Association of serum anti-mullerian hormone concentration with fertility status of crossbred (Vrindavani) cows


426 / 533

Authors

  • ATHIDI LOKAVYA GANGULA ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • MANAS KUMAR PATRA ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • BRIJESH KUMAR ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • HITESH ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • KALPENDRA KOHLI ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • PRADEEP CHANDRA ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • NARAYANAN KRISHNASWAMY ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • GYANENDRA KUMAR GAUR ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • HARENDRA KUMAR ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v94i3.128320

Keywords:

Anti-Mullerian hormone, Crossbred cow, Estrus, Fertility

Abstract

Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is considered a biomarker of ovarian follicular reserve and fertility in humans and farm animals. A study was carried out to evaluate the peripheral AMH concentration in high and low fertile crossbred cows. Vrindavani crossbred cows (n=60) at the institutional dairy farm were used for the study. The age-specific decline in AMH concentration was evident, with the highest concentration at 4-6 years (134.8±17.74 pg/mL) corresponding to second to third parity. Retrospective assessment of fertility using 217 lactation records in crossbred cows revealed that circulatory AMH was higher by 69 pg/mL in the high fertile cows than those of low fertile cows. It was concluded that the serum AMH concentration was influenced by age and parity. Further, serum AMH concentrations were found to be higher in the group of cows that had superior fertility records in comparison to the group with low-performing animals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbarinejad V, Gharagozlou F, Vojgani M and Ranji A. 2020. Evidence for quadratic association between serum anti- Mullerian hormone (AMH) concentration and fertility in dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 218: 106457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106457

Ali H E, Kitahara G, Takahashi T, Mido S, Sadawy M, Kobayashi I, Hemmi K and Osawa T 2017. Plasma anti- Müllerian hormone profile in heifers from birth through puberty and relationship with puberty onset. Biology of Reproduction 97: 153–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/iox069

Almeida F R, Costermans N G, Soede N M, Bunschoten A, Keijer J, Kemp B and Teerds K J. 2018. Presence of anti- Müllerian hormone (AMH) during follicular development in the porcine ovary. PLoS One 13(7): e0197894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197894

Alward K J and Bohlen J F. 2020. Overview of anti müllerian hormone (AMH) and association with fertility in female cattle. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 55: 3–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13583

Amanvermez R and Tosun M. 2016. An update on ovarian aging and ovarian reserve tests. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility 9: 411.

Baldrighi J M, Sa Filho M F, Batista E O S, Lopes R N V R, Visintin J A, Baruselli P S and Assumpçao M E O A. 2014. Anti mullerian hormone concentration and antral ovarian follicle population in murrah heifers compared to Holstein and Gir kept under the same management. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 49: 1015–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12430

Berry D P, Wall E and Pryce J E. 2014. Genetics and genomics of reproductive performance in dairy and beef cattle. Animal 8: 105–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000743

Claes A, Ball B A, Corbin C J and Conley A J. 2014. Anti-Müllerian hormone as a diagnostic marker for equine cryptorchidism in three cases with equivocal testosterone concentrations. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 34: 442–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2013.09.001

Domain G, Buczkowska J, Kalak P, Wydooghe E, Banchi P, Pascottini O B and Van Soom A. 2022. Serum anti-mullerian hormone: a potential semen quality biomarker in stud dogs? Animals 12: 323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030323

Durlinger A L, Gruijters M J, Kramer P, Karels B, Kumar T R, Matzuk M M, Rose U M, de Jong F H, Uilenbroek J T, Grootegoed J A and Themmen A P. 2001. Anti-Mullerian hormone attenuates the effects of FSH on follicle development in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology 142: 4891–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.142.11.8486

Gobikrushanth M, Purfield D C, Canadas E R, Herlihy M M, Kenneally J, Murray M and Butler S T. 2019. Anti -Müllerian hormone in grazing dairy cows: Identification of factors affecting plasma concentration, relationship with phenotypic fertility, and genome-wide associations. Journal of Dairy Science 102:11622–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16979

Gobikrushanth M, Purfield D C, Colazo M G, Butler S T, Wang Z and Ambrose D J. 2018. The relationship between serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations and fertility and genome- wide associations for anti-Müllerian hormone in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 101: 7563–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13940

Haldar A, De S, Gautam D, Pal P and Brar P S. 2020. Age-specific peripheral anti-müllerian hormone concentration in buffaloes. Journal of Animal Research 10: 725–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30954/2277-940X.05.2020.8

Haldar A, Sachinandan D, Singh V, Datta M, Pal P and Prakash B S. 2019. Age-specific peripheral anti-müllerian hormone concentrations in goats (Capra hircus). Indian Journal of Animal Research 53(5): 599–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.B-3569

Hollinshead F K, Walker C and Hanlon D W. 2017. Determination of the normal reference interval for anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in bitches and use of AMH as a potential predictor of litter size. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 52: 35–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12822

Ireland J J, Zielak-Steciwko A E, Jimenez-Krassel F, Folger J, Bettegowda A, Scheetz D and Evans A C O. 2009. Variation in the ovarian reserve is linked to alterations in intra-follicular oestradiol production and ovarian biomarkers of follicular differentiation and oocyte quality in cattle. Biology of Reproduction 80(5): 954–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.073791

Ireland J J, Smith G W, Scheetz D, Jimenez-Krassel F, Folger J K, Ireland J L H, Mossa F, Lonergan P and Evans A C O. 2010. Does size matter in females? An overview of the impact of the high variation in the ovarian reserve on ovarian function and fertility, utility of anti-Mullerian hormone as a diagnostic marker for fertility and causes of variation in the ovarian reserve in cattle. Reproduction Fertility and Development 23: 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/RD10226

Jimenez-Krassel F, Folger J K, Ireland J L H, Smith G W, Hou X, Davis J S and Ireland J. 2009. Evidence that high variation in ovarian reserves of healthy young adults has a negative impact on the corpus luteum and endometrium during estrous cycles in cattle. Biology of Reproduction 80: 1272–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.075093

Jimenez-Krassel F, Scheetz D M, Neuder L M, Ireland J L H, Pursley J R, Smith G W and Ireland J J. 2015. Concentration of anti-Mullerian hormone in dairy heifers is positively associated with productive herd life. Journal of Dairy Science 98(5): 3036–45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8130

Kevenaar M E, Meerasahib M F, Kramer P, Van de Lang-Born B M, de Jong F H, Groome N P and Visser J A. 2006. Serum anti-mullerian hormone levels reflect the size of the primordial follicle pool in mice. Endocrinology 147: 3228–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2005-1588

Monniaux D, Drouilhet L, Rico C, Estienne A, Jarrier P, Touze JL, Sapa J, Phocas F, Dupont J and Dalbies-Tran R. 2013. Regulation of anti Mullerian hormone production in domestic animals. Reproduction Fertility and Development 25: 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/RD12270

Morris D Y and Diskin M. 2008. Effect of progesterone on embryo survival. Animal 2(8): 1112–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108002474

Mossa F, Jimenez-Krassel F, Janet L H and Evans A C O. 2010. Evidence that high variation in antral follicle count during follicular waves is linked to alterations in ovarian. Reproduction 140: 713–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-10-0214

National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Seventh Revised Edition, Washington, DC, The National Academies Press.

Nawaz M, Jimenez-Krassel F, Steibel J, Lu Y, Baktula A, Vukasinovic N and Tempelman R. 2018. Genomic heritability and genome-wide association analysis of anti-müllerian hormone in Holstein dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 101: 8063–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14798

Papas M, Govaere J, Peere S, Gerits, Van de Velde M, Angel- Velez D and Smits K. 2021. Anti-müllerian hormone and opu- icsi outcome in the Mare. Animals 11(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11072004

Ribeiro E S, Bisinotto R S, Lima F S, Greco L F, Morrison A, Kumar A and Santos J E. 2014. Plasma anti-mullerian hormone in adult dairy cows and associations with fertility. Journal of Dairy Science 11: 6888–900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-7908

Rico C, Fabre S, Médigue C, Clemente N D, Clement F, Bontoux M and Monniaux D. 2009. Anti-Müllerian hormone is an endocrine marker of ovarian gonadotropin-responsive follicles and can help to predict superovulatory responses in the cow. Biology of Reproduction 80(1): 50–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.072157

Souza A H, Carvalho P D, Rozner A E, Vieira L M, Hackbart K S, Bender R W and Wiltbank M C. 2015. Relationship between circulating anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and super ovulatory response of high-producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 98: 169–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8182

Spencer T E, Burghardt R C, Johnson G A and Bazer F W. 2004. Conceptus signals for establishment and maintenance of pregnancy. Animal Reproduction Science 82-83: 537–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.014

Steel A, Athorn R Z and Grupen C G. 2018. Anti-Mullerian hormone and Oestradiol as markers of future reproductive success in juvenile gilts. Animal Reproduction Science 195: 197–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.05.024

Visser J A, Durlinger A L, Peters I J, Van den Heuvel E R, Rose U M, Kramer P and Themmen A P. 2007. Increased oocyte degeneration and follicular atresia during the estrous cycle in anti-Mullerian hormone null mice. Endocrinology 148: 2301–08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2006-1265

Downloads

Published

2024-03-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

GANGULA, A. L. ., PATRA, M. K. ., KUMAR, B. ., HITESH, KOHLI, K. ., CHANDRA, P. ., KRISHNASWAMY, N. ., GAUR, G. K. ., & KUMAR, H. . (2024). Association of serum anti-mullerian hormone concentration with fertility status of crossbred (Vrindavani) cows. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 94(3), 238–242. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v94i3.128320
Citation