Physico-chemical litter amendments and their impact on broiler chicks’ performance
![](/public/icon/gor.png)
![](/public/icon/pdf.png)
Keywords:
Broiler growth, Heat treated litter, Litter quality, Sodium bisulfate abatementAbstract
The objective of the study was to compare the effects of alternative litter treatments on litter quality, growth, carcass traits and welfare of broiler chicks. Day old, commercial broiler chicks (180) having similar body weight range were randomly allocated to two different types of litter treatments, viz. treated litter at the rate of 120°C (T1) and litter treated with sodium bisulfate 25 g/sq. ft. (T2) along with the control group without any litter treatment (T0). Birds of all the treated groups performed better in terms of growth, feed intake and FCR, etc. Cake formation was frequent, highest in T0 followed by T1 and T2 groups which in turn affected the frequency of undesirably poor sanitary outlook of the birds. Significantly lower EPG (E. coli count per gram) count while a numerically lower microbial load of the faecal samples was noted in the T2 than T1 and control. This implied the change in the pH and acidification of litter materials prevented the growth of coccidia and microbial load in the litter, thus making the litter more suitable for bird welfare. It was concluded that chemical litter amendments had a beneficial effect on overall growth performance, carcass characteristics, health and welfare of broiler chicks.
Downloads
References
AOAC International. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. Pp 2004. Analytical chemists. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
Bhatia B B, Pathak K M L and Juyal P D. 2010. Textbook of Veterinary Parasitology. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
California Leafy Green Marketing Agreement. 2010. Commodity specific food safety guidelines for the production and harvest of lettuce and leafy greens. California Leafy Green Marketing Agreement, Sacramento, CA. Accessed March 2011.
Duncan D B. 1995. Multiple range and multiple “F” tests. Biometrics 11: 1–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
Eichner G, Vieira S L, Torres C A, Coneglian J L B, Freitas D M and Oyarzabal O A. 2007. Litter moisture and footpad dermatitis as affected by diets formulated on an all-vegetable basis or having the inclusion of poultry by-product. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16(3): 344–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/16.3.344
Garcia R G, Roriz B C, Nääs I A, Lima N D S, Sgavioli S and Caldara F R. 2019. Multi-attribute evaluation and selection of broiler house for the low prevalence of footpad lesion. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 21(1): 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0643
Hunolt A E, Maguire R O, Ogejo J A, Badgley B D, Frame W H and Reiter M S. 2015. Multiple applications of sodium bisulfate to broiler litter affect ammonia release and litter properties. Journal of Environmental Quality 44(6): 1903–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.05.0214
Line J E. 2002. Campylobacter and Salmonella populations associated with chickens raised on acidified litter. Poultry Science 81: 1473–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.10.1473
McWard G W and Taylor D R. 2000. Acidified clay litter amendment. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 9(4): 518– 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/9.4.518
Miles D M, Branton S L and Lott B D. 2004. Atmospheric ammonia is detrimental to the performance of modern commercial broilers. Poultry Science 83(10): 1650–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.10.1650
National Organic Program. 2006. National Organic Standards Board Crops Committee recommendation for guidance: use of compost, vermicompost, processed manure and compost tea. National Organic Program, Washington, DC. Accessed February 2011.
Proch A, Malik D S, Singh Y, Sandhu K S, Sharma A and Sethi A P S. 2019. Effect of litter and dietary amendments on ammonia concentration, broiler performance and litter quality in winter. Indian Journal of Animal Research 53(7): 973–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/IJAR.B-3619
Sahoo S P, Kaur D, Sethi A P S, Sharma A, Chandra M and Chandrahas. 2017. Effect of chemically amended litter on litter quality and broiler performance in winter. Journal of Applied Animal Research 45(1): 533–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2016.1150846
Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. 8th Edn. pp 313. Iowa state University Press Ames, Iowa, USA.
Thomas P, Sekhar A C and Mujawar M M. 2012. Nonrecovery of varying proportions of viable bacteria during spread plating governed by the extent of spreader usage and proposal for an alternate spotting‐spreading approach to maximize the CFU. Journal of Applied Microbiology 113(2): 339–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05327.x
Villagra A, Olivas I, Benitez V and Lainez M. 2011. Evaluation of sludge from paper recycling as bedding material for broilers. Poultry Science 90(5): 953–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00935
Wei S, Gutek A, Lilburn M and Yu Z. 2013. Abundance of pathogens in the gut and litter of broiler chickens as affected by bacitracin and litter management. Veterinary Microbiology 166: 595–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.06.006
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.