Genetic evaluation of sperm abnormality traits in Holstein Friesian crossbred bulls using random regression models


Abstract views: 51 / PDF downloads: 73

Authors

  • VRINDA B AMBIKE Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 051 India
  • VENKATARAMANAN R Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
  • S M K KARTHICKEYAN Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 051 India
  • K G TIRUMURUGAAN Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 India
  • KAUSTUBH G BHAVE BAIF Development Research Foundation, Uruli Kanchan, Pune, Maharashtra
  • JAYANT KHADSE BAIF Development Research Foundation, Uruli Kanchan, Pune, Maharashtra

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v93i8.124814

Keywords:

Bayesian framework, Genetic correlation, Legendre polynomials

Abstract

Genetic parameters of sperm abnormality traits were evaluated in HF crossbred bulls using Bayesian univariate, bivariate and random regression models. Data from 161 bulls on 1,527 ejaculates collected from 2010 to 2020 at BAIF (Bharatiya Agro Industries Foundation) was utilized for this study. Four sperm abnormality traits viz. total abnormalities (A), head abnormality (HA), mid-piece abnormality (MA) and tail abnormality (TA) were included in the analysis. Gibbs sampling was done to implement a Bayesian framework. Means for A, HA, MA and TA were 10.77%, 2.99%. 2.61% and 5.10% respectively. Heritability and repeatability estimates obtained from univariate
analysis were below 0.1. Genetic correlations obtained for the total abnormalities with semen production traits like ejaculate volume, sperm concentration, initial sperm motility, post-thaw motility and the total number of spermatozoa were negative. Heritability and repeatability estimates were higher in the case of random regression models where the values tend to increase with the age of the bulls. Heritability ranged from 0.025 (3 years) to 0.139 (10 years) for total abnormality estimates. In general, the estimates of genetic parameters for abnormality were low and found to increase with age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhakat M, Mohanty T K, Gupta A K and Abdullah M. 2014. Effect of season on semen quality of crossbred (Karan Fries) bulls. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 2(11): 632-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2014/2.11.632.637

Bhave K G. 2021. ‘Genetic evaluation of semen production and fertility traits in exotic, crossbred and indigenous cattle.’ Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Carvalho Filho I, Marques D B D, Campos C F, Guimarães J D, Guimarães S E F, Lopes P S, Silva F F E and Veroneze R. 2020. Genetic parameters for fertility traits in Nellore bulls. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 55(1): 38–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13578

Chenoweth P J. 2005. Genetic sperm defects. Theriogenology 64(3): 457-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.005

Druet T, Fritz S, Sellem E, Basso B, Gérard O, Salas-Cortes L, Humblot P, Druart X and Eggen A. 2009. Estimation of genetic parameters and genome scan for 15 semen characteristics traits of Holstein bulls. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 126(4): 269–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2008.00788.x

Engidawork B. 2018. Artificial insemination service efficiency and constraints of artificial insemination service in selected districts of Harari National Regional State, Ethiopia. OJAS 08(03): 239–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2018.83018

Hagiya K, Hanamure T, Hayakawa H, Abe H, Baba T, Muranishi Y and Terawaki Y. 2018. Genetic correlations between yield traits or days open measured in cows and semen production traits measured in bulls. Animal 12(10): 2027–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003470

Karabinus D S, Evenson D P, Jost L K, Baer R K and Kaproth M T. 1990. Comparison of semen quality in young and mature Holstein Bulls measured by light microscopy and flow cytometry. Journal of Dairy Sciences 73(9): 2364–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78919-9

Kumaresan A, Elango K, Datta T K and Morrell J M. 2021. Cellular and molecular insights into the etiology of subfertility/ infertility in crossbred bulls (Bos taurus× Bos indicus): A review. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.696637

Magnabosco C D U, Lôbo R B and Famula T R. 2000. Bayesian inference for genetic parameter estimation on growth traits for Nelore cattle in Brazil, using the Gibbs sampler. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 117(3): 169–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2000.00248.x

Mandal D K, Kumar M and Tyagi S. 2009. Effect of age on spermiogram of Holstein Friesian × Sahiwal crossbred bulls. Animal 4(4): 595–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109991273

Meyer K and Hill W G. 1997. Estimation of genetic and phenotypic covariance functions for longitudinal or ‘repeated’ records by restricted maximum likelihood. Livestock Production Science 47(3): 185–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(96)01414-5

Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Lourenco D A L, Masuda Y, Aguilar I, Legarra A and Vitezica Z. 2018. Manual for BLUPF90 family programs. University of Georgia.

Narasimha Rao A, Sreemannarayana O and Narasimha Rao A. 1996. Sperm abnormalities in Jersey and its crosses. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 49: 362–64.

Olsen H B, Heringstad B and Klemetsdal G. 2020. Genetic analysis of semen characteristic traits in young Norwegian Red bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 103(1): 545–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17291

Pal A S, Singh V and Patel A. 2020. Studies on seminal attributes of neat semen of Hariana Bulls. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 9: 1742–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.901.194

Patel B R and Siddiquee G M. 2013. Physical and morphological characteristics of Kankrej bull semen. Veterinary World 6(7): 405–08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2013.405-408

Ray K and Ghosh B B. 2013. Semen ejaculates characteristics, in-vitro fertility and their interrelationships in Sahiwal bull semen. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Sciences 3(3): 483–89.

Seyoum K, Lemma A and Tera A. 2021. Influence of breed on motility and motion characteristics of fresh, chilled and frozen bull spermatozoa. International Journal of Livestock Production 12(1): 37–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLP2020.0700

Singh S, Bhakat M, Mohanty T K, Kumar A, Gupta A K, Chakravarty A K and Singh P. 2015. Sexual behaviour and its relationship with semen quality parameters in Sahiwal breeding bulls. Veterinary World 8(6): 745–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.745-749

Söderquist L, Janson L, Larsson K and Einarsson S. 1991. Sperm morphology and fertility in AI bulls. Journal of Veterinary Medicine 38(1‐10): 534–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.1991.tb01045.x

Downloads

Submitted

2022-06-14

Published

2023-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

AMBIKE, V. B., R, V., KARTHICKEYAN, S. M. K., TIRUMURUGAAN, K. G., BHAVE, K. G., & KHADSE, J. (2023). Genetic evaluation of sperm abnormality traits in Holstein Friesian crossbred bulls using random regression models. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 93(8), 788–794. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v93i8.124814
Citation