Comparison of nutrient intake and digestibility, rumen fermentation along with body weight gain in cattle and buffalo fed maintenance diet
Abstract views: 120 / PDF downloads: 106
Keywords:Body weight, Buffaloes, Cattle, Nutrient intake, Nutrient digestibility, Rumen fermentation, TMR
In the present study, feed and nutrient intake, body weight changes, nutrient digestibility and rumen fermentation parameters were compared in cattle and buffaloes. Seven cattle (T1) and seven buffaloes (T2) were placed in two groups based on body weight employing completely randomized design. Experimental feeding in the form of total mixed ration (TMR) was carried out for 75 days having concentrate (C) and roughage (R) in 30C:70R. The daily intake of dry matter, crude protein, digestible crude protein and total digestible nutrients was non-significant between cattle and buffaloes. While in terms of percentage and metabolic body weight, the same parameters were significantly lower in cattle compared to buffalo. Digestibility of DM, OM, CP, EE, CF, NFE, NDF and ADF marginally differed between cattle and buffaloes. Rumen liquor pH, ammonia, non-protein and soluble nitrogen concentration was non-significantly different between cattle and buffaloes with significant lower value of total volatile fatty acids (12.25 vs. 14.19 mM/dl), total nitrogen (90.53 vs. 101.73 mg/dl) and TCA precipitable nitrogen (51.33 vs. 61.36 mg/dl) in cattle compared to buffaloes. Thus, from the study, it may be concluded that under similar feed and managemental conditions, intake of dry matter and nutrients per unit of body weight was lower, with non-significant difference in nutrients digestibility and inferior nitrogen fermentation as observed in cattle than buffaloes.
Agarwal N, Kamra D N, Chatterjee P N, Kumar R and Chaudhary L C. 2009. In vitro methanogenesis, microbial profile and fermentation of green forages with buffalo rumen liquor as influenced by 2-Bromoethanesulphonic acid. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 21: 818–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70336
AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Virginia, USA.
Barnett A J G and Reid R L. 1957. Studies on production of volatile fatty acids from grass by rumen liquor in artificial rumen, 1. Volatile fatty acid production from fresh grass. Journal of Agricultural Science 48(3): 315–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600031671
Bhatia S K, Pradhan K and Singh. 1992. Effect of feeding wheat straw and oat on rumen microbial and enzymatic activities in cattle and buffalo. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 62: 364–68.
Cantalapiedra-Hijar G, Yanez-Ruiz D R, Martin-Garcia A I and Molina-Alcaide E. 2009. Effect of forage:concentrate ratio and forage type on apparent digestibility, ruminal fermentation and microbial growth in goats. Journal of Animal Science 87: 622–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1142
Chanthakhoun V and Wanapat M. 2012. The in vitro gas production and ruminal fermentation of various feeds using rumen liquor from swamp buffalo and cattle. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 7(1): 54–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2012.54.60
Chanthakhoun V, Wanapat M, Kongmun P and Cherdthong A. 2011. Comparison of ruminal fermentation characteristics and microbial population in swamp buffalo and cattle. Livestock Science 42(3): 116–20.
Chanthakhoun V, Wanapat M, Kongmun P and Cherdthong A. 2012. Comparison of ruminal fermentation characteristics and microbial population in swamp buffalo and cattle. Livestock Science 143(2-3): 172–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.009
Chiariotti A, Edwards J E, Hermes G D A, Catillo G, MeoZilio D, Di Giovanni S, Smidt H and Buttazzoni L. 2020. Increasing the sustainability of maize grain production by using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi does not affect the rumen of dairy cattle (Bos taurus) and Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Frontiers in Veterinary Science 7: 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.556764
Devendra C. 2002. Crop-animal systems in Asia: Future perspectives. Agricultural Systematics 71: 179–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00043-9
Franzolin R and Wright A D G. 2016. Microorganisms in the rumen and reticulum of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fed two different feeding systems. BMC Research Notes 9: 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2046-y
Franzolin R, Rosales F P and Soares W V B. 2010. Effects of dietary energy and nitrogen supplements on rumen fermentation and protozoa population in buffalo and zebu cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootechnia 39: 549–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000300014
Garg M R, Sherasia P L, Phondba B T and Hossain S A. 2014. Effect of feeding a balanced ration on milk production, microbial nitrogen supply and methane emissions in field animals. Animal Production Science 54(10): 1657–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14163
ICAR. 2013. Nutrient Requirements of Cattle and Buffalo. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
Iqbal M W, Zhang Q, Yang Y, Li L, Zou C, Huang C and Lin B. 2018. Comparative study of rumen fermentation and microbial community differences between water buffalo and Jersey cows under similar feeding conditions. Journal of Applied Animal Research 46(1): 740–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1394859
Jabari S, Eslami M, Chaji M, Mohammadabadi T and Bojarpour M. 2014. Comparison of digestibility and protozoa population of Khuzestan water buffalo and Holstein cow. Veterinary Research Forum 5(4): 295–300.
Khejornsart P, Wanapat M and Rowlinson P. 2011. Diversity of anaerobic fungi and rumen fermentation characteristic in swamp buffalo and beef cattle fed on different diets. Livestock Science 139(3): 230–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.01.011
Kudo H, Ho Y W, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S and Cheng K J. 1991. Rumen microflora and its significance to ruminant feeding in the tropics. Utilization of Feed Resources in Relation to Nutrition and Physiology of Ruminants in the Tropics: Tropical Agriculture Research Series No. 25. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tsukuba, Japan
Lane G T, Noller C H, Clendrander V P, Cummings K R and Harzington R B. 1968. Apparatus for obtaining rumino- reticular samples and the effect of sampling location on pH and volatile fatty acids. Journal of Dairy Science 51(1): 114– 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(68)86930-9
Lapitan R M, Del Barrio A N, Katsube O, Tokuda T, Orden E A, Robles A Y and Kanai Y. 2004. Comparison of feed intake, digestibility and fattening performance of Brahman grade cattle (Bos indicus) and crossbred water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Animal Science Journal 75(6): 549–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2004.00226.x
Lwin K O, Kondo M, Ban‐Tokuda T, Lapitan R M, Del‐Barrio A N, Fujihara T and Matsui H. 2012. Ruminal fermentation and microbial ecology of buffaloes and cattle fed the same diet. Animal Science Journal 83(12): 767–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2012.01031.x
Maeda E M, Zeoula L M, Jobim C C, Cecato U, Rigolon L P, Kazama R, Jacobi G and Carvalho A F G. 2012. Intake, digestibility, rumen characteristics and microbial protein synthesis efficiency in bovine and bubaline fed sugar cane silage with additives. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 41(3): 707–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000300034
Malik P K, Trivedi S, Mohapatra A, Kolte A P, Sejian V, Bhatta R and Rahman H. 2021. Comparison of enteric methane yield and diversity of ruminal methanogens in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet. PLoS ONE 16(8): e0256048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256048
NRC. 2021. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Eighth Revised Edition, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Paliwal V K and Sagar V. 1990. Effect of dietary fibre protein on rumen microbial fermentation in cattle and buffalo. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 60: 66–70.
Pant H C and Roy A. 1970. Studies on the rumen microbial activity of buffalo and zebu cattle. Concentrations of micro-organisms and total and particulate nitrogen in the rumen liquor. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 40: 600–09.
Paul S S and Lal D. 2010. Nutrient Requirements of Buffaloes. Satish Serial Publishing House, Delhi. 137p.
Pearson R M and Smith J A B. 1943. The utilization of urea in the bovine rumen. Methods of analysis of the rumen ingesta and preliminary experiments in vitro. Biochemical Journal 37(1): 141–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0370142
Pradhan K, Bhatia S K and Sangwan D C. 1991. Relative rumen ecosystem and nutrient digestibility in cattle and buffalo fed high fibrous diets. Technical Bulletin, Haryana Agricultural University, India.
Rafiei M, Chaji M, Mohammadabadi T and Sari S. 2013. The comparison digestibility of steam treated sugarcane pith by rumen bacteria or rumen microorganisms of Holstein cow and buffalo of Khuzestan. Journal of Ruminant Research 1(1): 53–75.
Ranjhan S K and Pathak N N. 1979. Management and Feeding of Buffaloes. Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi, India. p. 271. Singh A K, Chaturvedi V B, Singh P and Kerketta S. 2018. Assessment of nutrient utilization capacity of crossbred cattle and buffaloes fed diets containing different ratios of concentrate and roughage. International Journal of Livestock Research 8(2): 253–65.
Singh K M, Tripathi A K, Pandya P R, Parnerkar S, Kothari R K and Joshi C G. 2013. Use of real-time PCR technique in determination of major fibrolytic and non-fibrolytic bacteria present in Indian Surti buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Polish Journal of Microbiology 62(2): 195–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2013-025
Sinha S K, Chaturvedi V B, Verma A K, Patil A K and Swati Shivani S. 2016. Effect of feeding total mixed ration on methane emission and energy metabolism in crossbred cattle and buffaloes. Journal of Animal Research 6(1): 59–65.
Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India.
Sousa N H, Franzolin R, Rodrigues P H M and Scoton R A. 2000. Effects of the increasing levels of neutral detergent fiber in the diet on the ruminal fermentation in water buffaloes and cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootechnia 29: 1553–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982000000500038
Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A. 1991. Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74(10): 3583–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Wanapat M, Phesatcha K and Kang S. 2016. Rumen adaptation of swamp buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) by high level of urea supplementation when fed on rice straw-based diet. Tropical Animal Health and Production 48: 1135–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1064-z
Wanapat M, Sommart K, Wachirapakorn C, Uriyapongson S and Wattanachant C. 1994. Recent advances in swamp buffalo nutrition and feeding. Proceedings of 1st Asian Buffalo Association Congress held at KhonKaen University, KhonKaen. pp 221-242.
Wanapat M. 1989. Comparative aspects of digestive physiology and nutrition in buffaloes and cattle, Ruminant Physiology and Nutrition in Asia. (Eds) Devendra C and Imaizumi E. Japanese Society of Zootechnical Science, Sendai
Zanetti M A, Nogueira Filho J C and Oliveira M E M. 1995. Ruminal ammonia levels in Nellore cattle and Mediterranean buffaloes. Proceedings of Annual Reunion of Brazilian Society of Animal Science 32. SBZ, Brasília, pp. 351-352.
How to Cite
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.