Development of novel egg type chicken variety with improved productivity for rural backyards of India
616 / 704
Keywords:
Egg quality, Heterosis, Layer cross, Rural poultry, Three-way crossAbstract
Rural poultry farming with improved high producing chicken varieties is transforming the rural livelihoods. The present study was aimed at developing a high egg producing variety suitable for backyard poultry farming. A total of 602 female birds representing five crossbreds, i.e. Kadaknath × IWH (KH), PD-3 × IWH (DH), PD-2 × IWH (VH), PD-1 × IWH (CH) and PD-3 × KH (DKH) were evaluated for their performance up to 72 weeks under farm conditions. The traits evaluated were body weights at 8, 16, 20, 40, 52, 64 and 72 weeks age at sexual maturity (ASM), egg production and egg weight at 40, 52, 64 and 72 weeks and egg quality traits. Analysis of variance was used to assess the effect of genotypes on different traits and heterosis was estimated to check the superiority of the crosses over the parent lines. Genotype had significant influence on all the traits. Morphologically, only DKH crossbred had multi-coloured plumage, while all other crosses had white plumage with brown patches. DKH cross produced about 239.2±2.96 eggs annually and also witnessed the highest heterotic gains for all the body weight traits. Also, heterosis for ASM was very low for DKH cross and hence, in desired direction. Based on present findings, the three-way DKH cross owing to its multi-coloured plumage and good performance can be further studied for its potential as a high-producing layer variety in rural backyards.
Downloads
References
Akbas Y and Takma C H. 2005. Canonical correlation analysis for studying the relationship between egg production traits and body weight, egg weight and age at sexual maturity in layers. Czech Journal of Animal Science 50:163–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/4010-CJAS
Chandan P, Prince L L L, Bhattacharya T K, Rajkumar U and Chatterjee R N. 2019. Estimation of heritability and genetic correlation of egg production traits using animal model in commercial layer. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 89: 1269–273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i11.95888
Dalal D S, Ratwan P and Yadav A S. 2022. Genetic evaluation of growth, production and reproduction traits in Aseel and Kadaknath chickens in agroclimatic conditions of northern India. Biological Rhythm Research 53: 40–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2019.1621081
Debnath B C and Ghosh T K. 2015. Phenotypic correlations between some external and internal egg quality traits in Gramapriya layers. Exploratory Animal and Medical Research 5: 78–85.
Dinesh K, Sankhyan V, Thakur D, Verma N and Bhardwaj N. 2022. Effect of age on egg quality traits of Dahlem Red chicken under intensive system of management in Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 92: 347–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i3.122268
Dunn I. 2011. Poultry breeding for egg quality: Traditional and modern genetic approaches. Improving the Safety and Quality of Eggs and Egg Products: Egg chemistry, production and consumption 245–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857093912.3.245
Falconer D S and Mackay T F C. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Scientific and Technical, Longman Group UK Limited.
Felsenstein J. 1965. The effect of linkage on directional selection. Genetics 52: 349–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/52.2.349
Haunshi S and Prince L L L. 2021. Kadaknath: A popular native chicken breed of India with unique black colour characteristics. World’s Poultry Science Journal 77: 427–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2021.1897918
Haunshi S and Rajkumar U. 2020. Native chicken production in India: present status and challenges. Livestock Research for Rural Development 32.
Haunshi S, Doley S and Kadirvel G. 2010. Comparative studies on egg, meat, and semen qualities of native and improved chicken varieties developed for backyard poultry production. Tropical Animal Health and Production 42: 1013–019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9524-3
Haunshi S, Doley S and Shakuntala I. 2009. Production performance of indigenous chicken of northeastern region and improved varieties developed for backyard farming. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 79: 901–05.
Haunshi S, Padhi M K, Niranjan M, Rajkumar U, Shanmugam M and Chatterjee R N. 2013. Comparative evaluation of native breeds of chicken for persistency of egg production, egg quality and biochemical traits. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83: 59–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v83i1.26442
Haunshi S, Shanmugam M, Padhi M K, Niranjan M, Rajkumar U, Reddy M R and Panda A K. 2012. Evaluation of two Indian native chicken breeds for reproduction traits and heritability of juvenile growth traits. Tropical Animal Health and Production 44: 969–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9994-y
Khalil M, Hassan H A, El-Gendi G and EL Nagar A G 2023. Heterotic components for age at first egg, egg production, some partial egg records, clutch sizes and pause duration in crossing four Egyptian strains of chickens. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal 43(1):109–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/epsj.2023.291763
Kumar M, Dahiya S P, Ratwan P, Sheoran N, Kumar S and Kumar N. 2022. Assessment of egg quality and biochemical parameters of Aseel and Kadaknath indigenous chicken breeds of India under backyard poultry farming. Poultry Science 101: 101589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101589
Lacin E, Yildiz A, Esenbuga N and Macit M. 2008. Effects of differences in the initial body weight of groups on laying performance and egg quality parameters of Lohmann laying hens. Czech Journal of Animal Science 53: 466–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/341-CJAS
Muir W I, Akter Y, Bruerton K and Groves P J. 2022. The influence of hen size and diet nutrient density in early lay on hen performance, egg quality, and hen health in late lay. Poultry Science 101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102041
Nagarajan S, Narahari D, Jayaprasad I A and Thyagarajan D. 1991. Influence of stocking density and layer age on production traits and egg quality in Japanese quail. British Poultry Science 32: 243–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669108417347
Niranjan M, Sharma R P, Rajkumar U, Chatterjee R N, Reddy B L N and Bhattacharya T K. 2008. Egg quality traits in chicken varieties developed for backyard poultry farming in India. Livestock Research for Rural Development 20.
Padhi M K, Chatterjee R N, Rajkumar U, Bhattacharya T K and Bhanja S K. 2015. Genetic and phenotypic parameters estimates for body weight, conformation, production and reproduction traits of PD1 (Vanaraja male line) during different periods. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 85: 883–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i8.50975
Padhi M K, Chatterjee R N and Rajkumar U. 2022. Effect of age on egg quality in chicken. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 57: 133–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8180.2022.00031.9
Padhi M K, Chatterjee R N, Haunshi S and Rajkumar U. 2013. Effect of age on egg quality in chicken. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 48: 122–25.
Parmar S N, Thakur M S, Tomar S S and Pillai P V A. 2006. Evaluation of egg quality traits in indigenous Kadaknath breed of poultry. Livestock Research for Rural Development 18.
Rajkumar U, Prince L L L, Haunshi S, Jayakumar S, Rajaravindra K S, Niranjan M, Reddy B L N and Chatterjee R N. 2023. Does selection index application for highly heritable traits need revisiting – A comprehensive study with bodyweight and shank length in Vanaraja male line chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 93(10): 1021–025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v93i10.135284
Rajkumar U, Prince L L L, Paswan C, Haunshi S and Chatterjee R N. 2021b. Variance component analysis of growth and production traits in Vanaraja male line chickens using animal model. Animal Bioscience 34: 471–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0826
Rajkumar U, Prince LL L, Rajaravindra K S, Haunshi S, Niranjan M and Chatterjee R N. 2021d. Analysis of (co) variance components and estimation of breeding value of growth and production traits in Dahlem Red chicken using pedigree relationship in an animal model. PLoS One 16: e0247779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247779
Rajkumar U and Rama Rao S V. 2015. Gramapriya, a prolific brown egg layer for rural backyards. Indian Farming 65: 32–34.
Rajkumar U, Haunshi S, Paswan C, Raju M V L N, Rao S R and Chatterjee R N. 2017. Characterization of indigenous Aseel chicken breed for morphological, growth, production, and meat composition traits from India. Poultry Science 96: 2120–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew492
Rajkumar U, Niranjan M, Prince L L L, Haunshi S, Paswan C and Reddy B L N. 2021c. Short term selection response for higher 52 week egg mass based on Osborn index in Vanaraja female parent line chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 91: 41–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v91i1.113272
Rajkumar U, Niranjan M, Prince L L L, Paswan C, Haunshi S and Reddy B L N. 2020a. Genetic evaluation of growth and production performance and short term selection response for egg mass in Gramapriya female line chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 90: 401–06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i3.102520
Rajkumar U, Padhi M K, Haunshi S and Chatterjee R N. 2016. Genetic and phenotypic response in Vanaraja male line chicken under short term selection experiment. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 86: 1287–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i11.63320
Rajkumar U, Prince L L L, Haunshi S, Paswan C and Reddy B L N. 2020b. Evaluation of Vanaraja female line chicken for growth, production, carcass and egg quality traits. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 90: 603–09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i4.104212
Rajkumar U, Raju M V L N, Niranjan M, Haunshi S, Padhi M K and Rao S R. 2014. Evaluation of egg quality traits in native Aseel chicken. Indian Journal of Poultry Sciences 49: 324–27.
Rajkumar U, Rama Rao S V and Sharma R P. 2010. Backyard poultry farming: Changing the face of rural India. Indian Farming 59: 20–23.
Rajkumar U, Rama Rao S V, Raju M V L N and Chatterjee R N. 2021a. Backyard poultry farming for sustained production and enhanced nutritional and livelihood security with special reference to India: A review. Tropical Animal Health and Production 53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02621-6
Rajkumar U, Sharma R P, Padhi M K, Rajaravindra K S, Reddy B L N, Niranjan M and Chatterjee R N. 2011. Genetic analysis of juvenile growth and carcass traits in a full diallel mating in selected colored broiler lines. Tropical Animal Health and Production 43: 1129–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9812-6
Rajkumar U, Sharma R P, Rajaravindra K S, Niranjan M, Reddy B L N, Bhattacharya T K and Chatterjee R N. 2009. Effect of genotype and age on egg quality traits in naked neck chicken under tropical climate from India. International Journal of Poultry Science 8: 1151–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.1151.1155
Roland D A, Sloan D R and Harms R H. 1975. The ability of hens to maintain calcium deposition in the egg shell and egg yolk as the hen ages. Poultry Science 54: 1720–723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0541720
Sankhyan V and Thakur Y P. 2016. Comparative performance of Vanaraja and indigenous chicken under intensive system in subtemperate climatic condition of North Western Himalayan state of Himachal Pradesh. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology 5: 449–53.
Singh M, Mollier R T, Paton R N, Pongener N, Yadav R, Singh V, Katiyar R, Kumar R, Sonia C, Bhatt M, Babu S, Rajkhowa D J and Mishra V K. 2022. Backyard poultry farming with improved germplasm: Sustainable food production and nutritional security in fragile ecosystem. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 6: 393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.962268
Singh M, Singh U and Gurung B S. 2000. Evaluation of egg weight and its various measurements attributes in indigenous Aseel breed of chicken. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 35: 312–14.
Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical methods, 8th Edition, Iowa State University Press, Ames.
Sreenivas D, Prakash M G, Mahender M and Chatterjee R N. 2013. Genetic analysis of egg quality traits in White leghorn chicken. Veterinary World 6: 263–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2013.263-266
Vispute M M, Saxena V K, Narayan R, Tomar S, Rokade J J. and Verma M R. 2022. Evaluation of crossbreeding parameters for immunocompetence and serum enzyme profile in a partial diallel cross involving three genetic groups of chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Research 56(9): 1063–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/IJAR.B-4322
Whitehead C C, Bowman A S and Griffin H D. 2007. The effects of dietary fat and bird age on the weights of eggs and egg components in the laying hen. British Poultry Science 32: 565–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669108417381
Yahaya H K, Ibrahim H and Abdulsalam S. 2012. Correlation between body weight and body conformation of two broiler strains under the same dietary treatment. International Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 4: 181–83.
Yakubu A, Ogah D M and Barde R E. 2008. Productivity and egg quality characteristics of free range naked neck and normal feathered Nigerian indigenous chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science 7: 579–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.579.585
Zhang L C, Ning Z H, Xu G Y, Hou Z C and Yang N. 2005. Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in brown-egg dwarf layers. Poultry Science 84: 1209–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.8.1209
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.