Evaluation of health status of Kankrej cattle using mini compton metabolic profile test and correlation with production status

ANKIT PRAJAPATI; HARSHAD PANCHASARA; ABHINAV SUTHAR; ARTH CHAUDHARI; SARITA DEVI; RAMESHCHANDRA PATEL

doi:10.56093/ijans.v93i3.124297

Authors

ANKIT PRAJAPATI College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat
HARSHAD PANCHASARA Livestock Research Station, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat
ABHINAV SUTHAR College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat
ARTH CHAUDHARI College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat
SARITA DEVI College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat
RAMESHCHANDRA PATEL College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v93i3.124297

Keywords:

Cattle, Kankrej, Mini compton metabolic profile, Production

Abstract

The present study aimed to assess the changes in metabolite after adaptation of Kankrej breed of cattle from draught to milch purpose. The result showed the resistance power of alteration in metabolic values even after adaptation. Metabolic parameters can be measured to evaluate the health status of individual animal in herd by using mini compton metabolic profile test. Feeding management can be adjusted as per the data of metabolic profile to avoid incidence of metabolic diseases. Indigenous cattle breed is tough enough which resist the alteration in different metabolic parameters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arbib N, Aviram A, Gabbay Ben-Ziv R, Sneh O, Yogev Y and Hadar E. 2016. The effect of labor and delivery on white blood cell count. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine :Official Journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians 29(18): 2904–08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1110572

Bhadauria P, Lathwal S S, Jadoun Y S and Gupta R. 2020. Metabolic profiling of normal and lame Karan fries cows and its association with lameness during transition period. Journal of Animal Research 10(3): 375–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30954/2277-940X.03.2020.7

Blowey R W. 1972. Metabolic profiles-some aspects of their interpretation and use in the field. (Eds) Grunsell and Hill. The Veterinary Annual, pp. 21–30.

Blowey R W. 1975. A practical application of metabolic profiles. Veterinary Record 97: 324–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.97.17.324

Blowey R W, Wood D W and Davis J R. 1973. A nutritional monitoring system for dairy herds based on blood glucose, urea and albumin levels. Veterinary Record 92: 691–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.92.26.691

Chapinal N, Leblanc S J, Carson M E, Leslie K E, Godden S, Capel M, Santos J E, Overton M W and Duffield T F. 2012. Herd-level association of serum metabolites in the transition period with disease, milk production, and early lactation reproductive performance. Journal of Dairy Science 95(10): 5676–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5132

Das H, Lateef A, Panchasara H, Sanap M J and Haque N. 2014. Seasonal effect on major blood biochemical parameters in kankrej cattle at different level of their productivity. Indian Journal of Field Veterinarians 9: 12–15.

Haq Z, Sharma R K, Rastogi A and Khan N. 2016. Nutrition and metabolic diseases in dairy cattle-A review. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8: 1154–59.

Payne J M, Dew S M, Manston R and Faulks M. 1970. The use of a metabolic profile test in dairy herds. Veterinary Record 87(6): 150–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.87.6.150

Lohrenz A K, Duske K, Schneider F, Nürnberg K, Losand B, Seyfert H M, Metges C C and Hammon H M. 2010. Milk performance and glucose metabolism in dairy cows fed rumen-protected fat during mid lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 93(12): 5867–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3342

Newman J C and Verdin E. 2017. β-Hydroxybutyrate: A signaling metabolite. Annual Review of Nutrition 37: 51–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-071816-064916

Parmar V L, Panchasara H H, Prajwalita P T, Sutariya T V, Sadhu D B and Prajapati H B. 2015. Synergism of vitamin E and selenium on oxidative stress during transition period in kankrej cattle. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science and Biotechnology 10(3): 1–3.

Piccione G, Messina V, Schembari A, Casella S, Giannetto C and Alberghina D. 2011. Pattern of serum protein fractions in dairy cows during different stages of gestation and lactation. Journal of Dairy Research 78(4): 421–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029911000562

Prakash M, Pathan M, Arya J S and Lunagariya P. 2018. Assessment of glucose, total protein, albumin and cholesterol level and its correlation with milk production during different stages of lactation in indigenous and crossbred cows. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7(4): 1248-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.704.139

Regmi B, Shah M K and Pande K R. 2020. Metabolic profile of lactating jersey crossbred cattle- an evaluation study. Intas Polivet 21(2): 360–62.

Rossato W, González F H D, Dias M M, Ricco D, Valle S F, Rosa V L, Conceicao T, Duarte F and Wald V. 2001. Number of lactations affects metabolic profile of dairy cows. Archives of Veterinary Science 6(2): 83–88.

Sulieman M S, Makawi S E and Ibrahim K E. 2017. Association between postpartum blood levels of glucose and urea and fertility of cross-bred dairy cows in Sudan. South African Journal of Animal Science 47(5): 595–605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v47i5.2

Van Saun R. 2006. Metabolic profiles for evaluation of the transition period. Proc. Am. Assoc. Bov. Pract 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21423/aabppro20064693

Van Saun R J. 2016. Indicators of dairy cow transition risks: Metabolic profiling revisited. Tierarztliche Praxis. Ausgabe G, Grosstiere/Nutztiere 44(2): 118–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15653/TPG-150947