Systemic investigation of pelvimetric profile in three strains of Deoni cattle


156 / 225

Authors

  • RAMTEKE SNEHAL SHALIK College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Udgir, District Latur, Maharashtra
  • KOLI ANUJKUMAR BRAMHADEV College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Udgir, District Latur, Maharashtra
  • PATIL ANIL DINKARRAO College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Udgir, District Latur, Maharashtra
  • NATKAR SONALI BABURAO College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Udgir, District Latur, Maharashtra
  • SHENDE ASHISH MUKUNDA Nagpur Veterinary College, Nagpur, Maharashtra
  • DONGRE VILAS BHAGWANRAO College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Udgir, District Latur, Maharashtra

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v94i10.152293

Keywords:

Deoni, Dystocia, Pelvimetry

Abstract

The present research work was designed to establish baseline data of the pelvimetric profile in Deoni Cattle. Deoni cattle (270) of three strains, i.e. Wannera, Balankya and Shevera were selected and divided into six age groups: Group I (12 to 24 months), II (25 to 36 months), III (37 to 48 months), IV (49 to 60 months), V (61 to 72 months) and VI (73 to 84 months) with 45 animals in each group. Body weight along with different pelvimetric parameters such as distance between two angles of haunch (A), distance between two ischial tuberosities (B), distance between level of croup and hip joint (C) and distance between tuber coxae and tuber ischia (D) were measured to determine the transverse and vertical diameter of pelvic inlet and outlet which were used to calculate pelvic area of inlet and outlet. The pelvic area values for both inlet and outlet showed highly significant differences within groups, but no significant difference was observed between the three strains of each group. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the pelvic area of Deoni cattle increases with the age and it has significant positive correlation with the parity and body weight. Thus, pelvimetric profile can be used as a marker for selection of young Deoni heifers and cows for breeding purposes to lower dystocia incidences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basak S and Das D N. 2018. Productive and reproductive performances of balankya, wannera and waghya strains of deoni cattle. Exploratory Animal and Medical Research 8(1): 76–78.

Bila L, Tyasi T L, Fourie P and Katikati A. 2021. Classification and regression tree analysis to predict calving ease in Sussex heifers using pelvic area dimensions and morphological traits. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 8(1): 164–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2021.h499

Coopman F, De Smet S, Gengler N, Haegeman A, Jacobs K, Van Pouck M, Laevens H, Van Zeveren A and Groen A F. 2003. Estimating internal pelvic sizes using external body measurements in the double-muscled Belgian Blue beef breed. Animal Science 76(2): 229–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800053480

Dongre V B Kokate L S, Salunke V, Jadhav P, Khandait V, Durge S and Patil P. 2017. Effect of non-genetic factors on production and reproduction traits in Deoni cattle. International Journal of Livestock Research 7(9): 220–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20170615051642

Fleming G and Craig J F. 1930. Fleming’s Veterinary Obstetrics. Baillière, Tindall and Cox.

Hiew M W and Constable P D. 2015. The usage of pelvimetry to predict dystocia in cattle. The Malaysian Journal of Veterinary Research 27(2): 1–4.

Holm D E, Webb E C and Thompson P N. 2014. A new application of pelvis area data as culling tool to aid in the management of dystocia in heifers. Journal of Animal Science 92(5): 2296– 2303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6967

Kolkman I G, Hoflack, Aerts S, Murray R D, Opsomer G and Lips D. 2009. Evaluation of the Rice pelvimeter for measuring pelvic area in double muscled Belgian Blue cows. Livestock Science 121(2-3): 259–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.06.022

Lalrintiuanga K and Lallianchhunga M C. 2012. Pelvimetry in local breed of cows in Mizoram. Indian Journal of Animal Research 46(2): 199–201.

Oliveira C A D, Bombonato P P, Baruselli P S, Oliveira J F S D and Souza A D O. 2001. Pelvimetry and pelvilogy in female mixed buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science 38: 114–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-95962001000300004

Perumal P, Chamuah J K and Rajkhowa C. 2013. Pelvimetry of mithun (Bos frontalis) cows. The Indian Veterinary Journal 90(6): 123–25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/165348

Perumal P. 2013. Pelvimetry in swamp buffalo cows of Nagaland. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83(9): 932–33.

Perumal P and Rajkhowa C. 2013. Pelvimetry of thotho (Bos indicus) cows. The Indian Veterinary Journal 90(11): 39–41.

Perumal P, De A K, Bhattacharya K M D, Sunder A, Kundu A and Ahmad S Z. 2019. Pelvimetric profiles in crossbred cows of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 89(6): 637–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i6.91119

Smeaton D C. 2004. Factors associated with calving difficulty in embryo transfer mated cattle. New Zealand Society of Animal Production 4: 252–56.

Swami S G. 2017. ‘Reproductive parameters related with estrus and parturition in Marathwadi buffaloes.’ M.V.Sc. Thesis, MAFSU, Nagpur.

Van Donkersgoed J, Ribble C S, Townsend H G and Janzen E D. 1990. The usefulness of pelvic area measurements as an on- farm test for predicting calving difficulty in beef heifers. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 31(3): 190–93.

Waziri M A, Gabakan Y J and Mustapha A R. 2011. Pelvimetry of Kuri and Bunaji cows in Maiduguri metropolitan slaughter house, Northern Nigeria. Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences 9(2): 7–10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/sokjvs.v10i2.

Downloads

Submitted

2024-06-05

Published

2024-10-08

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

SHALIK, R. S. ., BRAMHADEV, K. A. ., DINKARRAO, P. A. ., BABURAO, N. S. ., MUKUNDA, S. A. ., & BHAGWANRAO, D. V. . (2024). Systemic investigation of pelvimetric profile in three strains of Deoni cattle. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 94(10), 852–855. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v94i10.152293
Citation