Effect of the feeding condition and number of dominant follicles on oestrus synchronization in Swamp buffalo

VAN HANH  NGUYEN; SON HA  TRAN; KIM DANG  PHAM; XUAN HUU  QUAN; MINH TUAN  VU

doi:10.56093/ijans.v94i4.136008

Authors

VAN HANH NGUYEN Institute of Biotechnology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Cau Giay, Ha Noi, Vietnam
SON HA TRAN National Institute of Animal Science, Bac Tu Liem, Hanoi, Vietnam
KIM DANG PHAM Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Tay Ho, Hanoi, Vietnam
XUAN HUU QUAN National Institute of Animal Science, Bac Tu Liem, Hanoi, Vietnam
MINH TUAN VU National Institute of Animal Science, Bac Tu Liem, Hanoi, Vietnam

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v94i4.136008

Keywords:

Breeding condition, Dominant follicles, Oestrus synchronization, Swamp buffaloes

Abstract

The research aimed to assess how feeding conditions and the number of the dominant follicles (DF) influence oestrus synchronization in swamp buffaloes. A total of 170 swamp female buffaloes raised in semi-grazing and housekeeping were included in the study. The synchronization used CIDR method and the follicles on the day of CIDR (Controlled Internal Drug Releasing) insert and removal were tracked by sonography. The results indicated that the age of first mating, age at first calving, and caving interval showed no significant differences in the two feeding conditions. The number of follicles at CIDR insertion and removal decreased in semi-grazing, but increased in housekeeping buffaloes. The percentage of buffalo without DF, one DF, and two DFs at CIDR withdrawal did not differ statistically. The percentage of estrus was 100% in both groups. Pregnancy rates were 53.18% in semi- grazing and 52.63% in housekeeping. The onset of oestrus was similar, but the duration of oestrus was longer in the buffaloes without DF than those with one or two DFs. The percentage of pregnant buffaloes in the group without DF was significantly lower than that in the other two groups. In summary, the efficiency of oestrus synchronization did not differ between semi-grazing and housekeeping methods. Buffaloes without DF displayed longer oestrus periods and lower pregnancy rates compared to those with one or two DFs in the ovarian system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baruselli P C, Soares J G, Bayeux B M, Silva J C, Mingoti R and Carvalho N. 2018. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in water buffaloes. Animal Reproduction 15: 971–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0043

Bharti P K, Biswal P, Kamal R, Devi B and Dutt T. 2022. Effect of weaning on performance of dairy buffaloes in tropical conditions-A review. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 92(11): 1257–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i11.100971

Campanile G, Vecchio D, Neglia G, Dipalo R, Prandi A and D’Occhio M J. 2008. Progesterone and pregnancy status of buffaloes treated with a GnRH agonist. Livestock Science 115: 242–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.08.001

Chaikhun T, Tharasanit T, Rattanatep J, De Rensis F and Techakumphu M. 2010. Fertility of swamp buffalo following the synchronization of ovulation by the sequential administration of GnRH and PGF2alpha combined with fixed- timed artificial insemination. Theriogenology 74(8): 1371–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.06.007

Ciptadi G, Budiarto A, Hakim L, Putri A I, Finawati P and Ubaidillah M H. 2019. The reproductive characteristics of swamp buffalo in smallholder farm in East Java, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environmental Science 247: 012019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/247/1/012019

Dahiya S P, Kumar M and Dhillod S. 2020. Relationship of linear type traits with production and reproduction performance in Murrah buffaloes. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 90(6): 942–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i6.105011

De Araujo Berber R C, Madureira E H and Baruselli P S. 2002. Comparison of two Ovsynch protocols (GnRH versus LH) for fixed timed insemination in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Theriogenology 57: 1421–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00639-8

Dhaka A P, Phogat J B, Singh S, Pandey A K, Sharma K and Ghadwal S. 2019. Efficacy of modified co-synch plus protocol with or without progesterone device for estrus induction and conception rate in murrah buffaloes under field conditions during summer season. Buffalo Bulletin 38(2): 353–61.

Dhami A J, Nakrani B B, Hadiya K K, Patel J A and Shah R G. 2015. Comparative efficacy of different estrus synchronization protocols on estrus induction response, fertility and plasma progesterone and biochemical profile in crossbred anestrus cows. Veterinary World 8(11): 1310–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.1310-1316

Gautam G, Gyawali R R, Nath B and Pant S. 2017. Characterization and treatment of infertility in buffaloes of hills and Terai regions of mid Nepal. Proceedings of the International Buffalo Symposium. pp. 98-102. Nepal.

Harun-or-Rashid M, Phulia S, Hasan M M I, Bhuiyan M M U, Juyena N S and Sharma R K. 2020. Monitoring the sonographic ovarian dynamics and pregnancy rate in cyclic Murrah buffalo cows synchronized with prostaglandin F2α. Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 35(1): 50–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.1.50

Hussein H A, Mohamed R H, Hossam M and Wehrend A. 2016. Ovarian response and conception rate following oestrus synchronization using three protocols in Egyptian buffalo heifers. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere 44(5): 287–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15653/TPG-160214

Kavya K M, Sharma R K, Jerome A, Phulia S K and Singh I. 2020. Relationship between anti-müllerian hormone, antral follicular population and resumption of cyclicity in postpartum buffaloes. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 90(7): 998–01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i7.106669

Mani S, Subramaniyan P and Mahakrishnan P. 2021. Effect of preovulatory follicle volume and serum oestradiol concentration on conception rate in postpartum Murrah buffaloes. Buffalo Bulletin 40(2): 369–72.

Minervino A H H, Zava M, Vecchio D and Borghese A. 2020. Bubalus bubalis: A short story. front. Veterinary Sciences 7: 570413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.570413

Noseir W M B, El-Bawab I E, Hassan W R and Fadel M S. 2014. Ovarian follicular dynamics in buffaloes during different estrus synchronization protocols. Veterinary Science Development 4(1): 5315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/vsd.2014.5315

Pineda P S, Flores E B, Herrera J R V and Low W Y. 2021. Opportunities and challenges for improving the productivity of swamp buffaloes in Southeastern Asia. Frontiers in Genetics 12: 629861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.629861

Samir H, Kandiel M M M, El-Maaty A M A, Sediqyar M, Sasaki K and Watanabe G. 2019. Ovarian follicular changes and hemodynamics in Egyptian buffaloes under CIDR-PGF2α and Ovsynch-CIDR estrus synchronization treatments. Journal of Reproduction and Development 65(5): 451–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2019-035

Van Hanh N, Hoang Nghia S, De Sousa N M, Barbato O and Beckers J F. 2020. Validation of Buffalo PAG Antisera for Early Pregnancy Diagnosis in Bovine. Indian Journal of Animal Research: B-1135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.B-1135

Visha P, Jayachandran S, Selvaraj P, Nanjappan K, Satheesh Kumar S and Palanisammi A. 2014. Follicular growth pattern in buffaloes synchronized to estrus with progesterone impregnated intravaginal sponges. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 3(3): 960–65.

Widi T S M, Pratowo S, Sulaiman A, Hulfa R and Sumantri I. 2021. Reproductive characteristics of female swamp buffalo reared under Kalang production system in South Kalimantan. The 1st International Conference on Livestock in Tropical Environment (ICLiTE-1). Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 902: 012041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/902/1/012041