Effect of feeding protected protein on productive performance in dairy cows

SIKHAMONI  HALOI; ROBIN  BHUYAN; BIBEKA NANDA  SAIKIA; LAKHYAJYOTI  BORAH; PAPORI  TALUKDAR; ANUBHA  BARUAH; JOGI RAJ  BORA; SHANTANU  TAMULY; JAKIR  HUSSAIN; SALUR  SRIHITHA; CHANDRA PRAKASH  DIXIT

doi:10.56093/ijans.v95i7.166908

Authors

SIKHAMONI HALOI College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
ROBIN BHUYAN College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
BIBEKA NANDA SAIKIA College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
LAKHYAJYOTI BORAH College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
PAPORI TALUKDAR College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
ANUBHA BARUAH College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
JOGI RAJ BORA College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
SHANTANU TAMULY College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
JAKIR HUSSAIN College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
SALUR SRIHITHA Institute of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be university), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
CHANDRA PRAKASH DIXIT Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Krishi Bhawan, Delhi, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v95i7.166908

Keywords:

Crossbred cows, Milk yield, Protected proteins, Rumen degradable protein, Undegradable dietary protein

Abstract

An experiment was conducted on lactating crossbred cows for assessing feeding effect of heat treated (HTSBM) and formaldehyde treated (FTSBM) soybean meal on productive performance of crossbred cows. Untreated soyabean meal (UTSBM) served as control group and HTSBM and FTSBM as treatment groups. Feeding of roughage and concentrate mixture having soybean meal (untreated) was offered in UTSBM group; while concentrate mixture with heat treated and formaldehyde treated soybean meal was offered to HTSBM and FTSBM group, respectively (n=8). Results showed that feeding HTSBM and FTSBM did not have significant effect on average dry matter (DM) intake (kg/Day) of cows. The cows fed HTSBM and FTSBM diets had a higher dry matter (P<0.05) and crude protein (P<0.01) digestibility than cows fed UTSBM diet. However digestibility of all other nutrients did not differ significantly among groups. Heat and formaldehyde treatments reduced (P<0.01) rumen degradable protein and increased (P<0.01) undegradable dietary protein in soybean meal. The average daily milk yield and fat corrected milk yield (kg/Day) was significantly higher (P<0.01) in HTSBM (9.01 ± 0.14 and 9.42 ± 0.17) and FTSBM (8.93± 0.14 and 9.30 ± 0.18) groups compared to UTSBM (7.70 ± 0.98 and 8.12 ± 0.16) group. The milk parameters like fat, protein, lactose, total solid and solid not fat did not differ significantly among groups. The feed cost per kg of milk was lower in HTSBM and FTSBM groups compared to UTSBM group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansia I, Stein H, Brokner C, Hayes C and Drackley J. 2021. Nutrient digestibility and endogenous protein losses in the foregut and small intestine of weaned dairy calves fed calf starters with conventional or enzyme-treated soybean meal. Journal of Dairy Science 104(3): 2979-2995. https://doi. org/10.3168/jds.2020-18776.

AOAC. 2007. Official methods of analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18th edn. USDA, Washington, DC.

Arifuddin M, Yakupitiyage A, Tumwasorn S, Hansen G and Parkpian P. 2022. Effects of formaldehyde-treated soybean meal on sheep performance. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1075: 012007. https://doi. org/10.1088/1755-315/1075/1/012007.

Assoumani M, Vedeau F, Jacquot L and Sniffen C. 1992. Refinement of an enzymatic method for estimating the theoretical degradability of proteins in feedstuffs for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 39: 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90054-A.

Chesini R, Takiya C, Dias M, Silva T, Nunes A, Grigoletto N, Silva G, Vittorazzi P, Renno L and Renno F. 2022. Dietary replacement of soybean meal with heat-treated soybean meal or high-protein corn distillers grains on nutrient digestibility and milk composition in mid-lactation cows. Journal of Dairy Science 106(1): 233-44. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-21904.

Chore N, Chavan S, Shelke R and Kahate P. 2017. Effect of formaldehyde-treated concentrate, urea and soybean meal on compound growth rate of milk yield and correlation studies in lactating cows. Asian Journal of Animal Science. 12: 61–69. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/TAJAS/12.1/61-69.

Cueva S, Raisanen S, Wasson D, Lage C, Silvestre T, Kniffen D, Fabin R and Hristov A. 2023. Production effects of extruded soybean meal replacing canola meal in the diet of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 106(9): 6198-6215. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22818.

Dosky K N. 2012. Effect of protected soybean meal on milk yield and composition in local Meriz goats. Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture 40(1): 1–8.

Faldet M A, Satter L D and Broderick G A. 1992. Determining optimal heat treatment of soybeans by measuring available lysine chemically and biologically with rats to maximize protein utilization by ruminants. Journal of Nutrition 122(1): 151–60.

Fessenden S, Ross D, Block E and Amburgh M. 2020. Comparison of milk production, intake, and total-tract nutrient digestion in lactating dairy cattle fed diets containing either wheat midds and urea, commercial fermentation by-product, or rumen-protected soybean meal. Journal of Dairy Science 103(6): 5090-5101. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17744.

Firozi F, Dayani O, Tahmasbi R and Tajaddini M. 2023. Feed intake and milk yield and composition of lactating dairy goats in response to partial substitution of soybean meal for formaldehyde-treated sesame meal in the diet. Archives of Animal Nutrition 77: 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2023.2241338.

Gidlund H, Hetta M, Krizsan S, Lemosquet S and Huhtanen P. 2015. Effects of soybean meal or canola meal on milk production and methane emissions in lactating dairy cows fed grass silage-based diets. Journal of Dairy Science 98(11): 8093–8106. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9757.

Gullickson G, Nichols M, Entzie Y, Hansen L, Underdahl S, Tobin C, Swanson K and Carlson Z. 2023. The effects of replacing dried distillers grains with solubles with a heat-treated soybean meal in forage-based growing cattle diets. Journal of Animal Science 101: 294-295. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/ skad281.351.

ICAR. 2013. Nutrient Requirements of Animals – Cattle and Buffalo. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.

Kaufman J, Pohler K, Mulliniks J and Rius A. 2018. Lowering rumen-degradable and rumen-undegradable protein improved amino acid metabolism and energy utilization in lactating dairy cows exposed to heat stress. Journal of Dairy Science 101(1): 386–395. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13341.

Licitra G, Lauria F, Carpino S, Schadt I, Sniffen C J and Van Soest P J. 1998. Improvement of the Streptomyces griseus method for degradable protein in ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 72: 1–10.

Marques O, De Oliveira E, Gandra J, Peixoto E, Monção F, De Araujo Gabriel A, Neves N, Silva J, Banys V and De Lima B. 2023. Dietary replacement of soybean meal with heat-treated grain soybean in diets of feedlot-finished beef cattle: impacts on intake, digestibility, and ruminal parameters. Tropical Animal Health and Production 56(1): 13. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11250-023-03862-3.

Mustafa K. 2021. Effect of formaldehyde-protected diets on milk yield, composition, and some blood biochemical parameters in Karadi ewes. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences 52(5): 1094-1100. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v52i5.1447.

Okon P, Bachmann M, Wensch-Dorendorf M, Titze N, Rodehutscord M, Rupp C, Susenbeth A, Greef J and Zeyner A. 2023. Feed clusters according to in situ and in vitro ruminal crude protein degradation. Animals 13(2): 224. https://doi. org/10.3390/ani13020224.

Overman O R and Gaines W L. 1933. Milk energy formulas for various breeds of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Research 46: 1109–20.

Patel V R, Gupta R S, Parnerkar S, Jani V R and Garg D D. 2012. Performance of buffalo heifers fed on bypass protein: An on-farm appraisal. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 12(3): 395–402.

Paula E, Monteiro H, Silva L, Benedeti P, Daniel J, Shenkoru T, Broderick G and Faciola A. 2017. Effects of replacing soybean meal with canola meal differing in rumen-undegradable protein content on ruminal fermentation and gas production kinetics using two in vitro systems. Journal of Dairy Science 100: 5281–92. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12301.

Pereira M, Junior N, Oliveira R, Salvati G and Pereira R. 2021. Methionine precursor effects on lactation performance of dairy cows fed raw or heated soybeans. Journal of Dairy Science 104(3): 2996-3007. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18696.

Petzel E, Acharya S, Titgemeyer E, Bailey E and Brake D. 2024. Effects of heating soybeans on postruminal amino acid bioavailability, performance, and ruminal fermentation in lactating cows. Journal of Animal Science 102:skae084. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae084.

Roe M, Chase L and Sniffen C. 1991. Comparison of in vitro techniques to the in situ technique for estimation of ruminal degradation of protein. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 1632–1640. https://doi.org/10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(91)78325-2.

Savari M, Firouzabadi M, Mohammadi F, Abigaba R, Rayshan A, Gharagozloo A and Abdollahzadeh F. 2024. Effects of rumen undegradable protein source on feed intake and milk yield of Holstein dairy cows. South African Journal of Animal Science. 53(5): 764-774.https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v53i5.15.

Sirohi S K, Walli T K, Garg M R and Kumar B. 2013. Effect of formaldehyde-treated mustard cake on nutrient utilization and milk production performance in crossbred cows fed wheat straw-based diet. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 30: 5–11.

Tiwari M R, Jha P K, Pant S R, Acharya M P, Thapa P and Shrestha B K. 2018. Effect of bypass protein supplement on milk production in Jersey cows: Bypass protein supplementation in dairy cows. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science 47: 98–104.

Tomankova O and Kopecny J. 1995. Prediction of feed protein degradation in the rumen with bromelain. Animal Feed Science and Technology 53: 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00735-R.

Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583.

Walli T K. 2005. Bypass protein technology and the impact of feeding bypass protein to dairy cows in the tropics: A review. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 75: 135–142.

Walli T K. 2008. Bypass protein technology—a success story in feeding dairy animals for increased milk production at a cheaper cost. Indian Dairyman 60: 53–60.