Effect of cage space allowance on egg production, egg quality, immune responses and anti-oxidant variables in White Leghorn layers

S V RAMA RAO; B PRAKASH; M V L N RAJU; U RAJKUMAR; R N CHATTERJEE

doi:10.56093/ijans.v93i6.128977

Authors

S V RAMA RAO ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
B PRAKASH ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
M V L N RAJU ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
U RAJKUMAR ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
R N CHATTERJEE ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v93i6.128977

Keywords:

Anti-oxidant variables, Cage space allowance, Egg production, Immunity, Laying chicken

Abstract

A comprehensive study was conducted to optimise cage space allowance (CSA) for White Leghorn (WL) layers (65-80 weeks of age). For the purpose, a total of 900 layers were housed in California colony cages in an open sided poultry house at three different CSA (422, 563, 844 cm2/bird). Each of the CSA was studied with 20 replicates. The daily egg production (EP), feed intake (FI), feed efficiency (FE, FI/egg mass) and egg quality traits were recorded at the end of each 28d interval. Anti-oxidant responses like lipid peroxidation (LP) and glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase and superoxide dismutase in blood were measured at 80 weeks of age. Similarly, the antibody titres against ND vaccine and cell mediated immune response (CMI) against PHA- P were measured at 80 weeks of age. The variation in CSA did not influence EP, egg mass, weight gain and egg shell thickness. The FI reduced and FE improved with reduction in CSA. However, the egg density and egg shell percentage increased with increase in CSA. The LP was higher and the activities of anti-oxidant enzymes were lower at 422 cm2/bird as compared to the higher space allowances. No effect of CSA on ND titre was observed, while the CMI response was higher at 844 cm2/ bird than the other two CSA. It could be concluded that, though the FE was better at 422 cm2/b, the trends of shell quality traits and antioxidant variables indicated 546 cm2/bird as requirement for WL layers in open sided poultry house under tropical regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams A W and Craig J V. 1985. Effect of crowding and cage shape on productivity and profitability of caged layers: A Survey. Poultry Science 64: 238–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0640238

Anderson K E, Davis G S, Jenkins P K and Carroll A S. 2004. Effect of bird age, density and molt on behavioural profiles of two commercial layer strains in cages. Poultry Science 83: 15–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.1.15

Azad K S, Shariatmadari F, Karimi Torshizi M A and Ahmadi H. 2017. Effect of zinc concentration and source on performance, tissue mineral status, activity of superoxide dismutase enzyme and lipid peroxidation of meat in broiler chickens. Animal Production Science 58: 1837–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15758

Campbell D L M, Lee C, Hinch G N and Roberts J R. 2017. Egg production and egg quality in free-range laying hens housed at different outdoor stocking densities. Poultry Science 96: 3128–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex107

Carey J B, Kuo F L and Anderson K E. 1995. Effects of cage population on the productive performance of layers. Poultry Science 74: 633–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0740633

Corrier D E and Deloach J R. 1990. Evaluation of cell-mediated, cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity in young chickens by an interdigital skin test. Poultry Science 69: 403–08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690403

Cunningham D L and Ostrander C E. 1982. The effects of strain and cage shape and density on performance and fearfulness of white leghorn layers. Poultry Science 61: 239–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0610239

Cunningham D L, Van Tienhoven A and Gvaryahu G. 1988. Population size, cage area, and dominance rank effects on productivity and well-being of laying hens. Poultry Science 67(3): 399–-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0670399

Davami A, Wineland M J, Jones W T, Ilardi R L and Peterson R A. 1987. Effects of population size, floor space, and feeder space upon productive performance, external appearance, and plasma corticosterone concentration of laying hens. Poultry Science 66: 251–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0660251

Ethelbert U, Ezeji A, Ernest A, Anyalogbu N, Tobias E and Udensi J U. 2012. Determination of reduced glutathione and glutathione s-transferase of poultry birds exposed to permethrin insecticide. American Journal of Biochemistry 2(3): 21–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ajb.20120203.01

Gawel S, Wardas M, Niedworok E and Wardas P. 2004. Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a lipid peroxidation marker. Wiadomosci Lekarskie 57: 453–55.

Hill A T. 1977. The effects of space allowance and group size on egg production traits and profitability. British Poultry Science 17: 483–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071667708416388

Jahanian R and Mirfendereski E. 2015. Effects of high stocking density on performance, egg quality, and plasma and yolk antioxidant capacity in laying hens supplemented with organic chromium and vitamin C. Livestock Science 177: 117–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.04.022

Jendral M J, Korver D R, Church J S and Feddes J J R. 2008. Bone mineral density and breaking strength of white leghorns housed in conventional, modified and commercially available colony battery cages. Poultry Science 87: 828–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00192

Lee K. 1989. Laying performance and fear response of white leghorns as influenced by floor space allowance and group size. Poultry Science 68: 1333–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0681332

Okpokho N A, Craig J V and Milliken G A. 1987. Density and group size effects on cage hens of two genetic cage s differing in escape and avoidance behaviour. Poultry Science 66: 1905–1910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0661905

Ouart M D and Adams A W. 1982. Effect of cage design and bird density on layers. 1. Productivity, feathering and nervousness. Poultry Science 61: 1606–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0611606

Paglia D E and Valantine W N. 1967. Studies on quantitative characterization of erythrocytes glutathione peroxidase. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 79: 158–69.

Placer Z A, Cushman L and Johnson B C. 1966. Estimation of product lipid peroxidation (malonyldialdehyde) in biochemical systems. Analytical Biochemistry 16: 359–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(66)90167-9

Rama Rao S V, Ravindran V, Raju M V L N, Srilatha T and Panda A K. 2014. Effect of different concentrations of metabolizable energy and protein on performance of White Leghorn layers in a tropical climate. British Poultry Science 55: 532–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.935997

Rama Rao S V, Ravindran V, Srilatha T, Panda A K and Raju M V L N. 2011. Effect of dietary concentrations of energy, crude protein, lysine and methionine on performance of White Leghorn layers in the tropics. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 20: 528–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2011-00355

Reynolds D L and Maraqa A D. 2000. Protective immunity against Newcastle disease: the role of antibodies specific to Newcastle disease virus polypeptides. Avian Diseases 4: 138–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1592517

Rhim and Jae S. 2014. Effect of floor space on the behaviour of laying hens in commercial cages. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias 27: 95–101.

Rios R L, Bertechini A G, Carvalho J C C, Castro S F and Costa V A. 2009. Effect of cage density on the performance of 25-84 week-old laying hens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2009000400007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2009000400007

Saki A A, Zamani P, Rahmati M and Mahmoudi M. 2012. The effect of cage density on laying hen performance, egg quality, and excreta minerals. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 21: 467–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00318

Sarica M, Boga S and Yamak U S. 2008. The effects of space allowance on egg yield, egg quality and plumage condition of laying hens in battery cages. Czech Journal of Animal Science 53: 346–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/349-CJAS

Simsek U G, Ciftci M, Dogan G and Ozcelik M. 2013. Antioxidant activity of cinnamon bark oil (Cinnamomum zeylanicum L.) in Japanese quails under thermos-neutral and heat stressed conditions. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi 19: 889–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2013.9049

Tactacan G B, Guenter W, Lewis N J, Rodriguez-Lecompte J C and House J D. 2009. Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages. Poultry Science 88: 698– 707. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00369

Widowski T M, Caston L J, Hunniford M E, Cooley L and Torrey S. 2017. Effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages, Part I: Performance and well-being. Poultry Science 96: 3805–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex197