Effect of dietary supplementation of brown seaweed on performance of broiler chicken


Abstract views: 447 / PDF downloads: 436

Authors

  • VISHNUDAS CHAVAN College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Udgir, Maharashtra 413 517 India
  • R C KULKARNI Assistant Professor, Department of Poultry Science, College of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Udgir Dist. Latur (Maharashtra State) PIN 413517
  • S P AWANDKAR College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Udgir, Maharashtra 413 517 India
  • S G CHAVHAN College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Udgir, Maharashtra 413 517 India
  • N Z GAIKWAD College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Udgir, Maharashtra 413 517 India
  • R D SURYAWANSHI College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Udgir, Maharashtra 413 517 India
  • M B KULKARNI College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Udgir, Maharashtra 413 517 India
  • SATYAJIT SATAPATHY College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Udgir, Maharashtra 413 517 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i8.123132

Keywords:

brown seaweed, feed conversion ratio, immune response

Abstract

 A bio-assay was conducted to evaluate the effect of dietary supplementation of brown seaweed (Sargassum wigetti) on the performance of broilers. Broilers (400) were divided into 5 treatment groups. Each treatment had 8 replicates with 10 birds per replicate. The chicks of control (Group A) were fed a basal diet. Group B was fed a basal diet with bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) at 0.005%. Treatment Groups C, D, and E received the basal diet with supplementation of 0.07, 0.1, and 0.13% brown seaweed, respectively. All the diets were made isocaloric and isonitrogenous. Standard management practices were followed in the rearing of birds. Parameters, viz. growth performance, immune response, total viable count (TVC) and carcass traits were studied for a period of six weeks. Group E exhibited higher weight gain and better feed conversion ratio compared to Groups D, C, and B. The feed consumption was similar for Groups C, D, and E. Mortality was lower (2.5%) in Groups B, C, D, and E compared to Group A (3.75%). The eviscerated, ready to cook, breast, thigh, and drumstick yields were greater in Group E whereas higher giblet weights were recorded in Groups D and E. The cell-mediated immune response was significantly better in Group E compared to Groups D, C, B, and A with higher weight of lymphoid organs (thymus and spleen). Groups D and E were associated with a lower TVC, followed by Group C compared to positive control (Group B) and negative control (Group A). It was concluded that supplementation of 0.13% brown seaweed in the diet of broilers improved growth performance, cell mediated immunity, total viable count and carcass traits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • R C KULKARNI, Assistant Professor, Department of Poultry Science, College of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Udgir Dist. Latur (Maharashtra State) PIN 413517

    Department of Poultry Science,

    Assistant Professor

References

Abudabos A M, Okab A B, Aljumaah R S, Samara E M, Abdoun K A and Al-Haidary A A. 2013. Nutritional value of green seaweed (Ulva lactuca) for broiler chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science 12(2): e28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2013.e28

Andri, F, Dono N D, Sasongko H and Zuprizal Z. 2020. The effects of dietary seaweed inclusion on growth performance of broiler chickens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000 Research 9(1087): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25726.1

Armin F, Rahimi S, Mahdi Abkenar A, Ghofrani Ivari A Y and Ebrahimi H. 2015. Effect of Sargassum spp. and vitamin E on stability of fish oil enriched meat in broiler chickens. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science 5(2): 385–92.

Artan M, Li Y, Karadeniz F, Lee S H, Kim M M and Kim S K. 2008. Anti-HIV- 1 activity of phloroglucinol derivative, 6, 6′-bieckol, from Ecklonia cava. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry 16(17): 7921–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2008.07.078

Bai, J, Wang R, Yan L and Feng J. 2019. Co-supplementation of dietary seaweed powder and antibacterial peptides improves broiler growth performance and immune function. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science: pp 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0826

Bedford M. 2000. Removal of antibiotic growth promoters from poultry diets: Implications and strategies to minimize subsequent problems. World’s Poultry Science Journal 56(4): 347–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20000024

BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard). 2007. Indian standard of poultry feeds specification. New Delhi, pp 14.

Bonos E, Kargopoulos A, Nikolakakis I, Florou-Paneri P and Christaki E. 2016. The seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum as a potential functional ingredient in chicken nutrition. Journal of Oceanography and Marine Research 4(1): 4–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2572-3103.1000140

Canedo-Castro B, Pinon-Gimate A, Carrillo S, Ramos D and Casas-Valdez M. 2019. Prebiotic effect of Ulva rigida meal on the intestinal integrity and serum cholesterol and triglyceride content in broilers. Journal of Applied Phycology 31(5): 3265–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-019-01785-x

Chandini S K, Ganesan P and Bhaskar N. 2008. In vitro antioxidant activities of three selected brown seaweeds of India. Food Chemistry 107(2): 707–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.08.081

Choi Y J, Lee S R and Oh J W. 2014. Effects of dietary fermented seaweed and seaweed fusiforme on growth performance, carcass parameters and immunoglobulin concentration in broiler chicks. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27(6): 862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14015

Corrier D E and DeLoach J R. 1990. Evaluation of cell-mediated, cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity in young chickens by an interdigital skin test. Poultry Science 69(3): 403–08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690403

Duncan D B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11(1): 1–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478

Dhargalkar V K and Pereira N. 2005. Seaweed: Promising plant of the millennium. Science and Culture 71(3-4): 60–66.

Deek A A and Brikaa A M. 2009. Effect of different levels of seaweed in starter and finisher diets in pellet and mash form on performance and carcass quality of ducks. International Journal of Poultry Science 8(10): 1014–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.1014.1021

Manal K, El-naga A and Megahed M M. 2018. Impact of brown algae supplementation in drinking water on growth performance and intestine histological changes of broiler chicks. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds 21(2): 495– 507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejnf.2018.75603

Erum T, Frias G G and Cocal C J. 2017. Sargassum muticumas feed substitute for broiler. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences 4: 6–9.

Gumus R E C E P, Gelen S U, Koseoglu S, Ozkanlar S, Ceylan Z G and Imik H. 2018. The effects of fucoxanthin dietary inclusion on the growth performance, antioxidant metabolism and meat quality of broilers. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 20: 487–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0666

Hafsa S H, Zeweil H S, Zahran S M, Ahmed M H, Dosoky W and Rwif N A. 2019. Effects of dietary supplementation with green and brown seaweeds on laying performance, egg quality, blood lipid profile and antioxidant capacity in laying Japanese quail. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal 39(1): 41–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/epsj.2019.28828

Hussein E A. 2018. Effect of dietary brown algae supplementation on the performance of broiler chicks. Menoufia Journal of Animal Poultry and Fish Production 2(1): 11–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/mjapfp.2018.123312

India Poultry Market Report and Forcast. 2021-2026. https:www. expertmarketresearch.com/re ports/india-poultry-market.

Karu P, Selvan S T, Gopi H and Manobhavan M. 2018. Effect of macroalgae supplementation on growth performance of Japanese quails. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7(2): 1039–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.128

Kereh V G, Untu I M, Najoan M, Lumi T F D and Telleng M M. 2021. Extraction of uronic acid from Sargassum crassifolium and its feeding effects on the immunity of Lohman chicken eggs. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 788(1): 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/788/1/012047

Khotimchenko S V and Yakovleva I M. 2005. Lipid composition of the red alga Tichocarpus crinitus exposed to different levels of photon irradiance. Phytochemistry 66(1): 73–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.10.024

Kim Y, Jin J and Yang H. S. 2009. Effect of dietary garlic bulb and husk on the physicochemical properties of chicken meat. Poultry Science 88(2): 398–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00179

Kong X, Ge H, Chen L, Liu Z, Yin Z, Li P and Li M. 2009. Gamma-linolenic acid modulates the response of multidrug-resistant K562 leukemic cells to anticancer drugs. Toxicology In Vitro 23(4): 634–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2009.02.010

Kumar K A. 2018. Effect of Sargassum wightii on growth, carcass, and serum qualities of broiler chickens. Open Access Journal of Veterinary Science and Research 3(2): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23880/oajvsr-16000156

Mattio L and Payri C E. 2011. 190 years of Sargassum taxonomy, facing the advent of DNA phylogenies. Botanical Review 77(1): 31–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-010-9060-x

Mohammdigheisar M, Shouldice V L, Sands J S, Lepp D, Diarra M S and Kiarie E G. 2020. Growth performance, breast yield, gastrointestinal ecology and plasma biochemical profile in broiler chickens fed multiple doses of a blend of red, brown and green seaweeds. British Poultry Science 61(5): 590–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2020.1774512

Pomponi S A. 1999. The bioprocess-technological potential of the sea. Progress in Industrial Microbiology 35: 5–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6352(99)80092-7

Pushpamali W A, Nikapitiya C, De Zoysa M, Whang I, Kim S J and Lee J. 2008. Isolation and purification of an anticoagulant from fermented red seaweed Lomentaria catenata. Carbohydrate Polymers 73(2): 274–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.11.029

Reski S, Mahata M E, Rizal Y and Pazla R. 2021. Influence of brown seaweed (Turbinaria murayana) in optimizing performance and carcass quality characteristics in broiler chickens. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 9(3): 407–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2021/9.3.407.415

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. 8th Edition, Iowa State University Press, Ames.

Vijayabaskar P and Shiyamala V. 2011. Antibacterial activities of brown marine algae (Sargassum wightii and Turbinaria ornata) from the Gulf of Mannar Biosphere Reserve. Advances in Biological Research 5(2): 99–102.

Wenk C. 2003. Herbs and botanicals as feed additives in monogastric animals. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 16(2): 282–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.282

Whitehead C C. 2002. Nutrition and poultry welfare. World’s Poultry Science Journal 58(3): 349–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20020027

Wijesekara I, Pangestuti R and Kim S K. 2011. Biological activities and potential health benefits of sulfated polysaccharides derived from marine algae. Carbohydrate Polymers 84(1): 14–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.062

Yadav A S, Kolluri G, Gopi M, Karthik K and Singh Y. 2016. Exploring alternatives to antibiotics as health promoting agents in poultry-A review. Journal of Experimental Biology 4(3s): 368–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18006/2016.4(3S).368.383

Yuan Y V and Walsh N A. 2006. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of extracts from a variety of edible seaweeds. Food and Chemical Toxicology 44(7): 1144–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2006.02.002

Downloads

Submitted

2022-04-07

Published

2022-08-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

CHAVAN, V., KULKARNI, R. C., AWANDKAR, S. P., CHAVHAN, S. G., GAIKWAD, N. Z., SURYAWANSHI, R. D., KULKARNI, M. B., & SATAPATHY, S. (2022). Effect of dietary supplementation of brown seaweed on performance of broiler chicken. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 92(8), 999-1005. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i8.123132
Citation