Nutritional evaluation of different rice (Oryza sativa) straw of bio-fortified varieties, bio-fortified breeding lines and breeding lines


Abstract views: 362 / PDF downloads: 95

Authors

  • S B N RAO ICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560 030 India
  • K SUMAN ICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560 030 India
  • C N NEERAJA ICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560 030 India
  • R M SUNDARAM ICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560 030 India
  • M NALINA ICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560 030 India
  • M CHANDRASEKHARAIAH ICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560 030 India
  • S PARTHIPAN ICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560 030 India
  • N M SOREN ICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560 030 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i3.122279

Keywords:

ICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560 030 India

Abstract

A total of 13 varieties of rice straw including eight biofortified varieties (BFV), two bio-fortified breeding lines (BBL), two breeding lines (BL) and one check variety of rice straw were subjected to straw quality evaluation. The Straw CP was negatively correlated with CF of straw and positively correlated with Iron and zinc content of brown rice and zinc content of polished rice. CF of rice straw was negatively correlated with important plant breeding parameters such as single plant dry weight, flag leaf length, iron content of brown rice, zinc content of both brown and polished rice. Improved bio-fortified breeding lines had more zinc than bio-fortified varieties indicating further scope of improvement of zinc content in straw. In vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) ranged from 37.9 in DRR Dhan 45 to 49.6 in DRR Dhan49 with an average of 43.0 in different bio-fortified varieties. Thus, the straw obtained from different bio-fortified crops is valuable feed item which needs to be utilized in livestock rations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC International. 2012. Official Methods of Analysis, 19th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.

Cottyn B G and Boucque C V. 1968. Rapid method for the gas chromatographic determination of volatile fatty acids in rumen fluid. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 16: 105– 07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60155a002

Gorti R K, Suresh K P, Sampath K T, Giridhar K and Anandan S. 2012. Modeling and forecasting livestock and fish feed resources: Requirement and Availability in India. Published by Director, National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, 91 p.

Khan M U, Qasim M, Subhan M, Ahmad R D and Ali L. 2003. Effect of Zinc application by different methods on the chemical composition and grain quality of rice. Pakistan Journal of Applied Sciences 3: 530–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2003.530.536

Klopfenstein T. 1978. Chemical treatment of crop residues, Journal of Animal Science 46: 841–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.463841x

Menke K H and Steingass H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research Development 28: 7–55.

Neeraja C N Ravindra Babu V, Ram Sewa, Hossain F, Hariprasanna K, Rajpurohit B S, Prabhakar T, Longvah T, Prasad K S, Sandhu J S and Datta S K. 2017. Biofortification in cereals: Progress and prospects. Current Science 113: 1050– 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v113/i06/1050-1057

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical methods. 8th edn. USA: Iowa State Univeristy Press.

Sun D, Waters J K and Mawhinney T P. 2000. Determination of thirteen common elements in food samples by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry: Comparison of five digestion methods. Journal of AOAC International 83: 1218–24.

Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

Wei Y, Shohag M J I and Yang X. 2012. Biofortification and bio- availability of Rice grain Zinc as affected by different forms of foliar zinc fertilization. PLoS ONE 7: e45428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045428

Downloads

Submitted

2022-03-15

Published

2022-03-15

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

RAO, S. B. N., SUMAN, K., NEERAJA, C. N., SUNDARAM, R. M., NALINA, M., CHANDRASEKHARAIAH, M., PARTHIPAN, S., & SOREN, N. M. (2022). Nutritional evaluation of different rice (Oryza sativa) straw of bio-fortified varieties, bio-fortified breeding lines and breeding lines. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 92(3), 390-393. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i3.122279
Citation