Evaluation of Native and Kadaknath chicken for production performance, egg quality traits and farmers acceptability in Western Himalayan region of Himachal Pradesh, India


Abstract views: 93 / PDF downloads: 368

Authors

  • KRISHANENDER DINESH Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062 India
  • V SANKHYAN Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062 India
  • D THAKUR Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062 India
  • S KATOCH Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062 India
  • S KUMAR Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062 India
  • N BHARDWAJ Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v94.i1.134434

Keywords:

Egg quality, Field survey, Kadaknath, Native, Production performance

Abstract

The present study evaluated production performance and egg quality traits of native and Kadaknath chicken of Himachal Pradesh under sub-temperate western Himalayan region of India. External egg quality traits like egg weight, egg length, egg width, shell thickness and internal traits like length, height, width of albumen, yolk height, and yolk width were measured. Body weight of native and Kadaknath birds differed significantly at different age of measurements and body weight of native birds was significantly higher than Kadaknath. Age at sexual maturity was found less in native birds in comparison to Kadaknath. HHEP and HDEP was observed higher in native birds than Kadaknath. Mean value estimated for egg weight, egg length, egg width, shape index and shell thickness were 45.33 g, 54.99 mm, 41.27 mm, 75.02% and 0.36 mm, respectively in native eggs while corresponding values were 43.87 g, 53.61 mm, 40.80 mm, 76.20% and 0.34 mm, respectively in Kadaknath eggs. Albumen length, albumen width, yolk height and yolk index is observed significantly higher in native birds than Kadaknath. Appraisal of farm practices through field survey suggests that Kadaknath birds witnessed rising popularity in recent times. However, native birds of the region are better producers in comparison to Kadaknath. This suggests that native birds may be preferred over Kadaknath birds in similar regions where premium pricing of Kadaknath is unavailable. Occasionally peri-urban market offered opportunity of premium pricing based income through sale of Kadaknath birds. Thus, rearing of Kadaknath along with native birds is advised in such regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alireza A, Gheisari A and Nabinejad A. 2015. Evaluation of native chicken performance in rural areas of Isfahan province. Animal Science Journal 28(1): 147–56.

Ansari V A, Kumar A, Dar A H, Singh B, Kumar S and Singh S K. 2021. Studies on productive and egg quality traits of Uttara chicken breed. Biological Rhythm Research 52(5): 702–09.

Bhagora N J, Mishra R, Savaliya F P, Patel A B and Lonkar V S. 2022. Production performance, phenotypic and carcass quality sensory evaluation of Kadaknath, Rhode Island Red chicken and their reciprocal crosses. Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology 18(1): 54–60.

Dalal D S, Ratwan P and Yadav A S. 2022. Genetic evaluation of growth, production and reproduction traits in Aseel and Kadaknath chickens in agroclimatic conditions of northern India. Biological Rhythm Research 53(1): 40–49.

Dinesh K, Sankhyan V, Thakur Y P, Kumar R and Singh S G. 2018. Estimation of phenotypic trend in performance traits of native chicken germplasm of Himachal Pradesh. Journal of Animal Research 8(6): 1071–074.

Dinesh K, Sankhyan V, Thakur Y P, Thakur D and Kumar R. 2021. Comparative performance evaluation of dahlem red, native and their crosses under intensive management in Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 91(10): 856–59.

Dinesh K, Sankhyan V, Thakur D, Verma N and Bhardwaj N. 2022. Effect of age on egg quality traits of Dahlem Red chicken under intensive system of management in Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 92(3): 347–52.

Gheyas A A, Vallejo-Trujillo A, Kebede A, Lozano-Jaramillo D T, Smith J and Hanotte O. 2021. Integrated environmental and genomic analysis reveals the drivers of local adaptation in African Indigenous Chickens. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38: 4268–285.

Giri S C and Sahoo S K. 2012. Performance of Gramapriya chicken under extensive and intensive system of management. The Indian Veterinary Journal 89: 52–55.

Hanusova E, Hrncar C, Hanus A and Oravcova M. 2015. Effect of breed on some parameters of egg quality in laying hens. Actafytotechn Zootechnica 18(1): 20–24.

Haunshi S, Dooley S and Shakuntala I. 2009. Production performance of indigenous chicken of northeastern region and improved varieties developed for backyard farming. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 79: 901–05.

Haunshi S, Niranjan M, Shanmugam M, Padhi M K, Reddy M R, Sunitha R, Rajkumar U and Panda A K. 2011. Characterization of two Indian native chicken breeds for production, egg and semen quality and welfare traits. Poultry Science 90: 314–20.

Haunshi S, Padhi M K, Niranjan M, Rajkumar U, Shanmugam M and Chatterjee R N. 2013. Comparative evaluation of native breeds of chicken for persistency of egg production, egg quality and biochemical traits. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83(1): 59–62.

Haunshi S and Prince L L L. 2021. Kadaknath: A popular native chicken breed of India with unique black colour characteristics. World’s Poultry Science Journal 77(2): 427–40.

Jaishankar S, Priya R J, Sheeba A and Ilavarasan S. 2020. Productive and reproductive performance of Kadaknath chicken under semi-intensive system. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 9(4): 513–17.

Jayanaik S N, Nagaraj C S, Malathi V and Gopinath C R. 2021. External and internal egg quality traits of indigenous chicken of Gulbarga division reared under field conditions. The Pharma Innovation Journal 10(4): 227–30.

Jha D K, Prashad S, Patel N and Baskar K. 2013. Comparative evaluation of Dahlem Red and desi cross chicken under intensive system of Poultry management. International Journal of Agricultural Technology 9(6): 1405–410.

Kalita N, Gawande S S and Barua N. 2009. Production and reproduction performance of indigenous chicken of Assam under rural condition. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 44: 253–55.

Kalita N, Pathak N and Ahmed M. 2017. Comparative evaluation of various traits of PB-2 x indigenous and Dahlem Red chicken under intensive system of rearing. Journal of Entomology. Zoological Studies 5(6): 156–59.

Kalita N, Gawande S S and Barua N. 2018. Production and reproduction performance of indigenous chicken of Assam under rural condition. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 44(2): 253–55.

Kumar B, Kumar H and Singh S K. 2020. Comparative study of egg quality traits in chicken varieties for backyard farming in Jharkhand. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 8(4): 1565–569.

Kumar M, Dahiya S P, Ratwan P, Sheoran N, Kumar S and Kumar N. 2022. Assessment of egg quality and biochemical parameters of Aseel and Kadaknath indigenous chicken breeds of India under backyard poultry farming. Poultry Science 101: 101589.

Niranjan M, Sharma R P, Rajkumar U, Reddy B L N, Chatterjee R N and Bhattacharya T K. 2008. Comparative evaluation of production performance in improved chicken varieties for backyard farming. International Journal of Poultry Science 7(11): 1128–131.

Padhi M K, Chatterjee R N, Haunshi S and Rajkumar U. 2013. Effect of age on egg quality in chicken. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 48(1): 122–25.

Padhi M K, Chatterjee R N and Haunshi S. 2014. Age effects on egg quality traits in a 3-way cross egg type chicken developed for backyard poultry farming. Journal of Poultry Science and Technology 2(3): 52–55.

Pathak P, Dubey P P, Dash S K and Chaudhary M L. 2015. Studies on growth and carcass traits of Aseel and Kadaknath chicken. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 50(3): 327–28.

Rajaravindra K S, Rajkumar U, Rekha K, Niranjan M, Reddy B L N and Chatterjee R N. 2015. Evaluation of egg quality traits in a synthetic coloured broiler female line. Journal of Applied Animal Research 43(1): 10–14.

Rajkumar U, Raju M V L N, Niranjan M, Haunshi S, Padhi M K and Rama Rao S V. 2014. Evaluation of egg quality traits in native Aseel chicken. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 49(3): 324–27.

Rajkumar U, Rama Rao S V, Raju M V L N and Chatterjee R N. 2021. Backyard poultry farming for sustained production and enhanced nutritional and livelihood security with special reference to India: A review. Tropical Animal Health and Production 53: 176.

Rath P K, Mishra P K, Mallick B K and Behura N C. 2015. Evaluation of different egg quality traits and interpretation of their mode of inheritance in White Leghorns. Veterinary World 8(4): 449–52.

Sapkota S, Kolakshyapati M R, Deckota N R, Gorkhali N and Bhatarai N. 2020. Evaluation of external and internal egg quality traits of indigenous Sakini chicken in different generations of selection. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 10(2): 41–48.

Sarma M, Islam R, Borah M K, Sharma P, Mahanta J D, Kalita N and Bhattacharyya BN. 2018. Comparative performance of Vanaraja, Srinidhi and Desi chicken under traditional system among tribal community of Assam. Indian Journal of Animal Research 52(10): 1518–520.

Sekeroglu A and Altuntas E. 2008. Effects of egg weight on egg quality characteristics. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 89: 379–83.

Sharma S, Singh G, Vij R, Sankhyan V and Dinesh K. 2021. Physical and biochemical characterization of eggs of chicken crossbreed and its comparison with Dahlem Red for rural poultry development. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research.

Singh B, Kumar S, Kuar N and Yadav S N. 2009. Evaluation of external and internal egg quality traits of hill fowl reared under backyard system. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 44: 25–29.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods, 8th edition. Affiliated East-West Press and Iowa State University Press.

Stadelman W J. 1977. Egg Science and Technology. 2nd ed. Westport: AVI Pub. Co. Inc.

Valavan S E, Omprakash A V and Bhartidhasan A. 2016. Production performance of Kadaknath in an organized poultry farm. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience 2: 125–28.

Yadav A K, Singh J and Yadav S K. 2017. Characteristic feature of indigenous poultry breeds of India: A review. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience 5(1): 884–92.

Yakubu A, Ogah D M and Barde R E. 2008. Productivity and egg quality characteristics of free range naked neck and normal feathered Nigerian Indigenous Chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science 7: 579–85.

Downloads

Submitted

2023-03-18

Published

2024-01-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DINESH, K. ., SANKHYAN, V. ., THAKUR, D. ., KATOCH, S. ., KUMAR, S. ., & BHARDWAJ, N. . (2024). Evaluation of Native and Kadaknath chicken for production performance, egg quality traits and farmers acceptability in Western Himalayan region of Himachal Pradesh, India. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 94(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v94.i1.134434
Citation