Farmer participatory assessment of nutritional interventions for productivity and profitability enhancement of dairy animals at small farms


203 / 165

Authors

  • SEEMA YADAV ICAR-ATARI, Zone-III, Kanpur
  • S K DUBEY ICAR-ATARI, Zone-III, Kanpur
  • S K SINGH ICAR-ATARI, Zone-III, Kanpur
  • RAGHWENDRA SINGH ICAR-ATARI, Zone-III, Kanpur
  • S N YEMUL ICAR-ATARI, Zone-III, Kanpur
  • MANVENDRA SINGH Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK), Banda
  • SATISH KUMAR SINGH KVK, Gorakhpur-I, U.P
  • ASHISH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA KVK Kaushambi, U.P.
  • SUNIL SINGH KVK Unnao, U.P.

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v95i3.149438

Keywords:

Bypass nutrients, Mineral mixture,On farm testings (OFTs), Productivity enhancement, Rumen modifiers

Abstract

The present study was conducted across 18 districts falling under eight Agro-climatic zones in Uttar Pradesh functioning under aegis of ICAR-ATARI, Kanpur with the aim of assessment of nutritional interventions for productivity enhancement of dairy animals in the selected villages. Through Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) and Problem-Cause analysis (PCA) in the selected villages, issues of lower level of milk production and sub-optimal fertility potential were figured out to be topmost problems among the dairy animals of the selected area. The potential causes of the poor performance of dairy animals identified were lack of energy and micronutrients in the feed, suboptimal rumen health, imbalanced ration and feeding of poor-quality roughages. To overcome the prevailing problems of small and marginal dairy farmers, the innovative technologies related to nutritional intervention (bypass nutrients, rumen modifiers, mineral mixture etc.) for dairy animals, released from different ICAR institutes and state agricultural universities were subjected for On Farm Testings (OFTs) for assessing their field level appropriateness. The results of different OFTs conducted, confirmed significantly higher milk production, improved fertility, higher benefit:cost ratio in treatment groups with improved technologies over control groups with farmer’s practice of feeding and positive reactions of the farmers for adoption of those technologies. The present study concluded that adoption of these tested technologies like daily feeding of mineral mixture, bypass nutrients, probiotics etc. may improve the productivity of dairy animals under the field conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahirwar M K and Leela V. 2012. Nutritive value and in vitro degradability of Azolla pinnata for ruminants. Indian Veterinary Journal 89(4): 101-2.

Alam M G S, UI-Azam M S and Khan M J. 2006. Supplementation with urea and molasses and body weight, milk yield and onset of ovarian cyclicity in cows. Journal of Reproduction and Development 52: 529–35.

Alexandratos N and Bruinsma J. 2012. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision.

Ayad M A, Benallou B, Saim M S, Smadi M A and Meziane T. 2013. Impact of feeding yeast culture on milk yield, milk components, and blood components in Algerian dairy herds. Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology 4(2): 1-5.

Balehegn M, Duncan A, Tolera A, Ayantunde A A, Issa S, Karimou M and Adesogan A T. 2020. Improving adoption of technologies and interventions for increasing supply of quality livestock feed in low-and middle-income countries. Global food security 26: 100372.

Basic animal husbandry statistics. 2022.

Brito L F, Oliveira H R, Houlahan K, Fonseca P A, Lam S, Butty A M and Schenkel F S. 2020. Genetic mechanisms underlying feed utilization and implementation of genomic selection for improved feed efficiency in dairy cattle. Canadian journal of animal science 100(4): 587-604.

Castaneda-Gutierrez E, Overton T R, Butler W R, Bauman D E. 2005. Dietary supplements of two doses of calcium salts of conjugated linoleic acid during the transition period and early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 88:1078- 89.

Davison T M, Vervoort F P, Duncalfe F. 1991. Responses to along chain fatty acid supplement fed to dairy cows at two stages of lactation. Animal Production Science 31(4): 467-70.

El-garhi M S, Soltan M A, Ahmed H A, Mervat A L, Galal M and El-bordeny N E. 2019. Assessment impact of using locally produced probiotic bacteria on the productive and reproductive performance of Holstein dairy cows. Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal 65(162): 39-50.

Gowda N K S, Maneyer A, Verma S, Valleesha N C, Maya G, Pal D T and Suresh K P. 2015. Azolla (Azolla pinnata) as a green feed supplement for dairy cattle - An on-farm study. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 15(2): 283-7.

Gupta D C, Suresh A and Mann J S. 2008. Management practices and productivity status of cattle and buffaloes in Rajasthan. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 78(7): 769-74.

Gupta R, Singh K, Sharma M and Kumar M. 2017. Effect of mineral mixture feeding on the productive and reproductive performance of crossbred cattle. International Journal of Livestock Research 7(12): 231-6.

Khadda B S, Lata K, Kumar R, Jadav J S and Rai A K. 2014. Effect of urea molasses minerals block on nutrient utilization, milk production and reproductive performance of crossbred cattle under semi-arid ecosystem. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 84(3): 302-5.

Kumar M R, Tiwari D P and Kumar A. 2005. Effect of undegradable dietary protein level and plane of nutrition on lactation performance in crossbred cattle. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 18(10):1407-13.

Landes M, Cessna J, Kuberka L and Jones K. 2017. India’s dairy sector: Structure, performance, and prospects. Washington, DC, USA: United States Department of Agriculture.

Lavania P, Jingar S C, Bugalia H L, Meena S M and Kumar A. 2019. Effect of Azolla feeding as a supplement on milk and reproduction performance on zebu cattle under field condition. International Journal of Chemical Studies 7(3): 3167-8.

Makkar H. 2016. Animal nutrition: beyond Boundaries of Feed and Feeding. Broadening Horizons (Feedipedia.org) July 2016: 1-5

Mudgal V, Jaiswal P, Abraham G, Kaushik K and Dahiya S S. 2022. Aquatic fern Azolla affecting milk production in buffaloes. Buffalo Bulletin 41(4): 579-89.

Owen E, Smith T, Makkar H. 2012. Successes and failures with animal nutrition practices and technologies in developing countries: a synthesis of an FAO e-conference. Animal Feed Science Technology 174: 211–26.

Parnerkar S, Kumar D, Shankhpal S S and Marshala T. 2011. Effect of feeding bypass fat to lactating buffaloes during early lactation. In: Proceedings of 14th Biennial Conference of Animal Nutrition Society of India ‘Livestock Productivity Enhancement with Available Feed Resources’, Nov. 3-5, 2011, Pantnagar, India, pp. 111-2.

PIB. 2023. Brief note on 9 Years’ achievement of Department of Animal Husbandry & Dairying Prabina B J and K Kumar. 2010. Dried Azolla as a nutritionally rich cost-effective and immuno-modulatory feed supplement for broilers. The Asian Journal of Animal Science 5(1): 20-2.

Prasad C S, Gowda N K and Raman J V. 2001. Feeding strategies for enhance animal productivity. In proceeding X Animal Nutrition Conference, Karnal, held at NDRI Karnal from November 9-11, pp. 23-45.

Rohila H, Chhikara, S K Sihag, S Dhiman, D Kumar, R Kumar, R and N Vaquil. 2016. Effect of bypass fat supplementation on milk yield, milk fat, milk Protein, solid not fat and total solid in lactating Murrah buffaloes. Haryana veterinarian 55(2): 192-4.

Sahoo B, Kumar R, Garg A K, Mohanta R K, Agarwal A and Sharma A K. 2017. Effect of supplementing area specific mineral mixture on productive performance of crossbred cows. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 34(4), pp.414-9.

Sarkar S, Sharma A, Tariq H and Satapathy D. 2022. Role of rumen bypass nutrients in dairy animal’s health and productivity: A review. Indian Journal of Animal Research 1, p.9.

Shelke R R, Chavan S D and Kahate P A. 2018. Effect of feeding of urea ammoniated soybean straw on dry matter intake, yield and quality of cow milk. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 88(6): 727-30.

Tanwar P S, Kumar Y and Rathore R S. 2013. Effect of urea molasses mineral block (UMMB) supplementation on milk production in buffaloes under rural management practices. The Journal of Rural and Agricultural Research 13(2): 19-21.

Thakur S S and Shelke S K. 2010. Effect of supplementing bypass fat prepared from soybean acid oil on milk yield and nutrient utilization in Murrah buffaloes. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80(4): 354-7.

Thapa P, Pandey T, Acharya R and Dhital B. 2019. Effect of by- pass protein supplements on milk production of dairy cattle. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources 2(1): 171-9.

Tyagi N, Thakur S S and Shelke S K. 2009. Effect of feeding bypass fat supplement on milk yield, its composition and nutrient utilization in crossbred cows. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 26(1):1-8.

Verma D K, Gadegaonkar G M, Ramteke B N, Jaiswal S, Jagadale S D and Darban G. 2022. Effect of supplementation of probiotics and rumen buffer on performance of lactating buffaloes. Buffalo Bulletin 41(2): 293-8.

Wadhwa M, Grewal R S, Bakshi M P S and Brar P S. 2012. Effect of supplementing bypass fat on the performance of high yielding crossbred cows. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 82(2): 200-3.

Downloads

Submitted

2024-03-11

Published

2025-06-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

YADAV, S., DUBEY, . S. K. ., SINGH, S. K. ., SINGH, . R. ., YEMUL, S. N. ., SINGH, M. ., SINGH, S. K. ., SRIVASTAVA, A. K. ., & SINGH, S. . (2025). Farmer participatory assessment of nutritional interventions for productivity and profitability enhancement of dairy animals at small farms. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 95(3), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v95i3.149438
Citation