metwal M, Khan A S, Tiwari A, Panday G and Kumar A. 2018. Epidemiological observations on some natural outbreaks of Inclusion Body Hepatitis- Hydropericardium Syndrome (IBH-HPS) in domestic chicken. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7(8): 3012–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.320