Genetic analysis for reproductive and longevity traits in Landlly sows
288 / 316 / 47
Keywords:
Bayesian, Genetic parameter, Linear model, Longevity, Non-genetics factors, Threshold modelsAbstract
The rate of reproduction and lifetime productivity of the animals determine the success of a herd. As these features significantly impact sow productivity, welfare, and profitability, there is considerable interest in global swine breeding programmes to genetically select better sows for these attributes. In this scenario, reliable heritability estimates and genetic correlations between traits are essential for the success of genetic selection for such traits. The goals of the current study were to examine the reproductive and longevity traits and to estimate the genetic and phenotypic parameters for these traits in Landlly sows kept at a swine production farm, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India. The effect of non-genetic factors on different reproductive traits was estimated using SPSS version 16.0 and Bayesian approach which were utilized to estimate the genetic parameters for reproductive and longevity traits. The current study’s finding that the year and season of birth significantly affect reproductive traits generally suggests that there is potential for boosting productivity by optimising managemental practices. The heritability estimates were low for the reproductive and longevity traits, indicating a very little additive genetic variance in these traits, and individual selection will not be helpful for improving them. As some traits, such as LSB_FF & LSW_FF and LSB _SF & LSW_SF, have a moderate genetic correlation, indirect selection can be used to improve these two pairs of features.
Downloads
References
Alam M, Chang H K, Lee S S and Choi T J. 2021. Genetic analysis of major production and reproduction traits of Korean Duroc, Landrace and Yorkshire pigs. Animals 11(5): 1321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051321
Das D, Deka D, Nath D R and Goswami R N. 2005. Estimates of heritability and effects of some non-genetic factors on traits of reproduction in Hampshire pig. Indian Veterinary Journal 82: 847–50.
Engblom L, Calderón Díaz J A, Nikkilä M, Gray K, Harms P, Fix J and Stalder K. 2015. Genetic analysis of sow longevity and sow lifetime reproductive traits using censored data. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 133(2): 138–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12177
Engblom L, Lundeheim N, Dalin A M and Andersson K. 2007. Sow removal in Swedish commercial herds. Livestock Science 106: 76–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.07.002
Gorjanc G, Henderson D A, Kinghorn B, and Percy A. 2021. GeneticsPed: Pedigree and genetic relationship functions. R package version 1.54.0, http://rgenetics.org.
Guo X, Su G, Christensen O F, Janss L and Lund M S. 2016. Genome-wide association analyses using a Bayesian approach for litter size and piglet mortality in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs. BMC Genomics 17: 468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2806-z
Hadfield J D. 2010. MCMC methods for Multi-response generalized linear mixed models: The MCMCglmm R package. Journal of Statistical Software 33(2): 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i02
Haley C S, Avalos E and Smith C. 1988. Selection for litter size in the pig. Animal Breeding Abstracts 56: 317–32.
Hanenberg E H A T, Knol E F and Merks J W M. 2001. Estimates of genetic parameters for reproductive traits at different parities in Dutch Landrace pigs. Livestock Production Science 69: 179–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00258-X
Hoeschele I and Tier B. 1995. Estimation of variance components of threshold characters by marginal posterior modes and means via Gibbs sampling. Genetics, Selection, Evolution: GSE 27(6): 519–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:19950604
Kaufmann D, Hofer A, Bidanel J P and Kunzi N. 2000. Genetic parameters for individual birth and weaning weight and for litter size of Large White pigs. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 117(3): 121–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2000.00238.x
Knauer M, Stalder K. J, Serenius T, Baas T J, Berger P J, Karriker L, Goodwin R N, Johnson R K, Mabry J W, Miller R K, Robison O W and Tokach M D. 2010. Factors associated with sow stayability in 6 genotypes1. Journal of Animal Science 88(11): 3486–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2319
Kumari B P and Rao D S. 2010. Effect of non-genetic factors on the reproductive traits in crossbred pigs. Tamil Nadu Journal of Veterinary Animal Science 6: 1–4.
Luo M F, Boettcher P J, Schaeffer L R and Dekkers J C M. 2001. Bayesian inference for categorical traits with an application to variance component estimation. Journal of Dairy Science 8: 694–704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74524-9
Merilä J and Sheldon B. C. 1999. Genetic architecture of fitness and non-fitness traits: Empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity (Edinb) 83(Pt 2): 103–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6885850
Merks J W M and Molendijk R J F. 1995. Genetic correlations between production traits and first parity traits. Proceedings of 46th Annual Meeting, European Association for Animal Production. Commission on Pig Production, Prague, Czech Republic. Abstract 4.1
Naha B C, Gaur G K, Saini B L, Sahoo N R and Boro P. 2020. Genetic and phenotypic trend for growth performance in Landlly pigs. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 90: 296–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i2.98829
Neopane S P. 2014. Genetic and non-genetic factors affecting reproductive traits of Pakhribas pig in Nepal. Nepal Agricultural Research Journal 8: 77–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/narj.v8i0.11584
Ogawa S, Yazaki N, Ohnishi C, Ishii K, Uemoto Y and Satoh M. 2021. Maternal effect on body measurement and meat production traits in purebred Duroc pigs. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 138: 237–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12505
Pandu Ranga, P P R R, Reddy M G P, Prakash M G, Kumari B P, Sur J and Bharathi A. 2013. Genetic analysis of reproductive performance in crossbred pigs. Indian Journal of Animal Research 47(3): 226–30.
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.https://www.R-project.org/.
Serenius T and Stalder K J. 2004. Genetics of length of productive life and lifetime prolificacy in the Finish Landrace and Large White pig populations. Journal of Animal Science 82: 3111–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.82113111x
Sobczyńska M, Blicharski T and Tyra M. 2013. Relationships between longevity, lifetime productivity, carcass traits and conformation in Polish maternal pig breeds. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 130(5): 361–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12024
Suwanasopee T, Mabry J, Koonawootrittriron S, Sopannarath P and Tumwasorn S. 2005. Estimated genetic parameters of non-productive sow days related to litter size in swine raised in Thailand. Thai Journal of Agriculture Science 38.
Tomar S S. Textbook of Animal Breeding. New Delhi, India: Kalyani Publisher; 2004. pp. 90–94.
Uzzaman M. R, Park J E, Lee K T, Cho E S, Choi B H and Kim T H. 2018. A genome-wide association study of reproductive traits in a Yorkshire pig population. Livestock Science 209: 67–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.01.005
Zhang Z, Zhang H, Pan R Y, Wu L, Li Y L, Chen Z M, Cai G Y, Li J Q and Wu Z F. 2016. Genetic parameters and trends for production and reproduction traits of a Landrace herd in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 15(5): 1069–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61105-4
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.