Nutritional evaluation of cowpea, mung bean and cluster bean fodders in Barbari male adult goats


250 / 364

Authors

  • PRABHAT TRIPATHI ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Science, Navi Bagh, Berasia road, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh image/svg+xml
  • M K TRIPATHI Krishi Bhawan, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi image/svg+xml
  • T K DUTTA ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Eastern Regional Station, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal
  • RAVINDRA KUMAR ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh 281 122 India image/svg+xml
  • SUSHIL K YADAV ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Eastern Regional Station, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal
  • U B CHAUDHARY ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh 281 122 India image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v94i11.135364

Keywords:

Cluster bean, Cowpea, Fodder, Goat, Mung bean, Nutritive value

Abstract

This study evaluated the nutritive value of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), mung bean (Vigna radiata) and cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) fodders in goats, fed during monsoon season in semi-arid tropics of India. Crops were grown as rain-fed on sandy loam soil fields and green biomass was harvested daily from flowering to pod formation stage. Barbari male (n=18) adult goats were divided into three equal groups with 5 animals in each and fed daily with one of the three crop fodders ad lib. followed by nutrient balance trial after 25 days of initiation feeding. Crude protein content of the three fodders varied from 12.90 to 18.80% during the experiment. Dry matter intake and digestibility of dry matter, acid detergent fibre and total carbohydrates were similar among three fodders; whereas, digestibility of organic matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fibre and hemicellulose were significantly different and found to be higher in cowpea fodder compared to other fodders. The total digestible nutrients (TDN) content was similar, but digestible crude protein (DCP) content was greater in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), followed by cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) and mung bean (Vigna radiata). Intake of TDN and DCP followed the trend of TDN and DCP content of the fodders. The nitrogen balance (g/kg W0.75) increased marginally in cowpea fodder fed goats than other treatments. Rumen fluid pH and ammonia nitrogen (mg/dl) were enhanced in cluster bean (6.8 and 30.5 mg) followed by cowpea and mung bean; whereas total-nitrogen, tricarboxylic acid precipitable nitrogen (TCA-ppt-N) and total volatile fatty acids (TVFA) were similar among three fodders. Blood haemato-biochemical attributes were not affected by the three fodders, except plasma urea concentration (mg/dl) which was greater in cowpea fed goats compared to other treatments. From this study, it was found that TDN (%), DCP (%) and ME (Mcal/kg feed DM) contents of tested fodders can form a baseline data for goat ration formulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abebe B K and Alemayehu M T. 2022. A review of the nutritional use of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) for human and animal diets. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 10: 100383.

Aboul-Naga A, Osman M A, Alary V, Hassan F, Daoud I and Tourrand J F. 2014. Raising goats as adaptation process to long drought incidence at the Coastal Zone of Western Desert in Egypt. Small Ruminant Research 121: 106–10.

Anele U Y, Sudekum K H, Hummel J, Arigbede O M, Oni A O, Olanite J A, Bottger C, Ojo V O and Jolaosho A O. 2011. Chemical characterization, in vitro dry matter and ruminal crude protein degradability and microbial protein synthesis of some cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) haulm varieties. Animal Feed Science and Technology 163: 161–69.

AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15thEdn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.

Aregheore A M. 2005. Effect of Yucca schidigera saponin on the nutritive value of urea-ammoniated maize stover and its feeding value when supplemented with forage legume (Calliandra calothyrsus) for goats. Small Ruminant Research 56: 95–102.

Ashraf M Y, Akhtar K, Sarwar G and Ashraf M. 2005. Role of rooting system in salt tolerance potential of different guar accessions. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 25: 243–49.

Barnett A J G and Reid R L. 1957. Studies on the production of volatile fatty acids from grass and rumen liquor in an artificial rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science 48: 315–21.

Boe A, Twidwell E K and Kephart K D. 1991. Growth and forage yield of cowpea and mungbean in the Northern Great Plains. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 71: 709–15.

Chakeredza S, terMeulen U and Ndlovu L R. 2002. Effect of cowpea hay, groundnut hay, cotton seed meal and maize meal supplementation to maize stover on intake, digestibility, microbial protein supply and acetate kinetics in weaner lambs. Tropical Animal Health and Production 34: 49–64.

Chaudhary U B, Tripathi M K, Gupta B, Dutta T K and Sirohi H V. 2013. Effect of inorganic and organic zinc and copper on performance, nutrient utilization, rumen fermentation and blood biochemistry of kids. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83: 1313–22.

Conway E J. 1962. Micro Diffusion analysis and Volumetric error. 5th Edn. Crossby Lockwood and Sons Ltd. London.

Das M M, Maity S B, and Kundu S S. 2005. Evaluation of massoor straw based ration in sheep and goat. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 22: 204–05.

Devendra C. 2013. Investments on pro-poor development projects on Goats: Ensuring success for improved livelihoods. Asian- Australasian Journal of Animal Science 26: 1–18.

Durge S M, Tripathi M K, Tripathi P, Narayan D., Rout P K and Chaudhary U B. 2014. Intake, nutrient utilization, rumen fermentation, microbial hydrolytic enzymes and hemato- biochemical attributes of lactating goats fed concentrates containing Brassica juncea oil meal. Small Ruminant Research 121: 300–07.

Dutta T K, Bandil K, Chatterjee A, Bhakat C, Mandal D K and Rai S. 2022. In-vitro and In-vivo evaluation of different leguminous straw-based rations on fermentation metabolites, growth and nutrient utilization in Barbari kids. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 22: 353–65.

El-Salam A, M S, El-Metwally I M, El-Ghany H M A and Hozayn M. 2013. Potentiality of using mungbean as a summer legume forage crop under Egyptian condition. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 9: 1238–43.

Fahmy A A, Youssef K M and El Shaer, H M. 2010. Intake and nutritive value of some salt-tolerant fodder grasses for sheep under saline conditions of South Sinai, Egypt. Small Ruminant Research 91: 110–15.

Francois L E, Donovan T J and Maas E V. 1990. Salinity effects on emergence, vegetative growth and seed yield of guar. Agronomy Journal 82: 587–92.

Garg B K and Burman U. 2002. Physiology, pp. 63-84. Guar in India. (Eds.) Kumar D and Singh N B. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur.

Garg D D, Arya R S, Sharma T and Dhuria R K. 2004. Effect of replacement of sewan straw by moong chara on rumen and haemato-biochemical parameters in sheep. Veterinary Practitioners 5: 70–73.

Hanafy M A, Fahmy A A, Farghaly M S, Afaf A and El Sheref. 2007. Effect of using some fodder plants in diets on goats’ performance under desert conditions of Sinai. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds 10: 151–63.

Hediat-Ullah H, Khalil I H, Lightfoot D A, Durr-E-Nayab and Imdadullah. 2012. Selecting mungbean genotypes for fodder production on the basis of degree of indeterminacy and biomass. Pakistan Journal of Botany 44: 697–703.

Ibidhi R, Bharanidharan R, Kim Jong-G, Hong Woo-H, Nam In-S, Baek Youl-C, Kim Tae-H and Kim Kyoung-H. 2021. Developing equations for converting digestible energy to metabolizable energy for Korean Hanwoo beef cattle. Animals 11: 1696.

Kanani J, Lukefahr S D and Stanko R L. 2006. Evaluation of tropical forage legumes (Medicago sativa, Dolichos lablab, Leucaena leucocephala and Desmanthus bicornutus) for growing goats. Small Ruminant Research 65: 1–7.

Kearl I C. 1982. Nutrient Requirements of Ruminants in Developing Countries. Utah Agric. Exp. Sept. Utah State University, Logan, USA.

Lee J H, Kouakou B and Kannan G. 2008. Chemical composition and quality characteristics of chevon from goats fed three different post-weaning diets. Small Ruminant Research 75: 177–84.

McDonald P, Henderson A R and Heron S J E. 1991. The Biochemistry of Silage, 2nd ed. Kent, Kingston.

Mertens R R. 1994. Regulation of forage intake, pp. 450-493. Forage Quality, Evaluation and Utilization. (Ed.) Fahey G C. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.

Mahore J and Mahanta S K. 2013. Certain haematological and biochemical parameters in local Bundelkhandi Goats. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 19: 36–39.

Mohamed E A, El-Kholany M E, Sadek W M A and A. Desoky L I. 2020. Impact of feeding guar plant as silage or hay for Zaraibi does in two reproductive stages on newborn performance and some blood and metabolic parameters. Egyptian Journal of Applied Science 35: 13–27.

NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle: Seventh Revised Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9825.

NRC. 2007. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. http://doi. org/10.17226/11654.

Obatolu V A. 2003. Growth pattern of infants fed with a mixture of extruded malted maize and cowpea. Nutrition 19: 174–78.

Pachauri V C and Upadhyaya, R S. 1986. Nutritive value of clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) hay as affected by supplementation of oat grain in goats. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 56: 154–55.

Pailan G H and Singhal K K. 2007. Effect of dietary glucosinolate on nutrient utilization, milk yield and blood constituent of lactating goats. Small Ruminant Research 71: 31–37.

Prakash B, Dutta T K and Siddiqui I A. 2006. Effect of plane of nutrition on nutrient utilization and performance of Barbari kids. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 23: 29–33.

Radostits O M, Gay C C, Blood D C and Hinchcliff K W. 2000. Veterinary Medicine, 9th edn. W. B. Saunders, London, pp. 1819-1822.

Richardson J M, Wilkison R G and Sinclair L A. 2003. Synchrony of nutrient supply to the rumen and dietary energy sources and their effects on the growth of lambs. Journal of Animal Science 81: 1332–47.

Robertson J B and Van Soest P J. 1981. The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

Sahoo B and Walli T K. 2008. Effect of feeding un-degradable protein with energy on nutrient utilization, milk yield and milk composition of crossbred goats. Small Ruminant Research 75: 36–42.

Salama H S A and Nawar A I. 2016. Studying the nutritive profile of guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.) harvested at different ages and its potential as a summer forage legume in Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy 38: 559–68.

Satter L D and Slyter L L. 1974. Effects of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in-vitro. British Journal of Nutrition 32: 199–210.

Singh D N, Bohra J, Tyagi S, Singh T, Banjara T R and Gupta G. 2022. A review of India’s fodder production status and opportunities. Grass and Forage Science 77: 1–10.

Singh N, Arya R S, Sharma T, Dhuria R K and Garg D D. 2008. Effect of feeding of cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) straw based complete feed in loose and compressed form on rumen and haemato-biochemical parameters in Marwari sheep. Veterinary Practitioners 9: 110–15.

Singh S, Nag S K, Kundu S S and Maity S B. 2010. Relative intake, eating pattern, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, fermentation pattern and growth performance of lambs fed organically and inorganically produced cowpea hay-barley grain diets. Tropical Grassland 44: 55–61.

Singh K, Ram H, Kumar R, Meena R K, Kumar R and Manisha. 2021. Fodder quality and yields of mung bean as influenced by different weed management practices. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 38: 233–39.

Sow F, Niang K, Camara Y, Traoré El H, Moula N, Cabaraux J F, Missohou A and Hornick Jean-L. 2020. Comparative study of intake, apparent digestibility and energy and nitrogen uses in Sahelian and Majorera dairy goats fed hay of Vigna unguiculata. Animals 10: 861.

Snedecor G W and Cochron W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH publishing company, New Delhi.

Speijers M H M, Fraser M D, Theobald V J and Haresign W. 2005. Effect of ensiled forage legumes on performance of store finishing lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 120: 203–16.

Stewart C S. 1977. Factors affecting the cellulolytic activity of rumen contents. Applied Environmental Microbiology 33: 497–502.

Tagari H, Dror Y, Ascarelli I and Bondi A. 1964. The influence of levels of protein and starch in the ration of sheep on the utilization of protein. British Journal of Nutrition 18: 333–45.

Tripathi M K, Chaturvedi O H, Karim S A, Singh V K and Sisodiya S L. 2007. Effect of different levels of concentrate allowances on rumen fluid pH, nutrient digestion, nitrogen retention and growth performance of weaner lambs. Small Ruminant Research 72: 178–86.

Tripathi P, Dutta T K, Tripathi M K, Chaudahry U B and Kumar R. 2014. Preparation of complete feed pellet from monsoon herbages (Cenchrus ciliaris, Dactylotennium aegypticum and Tephorosia purpurea) and its utilization in kids. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 20: 31–36.

Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Symposium: Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–97.

Xue Z, Liu N, Wang Y, Yang H, Wei Y, Moriel P, Palmer E and Zhang Y. 2020. Combining orchard grass and alfalfa: Effects of forage ratios on in vitro rumen degradation and fermentation characteristics of silage compared with hay. Animals 10: 59–75.

Downloads

Submitted

2023-04-13

Published

2024-11-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

TRIPATHI, P. ., TRIPATHI, M. K. ., DUTTA, T. K. ., KUMAR, R. ., YADAV, S. K. ., & CHAUDHARY, U. B. . (2024). Nutritional evaluation of cowpea, mung bean and cluster bean fodders in Barbari male adult goats. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 94(11), 987–994. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v94i11.135364
Citation