Characterizing morphological heterogeneity in porcine hepatocytes


125 / 96 / 50

Authors

  • KIRPAL SINGH Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004- Punjab image/svg+xml
  • VARINDER UPPAL Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004- Punjab image/svg+xml
  • NEELAM BANSAL Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004- Punjab image/svg+xml
  • ANURADHA GUPTA Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004- Punjab image/svg+xml
  • DEVENDRA PATHAK Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004- Punjab image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v95i2.151817

Keywords:

Hepatocytes, Heterogeneity, Morphology, Pig

Abstract

The present study was conducted on liver of eight pigs collected from local slaughter house, for gross anatomical, histological, histochemical, immunohistochemical and histoenzymic studies. The paraffin sections of 3 µm were cut and stained with different histomorphochemical stains. The cryostat sections of fresh frozen tissues of 10 µm thickness were cut at -20˚C and incubated in different substrates to localize phosphatases and Non-specific esterases. The left lateral lobe was significantly larger and quadrate lobe was shortest. The size of hepatocytes in periportal area was significantly more than size of hepatocytes in centrilobular area. The number of mononuclear hepatocytes was significantly more in periportal area than centrilobular area whereas number of binucleated hepatocytes didn’t vary significantly between periportal and centrilobular areas. The average no. of Kupffer cells in periportal region was significantly more than centrilobular area. The reaction for neutral mucopolysaccharides and glycogen was more in centrilobular hepatocytes, proteins were distributed homogeneously and reaction for lipids was more in centrilobular hepatocytes. Periportal hepatocytes exhibited a strong phosphatases activity whereas non-specific esterases activity was more in centrilobular hepatocytes. This work will contribute to the corpus of knowledge regarding the heterogeneity of hepatocytes, which enables the liver to carry out a variety of functions and enhances its complexity and adaptability in preserving the body’s homeostasis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdalla O, Arnautovic I and Fahmy M F. 1971. Anatomical study of the liver of the camel (Camelus dromedarius). 1. Topography and morphology. Acta Morphologica Neerlando- Scandinavica 9: 85-100.

Aziz S H. 1984. Gross, histomorphological and histochemical studies on liver of sheep. M. V. Sc. thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.

Bamaniya M K. 2013. Gross and histological studies on the liver of marwari goat (Capra hircus).’ M.V.Sc. Thesis, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bikaner.

Bhattacharya M, Saigal R and Baishya G. 1986. Histochemical localization of esterases and steroidogenic enzymes in goat liver. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 57: 662-65.

Bleser P, Geerts A, Lazou J M and Wisse E. 1991. Tissue distribution, quantitation and proliferation kinetics of fat‐storing cells in carbon tetrachloride–injured rat liver. Hepatology 13: 1193-202.

Bojan F. 1971. Observation on the fine structure of the normal porcine liver. Journal of Anatomy 108: 563-77.

Bouwens L, Baekeland M, De Zanger R and Wisse E. 1986. Quantitation, tissue distribution and proliferation ki- netics of kupffer cells in normal rat liver. Hepatology 6: 718-22.

Bozzola J J and Russell L D. 1999. Electron Microscopy: Principles and Techniques for Biologists. 2nd edn. pp 101-03. Jones and Bartlett Publishers International, London, UK.

Burt A D and Day C P. 2002. Pathophysiology of the liver. In: MacSween R N M, Burt A D, Portmann B C, Ishak K G, Scheuer P J and Anthony P P (Eds.) Pathology of the Liver, pp. 67-105. Churchill Livingstone, New York.

Bykov I, Ylipaasto P, Eerola L and Lindros K O. 2004. Functional differences between periportal and perivenous Kupffer cells isolated by digitonin-collagenase perfusion. Comprehensive Hepatolology 3: 34.

Chayen J, Butcher R G, Bitensky L and Poulter L W. 1969. A Guide to Practical Histochemistry. pp 83-174. Oliver and Boyl, Edinburg, England.

Dimitrios P, Bogdanos, Bin G and Gershwin M E. 2013. Liver Immunology. Comprehensive Physiology 3: 567.

Fehrenbach H, Weiskirchen R, Kasper M and Gressner A M. 2001. Upregulated expression of the receptor for advanced glycation end products in cultured rat hepatic stellate cells during trans differentiation to myofibroblasts. Hepatology 34: 943-52.

Garrido G, Guzman M and Odriozola J M. 1996. Effect of different types of high carbohydrate diets on glycogen metabolism in liver and skeletal muscle of endurane trained rats. Europian Journal of Applied Physiology and occupational Physiology 74: 91-9.

Gebhardt R. 1992. Metabolic zonation of the liver: regulation and implications for liver function. Pharmacology and Therapeutics 53: 275-354.

Grigoras A, Giusca E, Avadanei E, Amalinei C and Caruntu I . 2016. Pointing at Ito cell, from structure to function. Romanian Journal of Morphology Embryology 57: 915-23.

Gumucio J J and Miller D L. 1981. Functional implications of liver cell heterogeneity. Gastroenterology 80: 393-403.

Gundermann K J, Gundermann S, Drozdzik M and Prasad V M. 2016. Essential phospholipids in fatty liver: a scientific update. Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology 9: 105-17.

Jensen H, Rossing N, Andersen S B and Jarnum S. 1967. Albumin metabolism in the nephrotic syndrome in adults. Clinical Science 33: 445-57.

Junatas K L, Tonar Z, Kubikova T, Liska V, Palek R. 2017. Stereological analysis of size and density of hepatocytes in the porcine liver. Journal of Anatomy 230: 575-88.

Kalita P, Doley P, Choudhary O, Das H and Debroy S. 2019. Liver and pancreas of mizo local pig (Zovawk): Ahistomorphological and histochemical analysis. International Journal of Livestock Research 9: 150-56.

Kimura Y, Selmi C, Leung P S, Mao T K, Schauer J, Watnik M and Invernizzi P. 2005. Genetic polymorphisms influencing xenobiotic metabolism and transport in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 41: 55-63.

Krishna M. 2013. Clinical Liver Disease. Official Learning Resource, New Delhi pp. 23-34.

Lalla S and Drommer W. 1997. Observations on the fine structure of the liver in the camel (Camelus dromedarius). Anatomia Histologia Embryologia 26: 271-75.

Luna L G. 1968. Manual of Histological Staining Methods of Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. 3rd Edn. pp 38-196. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, USA

MacSween R M, Desmet V J, Roskams T and Scothorne R J. 2002. Developmental anatomy and normal structure. In: Pathology of the Liver (eds.). pp. 1-66. Churchill Livingstone, New York.

Magari S, Fujikawa K, Mizutani Y and Nishi A. 1979. Morphological studies on liver lymphatics. Lymphology 12: 14-7.

Mahata T K, Ghosh R, Guha K, Bhattacharyya M K and Jana C. 2003. Studies on histomorphological architecture of the liver of spotted deer (Cervus axis). Indian Journal of Animal Health 42: 71-4.

Malarkey D E, Johnson K, Ryan L, Boorman G and Maronpot R R. 2005. New insights into functional aspects of liver morphology. Toxicologic Pathology 33: 27-34.

Meier-Ruge, William A and Bruder E. 2008. Current concepts of enzyme histochemistry in modern pathology. Pathobiology 75: 233-43.

Natarajan A, Wagner B, and Sibilia M. 2007. The EGF receptor is required for efficient liver regeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 17081-86.

Nicotera P, Hartzell P, Davis G and Orrenius S. 1986. The formation of plasma membrane blebs in hepatocytes exposed to agents that increase cytosolic Ca2+ is mediated by the activation of a non-lysosomal proteolytic system. FEBS Letters 209(1): 139-44.

Pareek P. 2000. ‘Gross and Histological studies of the liver in Magra Sheep (Ovis aries)’. M.V.Sc. Thesis, College of Veterinary and Animal Science, Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, India.

Parker G A and Picut C A. 2011. Immune functions in nonlymphoid organs: The Liver. Toxicology Pathology 40: 237-47.

Pearse A G E. 1972. Histochemistry: Theoretical and Applied. 3rd edn. Vol II. Churchill Livingstone, London

Popescu R, Filimon M N, Dumitrescu G, Ciochina L P, Dumitrascu V, Vlad D and Verdes D. 2012. Histological and morphometrical studies in liver regeneration in mice. Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies 45: 15-8.

Racine‐Samson L, Scoazec J, D’Errico A, Fiorentino M, Christa L, Moreau A and Feldmann G. 1996. The metabolic organization of the adult human liver: a comparative study of normal, fibrotic, and cirrhotic liver tissue. Hepatology 24: 104-13.

Ramos E H, De Bongioanni L C and Stoppani A O M. 1980. Kinetics of L-[14C] leucine transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effect of energy coupling inhibitors. Biochemica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes 599: 214-31.

Ratziu V and Friedman S L. 1997. Pathobiology of hepatic stellate cells. Functional Heterogeneity of Liver Tissue: From Cell Lineage Diversity to Sublobular Compartment-Specific Pathogenesis 133-60.

Sasan J S, Sharma A, Sarma K, Suri S and Malik M R. 2017. A quantitative histological study of the liver of pig (Sus Scrofa). Indian Journal of Veterinary Anatomy 94: 14-16.

Schreiber G, Lesch R, Weinssen U and Zahringer J. 1970. The distribution of albumin synthesis throughout the liver lobule. The Journal of Cell Biology 47: 285-89.

Shahien Y M, Fahmy M F and Sokkar S M. 1977. A histochemical study on the liver of normal camels. Veterinary Medical Journal (Cairo) 25: 261-70.

Sheehan D C and Hrapchak B B. 1973. Theory and Practice of Histotechnology. 1st Edn. pp 80-172. The C. V. Mosby Company, Saint Louis, USA.

Siddig R, Abdalla A and Ismail H. 2015. Some histochemical and morphometric observations on the liver of the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius). Journal of Animal Scientific Research 3: 503-11.

Singh K, Uppal V, Bansal N and Gupta A. 2019: Histoenzymic localization of oxidoreductases in pig liver. Indian Journal of Veterinary Anatomy 31(2): 122-24.

Surina-Baumgartner D M, Arnold M, Moses A and Langhans W. 1996. Metabolic effects of a fat- and carbo-hydrate rich meal in rats. Physiology & Behavior 59 (4-5): 973-81.

Swindle M M, Makin A, Herron A J, Clubb F J and Frazier K S. 2012. Swine as model in biomedical research and toxicology testing. Veterinary Pathology 49: 344-56.

Tanami S, Ben-Moshe S and Elkayam A. 2016. Dynamic zonation of liver polyploidy. Cell Tissue Research 15: 18-21.

Van Noorden C J, Vogels I M, and James J. 1994. Adaptive sex‐dependent changes in the zonation of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in rat liver lobules after partial hepatectomy. Hepatology, 20: 714-24.

White E G. 1973. Some observations on the liver of the pig: The hepatic lobule and liver cell during Post-natal growth. Animal Pathology 24: 15-8.

Submitted

2024-05-21

Published

2025-02-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGH, K. ., UPPAL, V. ., BANSAL, N. ., GUPTA, A. ., & PATHAK, D. . (2025). Characterizing morphological heterogeneity in porcine hepatocytes. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 95(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v95i2.151817
Citation