Evaluation of forage qualities of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under varying jeevamrit formulations and their spraying interval
221 / 213 / 31
Keywords:
Forage quality, Jeevamrit, Natural farming, Proximate constitutes, RFQAbstract
An experiment was conducted at ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom to generate precise information about different jeevamrit formulation and their spraying interval on forage quality of fodder sorghum during summer season of 2022. The treatments consisted of three jeevamrit formulations viz. jeevamrit-1 (5 kg cow dung + 2.5 litre cow urine), jeevamrit-2 (10 kg cow dung + 5 litre cow urine) and jeevamrit-3 (15 kg cow dung + 7.5 litre cow urine); and three spraying intervals viz. spraying at every one week’s interval, spraying at every two week’s interval and spraying at every three week’s interval. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with three replications. The results showed that among the different jeevamrit formulations, jeevamrit-3
and among the different spraying intervals, spraying at every one week’s interval recorded maximum total dry matter yield, crude protein, ether extract, TDN content, dry matter intake, relative feed quality, net energy for lactation, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content in forage sorghum. However, among the different jeevamrit formulations, jeevamrit-2 and jeevamrit-3; and among the different spraying intervals, spraying of jeevamirt at every one week and every two week’s interval recorded at par values of all the nutritive parameters in fodder sorghum.
Downloads
References
AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis, Eighteenth revised. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Aulakh C S, Singh H, Walia S S, Phutela R P and Singh G. 2013. Evaluation of microbial culture (Jeevamrit) preparation and its effect on productivity of field crops. Indian Journal of Agronomy 58(2): 182–86.
Aulakh C S, Singh H, Walia S S, Phutela R P and Singh G. 2018. Effect of farmyard manure and jeevamrit in maize–wheat organic production system in Punjab. Agricultural Research Journal 55(3): 485–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2395-146X.2018.00087.X
Carmi A, Aharoni Y, Edelstein M, Umiel N, Hagiladi A, Yosef E, Nikbachat M, Zenou A and Miron J. 2006. Effects of irrigation and plant density on yield, composition and in vitro digestibility of a new forage sorghum variety, Tal, at two maturity stages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131: 120–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.02.005
Choudhary R, Kumar R, Sharma G D, Sharma R P, Rana N and Dev P. 2022. Effect of natural farming on yield performances, soil health and nutrient uptake in wheat + gram intercropping system in sub-temperate regions of Himachal Pradesh. Journal of Crop and Weed 18(2): 01–08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/09746315.2022.v18.i2.1566
Devakumar N, Shubha S, Gouder S B and Rao G G E. 2014. Microbial analytical studies of traditional organic preparations- beejamrutha and jeevamrutha. Proceedings of the 4th ISOFAR Scientific Conference, ‘Building Organic Bridges’ held at the Organic World Congress 2014, 13-15 Oct., Istanbul, Turkey.
Devakumar N, Rao G G E, Shubha S, Khan I, Nagaraj and Gowda S B. 2008. Activates of Organic Farming Research Centre. Navile, Shimoga, University of Agriculture Sciences Bengaluru, page no. 12.
Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Int. Rice Res. Inst., John Wiley and Sons. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore.
Gore N S and Sreenivasa M N. 2011. Influence of liquid organic manures on growth, nutrient content and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in the sterilized soil. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24: 153–57.
Horrocks R D and Vallentine J F. 1999. Harvested Forages. Academic Press, London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012356255-5/50027-4
Jeranyama P and Garcia A D. 2004. Understanding relative feedvalue (RFV) and relative forage quality (RFQ). Extension Extra, Cooperative Extension Service. SDSU. http://agbiopubs.sdstate.edu/articles/ExEx8149.pdf
Joshi M. 2012. New Vistas of Organic Farming. Scientific Publishers, New Delhi, pp 140.
Kaur P, Saini J P, Meenakshi and Avnee. 2021. Optimization of jeevamrit doses and application time for enhancing productivity of wheat under natural farming system. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 10(1): 405–08.
Lampkin N. 1990. Organic farming, Ipswich, UK: Farming Press, 214–271.
Lithourgidis A S, Vasilakoglou I B, Dhima K V, Dordas C A and Yiakoulaki M D. 2006. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research 99: 106–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.03.008
Maity P, Rijal R and Kumar A. 2020. Application of liquid manures on growth of various crops: A Review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, Special Issue-11: 1601–11.
Mohammed, Maarouf I. 2010. Sorghum for feed and fodder production. Regional workshop on optimum industrial utilization of sorghum in Sudan. IRCC. 18-19 April 2010. Khartoum North. Sudan.
Ondarza M B D. 2000. Energy. Paradox Nutrition. Nutrition consulting for the dairy industry. http://www.milkproduction.com/Library/Scientific articles/Nutrition/Energy/
Rahman S. 2015. Green Revolution in India: Environmental Degradation and Impact on Livestock. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution 12(1): 75-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-150010
Richards L A. 1968. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. U. S. D. A. Handbook No. 60, Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi.
Sutar R, Sujith G M and Devakumar N. 2018. Growth and yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] as influenced by jeevamrutha and panchagavya application. Legume Research 3932: 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-3932
Undersander D, Moore J E and Schneider N. 2010. Relative forage quality. Focus on Forage 12 (6): 1-3.
Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Sciences 74(10): 3583–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.