Farmers’ preferences and breeding practices for indigenous cattle breeds in breeding tract of Karnataka

CHETHAN PATIL N D; K S  KADIAN; SAPNA  JARIAL; RAHUL DUNDESH  BELLAGI; DAYANAND  PATIL; SUJEET KUMAR  JHA; SABYASACHI  MUKHERJEE

doi:10.56093/ijans.v94i11.155044

Authors

CHETHAN PATIL N D Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, Punjab
K S KADIAN ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana
SAPNA JARIAL Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, Punjab
RAHUL DUNDESH BELLAGI Indian Council of Social Science Research Centre for Multidisciplinary Development Research, Dharwad, Karnataka
DAYANAND PATIL ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana
SUJEET KUMAR JHA Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi
SABYASACHI MUKHERJEE ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v94i11.155044

Keywords:

Breeding practices, Indigenous cattle, Livelihood, Preferential traits

Abstract

The present study aimed to assess the breeding practices, trait preferences, and selection criteria among farmers, rearing three Indigenous Cattle (IC) breeds, i.e. Amritmahal, Hallikar, and Malnad Gidda in Karnataka. Data were gathered from 360 cattle owners across six districts which were the breeding tract of breeds using a semi-structured questionnaire. The findings revealed that oestrous detection is primarily identified through bellowing (95.83%) and mounting (81.39%). Breeding practices vary, with 59.72% of farmers relying exclusively on natural service (NS), while 21.67% use artificial insemination (AI). Malnad Gidda rearing farmers exclusively use NS, reflecting the breed’s recent recognition and the limited availability of AI services. Farmers prioritise traits such as high adaptability, multi-utility, and easy maintenance, with variations specific to each breed. Amritmahal is valued for its multi-utility and traction power; Hallikar for its traction power and religious/cultural significance, and Malnad Gidda for its adaptability and easy maintenance. Selection of cows is heavily based on conformation traits, with udder size and pelvic width being the most critical across all breeds. The study highlights farmers’ diverse preferences and practices, shaped by the distinct characteristics and utilities of each IC breed. These insights can guide breeding programs and policy decisions focussed on preserving and enhancing indigenous cattle breeds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Behl R, Behl J D, Kulkarni V S and Jain A. 2023. Ruminant genetic resources of Karnataka state: Status, distribution and characteristics. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 93(2): 123–32. https://doi.org/10.56093/IJANS. 93I2.103774.

Bhandari G, Chandel B S and Malhotra R. 2022. Beyond economic motives: Value of indigenous dairy cattle breed for the livestock keepers in India. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 92(5): 630–35.

Chenyambuga S W and Lekule F P. 2014. Breed preference and breeding practices for goats in agro-pastoral communities of semi-arid and sub-humid areas in Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development 26(6): 117.

DAHD. 2022. Animal Husbandry Statistics (AHS) | Department of Animal Husbandry & Dairying. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmer Welfare. https://dahd.nic.in/schemes/programmes/animal-husbandry-statistics

ICAR. 2024. Ten New Breeds of Indigenous Farm Animals Registered by ICAR-NBAGR | ICAR. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmer Welfare. https://icar.org.in/ten-new-breeds- indigenous-farm-animals-registered-icar-nbagr

Kolekar D V, Gowda M J C, Sairam, C V, Dixit S and Singh R. 2023. Productivity attributes of six desi cow breeds in Karnataka. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 93(3): 279–86. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v93i3.104425

Li C, Zhang F, Pan Chun K, Shantharaju A, Aminul Islam M, Kath J M, Mushtaq S, Muniyappa, A and Singh-Peterson L. 2024. Understanding constraints and enablers of climate risk management strategies: evidence from smallholder dairy farmers in regional South India. Sustainability 16(5): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU16052018.

Msanga Y N, Mwakilembe P L and Sendalo D. 2012. The indigenous cattle of the southern highlands of Tanzania: Distinct phenotypic features, performance, and uses. Livestock Research for Rural Development 24: 1–14.

Ngowi E E, Chenyambuga S W and Gwakisa P S. 2008. Socio- economic values and traditional management practices of Tarime zebu cattle in Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development 20.

Ouma E, Abdulai A and Drucke A. 2005. Assessment of farmer preferences for cattle traits in cattle production systems of Kenya. The future of rural Europe in the global agri-food system, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 24-27.

Pen M, Savageb, D, Stiirc W and Senga M. 2009. Constraints to cattle production of small-scale farmers in Kampong Cham Province, Cambodia. Conference on International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development, Tropentag 2009 University of Hamburg, October 6-8, 2009. Retrieved on 22 May, 2016 from http:// www.tropentag.de/2009/abstracts/full/528.pdf

Radder S K, Bhanja S K and Kaul P N. 2010. Cattle rearing patterns of farmers in northern Karnataka. International Journal of Rural Studies 17: 1–5.

SAS. 2022. SAS Software Version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc. Available at: https://www.sas.com

Selvan A S, Thangaraj S, Dash S, Karthikeyan A and Karthickeyan S M. 2022. Multivariate analysis of morphometric traits of Malaimadu cattle—autochthonous draft cattle of South India. Tropical Animal Health and Production 55(6).

Siddiquee N U, Rahman S M A, Bhuiyan M S A, Rahman A K M A, Amin M R and Bhuiyan A K H. 2013. Practice, preference and performance of cattle under peri-urban dairy management system in Mymensingh. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science 42(2): 89–95.

Silva L P, Nanayakkara V, Jianlin I I, llanotte O, Chandrasiri A D N and Ilerath H M S P. 2006. Genetic characterization of native cattle in Sri Lanka. Proceedings of AAAP Animal Science Congress 2006 September IS - 22, 2006. Busan, Korea.

SPSS. 2022. IBM SPSS Statistics 20. IBM. https://www.ibm.com/ support/pages/downloading-ibm-spss-statistics-20

Tada O, Muchenje V and Dzama K. 2013. Preferential traits for breeding Nguni cattle in low-input in-situ conservation production systems. Springer Plus 2: 1–7.