Behavioural changes of Murrah buffalo calves under various upbringing systems
![](/public/icon/gor.png)
![](/public/icon/pdf.png)
![](/public/icon/pdf.png)
Keywords:
Animal welfare, Buffalo calves, Lying time, Rubber mat, Sleeping time, Wheat strawAbstract
In present study, an effort was undertaken to estimate the “Effect of different bedding materials on the behaviour of Murrah buffalo calves”. Twenty buffalo calves (below 4 months of age) were divided into four groups (5 calves in each group), viz. T1: Concrete floor; T2: Concrete floor bedded with sand, T3: Concrete floor bedded with wheat straw, and T4: Concrete floor bedded with rubber mat. Recording of daily activities of calves throughout 8 h (8:00 am to 4:00 pm) for each month (December, January, and February) of two consecutive days representing time spent for particular behavioural activity along with total time spent in the covered area and the open area was recorded. Throughout the trial, a variety of behavioural activities of calves in all treatments was examined. The time spent by calves in the covered area was considerably greater in T3, followed by T1 and T4, and least in the T2 group. Calves raised on the floor made of wheat straw had significantly more lying time in the covered area than those raised on the floor made of rubber mat, concrete, or sand. Similar sleep duration was considerably longer in T3 and T4 than in T2, although the difference between T4 and T1 was not significant. Compared to T1 and T2, moving time in the enclosed area was noticeably shorter in T3 and T4. Feeding time in T3 was likewise noticeably longer than in T1 and T2, although it was not significantly different from T4. The results showed that the T3, T4, and T1, respectively had the best microclimate conditions for calves during the winter, whereas T2 had the poorer microclimatic condition.
Downloads
References
Absmanner E, Rouha-Mulleder C, Scharl T, Leisch F and Troxler J. 2009. Effects of different housing systems on the behaviour of beef bulls- An on-farm assessment on Austrian farms. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118: 12–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.009
Brouillette J and Spanski N. 1998. Cow comfort and the effects on productivity and profitability. Hudson Valley Agricultural Newsletter. 2 p. 1.
Camiloti T V, Fregonesi J A, von Keyserlingk M A G and Weary D M. 2012. Short communication: Effects of bedding quality on the lying behaviour of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 95(6): 3380–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5187
Chua B, Coenen E, van Delen J and Weary D M. 2002. Effects of pair versus individual housing on the behaviour and performance of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 85(2): 360–64 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74082-4
Earley B, McDonnell B and G O’Riordan E. 2015. Effect of floor type on the performance, physiological and behavioural responses of finishing beef steers. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 57: 73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-015-0162-7
Ewbank R. 1985. Behavioural responses to stress in farm animals. G. P. Moberg (Eds) Animal Stress, Springer NewYork, pp. 71-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7544-6_5
Fregonesi J A, Veira D M, von Keyserlingk M A and Weary D M. 2007. Effects of bedding quality on lying behavior of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90(12): 5468–472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0494
Hanninen L, de Passille A M and Rushen J. 2005. The effect of flooring type and social grouping on the rest and growth of dairy calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 91(3): 193– 204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.10.003
Hill, T M, Bateman H G, Aldrich J M, and Schlotterbeck R L. 2011. Comparisons of housing, bedding, and cooling options for dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 94(4): 2138–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3841
Jain, S K, Mahale D M and Thakor N J. 2013. Effect of rubber mats on comfort of dairy animals. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering 6(2): 463–68.
Jat R P and Yadav B L. 2010. Growth and behavioural pattern of buffalo calves under different shelter modification during winter. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80(7): 686–89.
Kartal T Z and Yanar M. 2011. Effect of floor types on the growth performance and some behavioural traits of Brown Swiss calves. Veterinarijair Zootechnika 55(77): 20-24.
Lane J. 2006. Can non-invasive glucocorticoid measures be used as reliable indicators of stress in animals? Animal Welfare 15(4): 331–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600030657
Lowe D E, Steen R W J, Beattie V E and Moss B W. 2001. The effects of floor type systems on the performance cleanliness carcass composition and meat quality of housed finishing beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 69: 33–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00246-3
Madke P K, Lathwal S S, Singh Y, Kumar A and Vinay K. 2010. Study of behavioural and physiological changes of crossbred cows under different shelter management practices. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80(8): 771–74.
Mogensen L, Krohn C C, Sorensen J T, Hindhede J and Nielsen L H. 1997. Association between resting behaviour and live weight gain in dairy heifers housed in pens with different space allowance and floor type. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 55: 11–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00041-5
Panivivat R, Kegley E B, Pennington J A, Kellog D W and Krumpelman S L. 2004. Growth performance and health of dairy calves bedded with different types of materials. Journal of Dairy Science 87(11): 3736–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73512-2
Rushen J, Haley D and de Passillé A M. 2007. Effect of softer flooring in tie stalls on resting behaviour and leg injuries of lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 3647–651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-463
Sadharakiya K and Sorathiya L. 2019. Effects of Rubber Mat Flooring on Behaviours, Welfare, and Production Performance in Crossbred Cows. International Journal of Livestock Research 9(1): 195–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20180709055929
Sorathiya L M, Raval A P, Kharad V B, Tyagi K K and Patel M D. 2019. Effect of flooring on growth performance, behaviour, health, and economics in surti buffalo calves during winter. Indian Journal of Animal Science 89(11): 1246–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i11.95881
SPSS. 2007. Statistical Packages for Social Sciences. Version 16, SPSS Inc., llinois, USA.
Telezhenko E, Lidfors L and Bergsten C. 2007. Dairy cow preferences for soft or hard flooring when standing or walking. Journal of Dairy Science 90 (8): 3716–724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-876
Tucker C B, Weary D M and Fraser D. 2003. Effects of three types of free-stall surfaces on preferences and stall usage by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86 (2): 521–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73630-3
Vanegas J, Overton M, Berry S L and Sischo W M. 2006. Effect of rubber flooring on claw health in lactating dairy cows housed in free-stall barns. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 4251–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72471-7
Wathes C M, Jones C D R and Webster A J F. 1983. Ventilation, air hygiene and animal health. The Veterinary Record 113: 554–59.
Webster J. 1984. Calf Husbandry, Health and Welfare. Collins, London, UK.
Wilson L L, Terosky T L, Stull C L and Stricklin W R. 1999. Effects of individual housing design and size on behaviour and stress indicators of special-fed Holstein veal calves. Journal of Animal Science 77: 1341–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7761341x
Yarnar M, Kartal T Z, Aydin R, Kocyigit R and Diler A. 2010. Effect of different floor types on growth performance and some behaviour traits of Holstein Friesian calves. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 20(3): 175–79.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.