Optimizing Productive Performance in Crossbred Cows through Feeding of Protected Protein


10

Authors

  • Sikhamoni Haloi Department of Animal Nutrition, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
  • Robin Bhuyan Department of Animal Nutrition, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
  • Bibeka Nanda Saikia Department of Animal Nutrition, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India.
  • Lakhyajyoti Borah Department of Animal Nutrition, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India.
  • Papori Talukdar Department of Animal Nutrition, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
  • Anubha Baruah Department of Veterinary Physiology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India.
  • Jogi Raj Bora Department of Livestock Production and Management, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
  • Shantanu Tamuly Department of Veterinary Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
  • Jakir Hussain Department of Livestock Production and Management, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India.
  • Salur Srihitha Institute of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be university), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
  • CHANDRA PRAKASH DIXIT MINISTRY OF FISHERIES, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND DAIRYING

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v95i7.166908

Keywords:

Crossbred cows, Milk yield, Protected proteins, Rumen degradable protein, Undegradable dietary protein

Abstract

An experiment was conducted on lactating crossbred cows for assessing feeding effect of heat treated and formaldehyde treated soybean meal on productive performance of crossbred cows. Animals were divided into three groups (UTSBM, HTSBM and FTSBM) with eight animals in each. UTSBM served as control group and HTSBM and FTSBM as treatment groups. Feeding of roughage and concentrate mixture having soybean meal (untreated) was offered in UTSBM group; while concentrate mixture with heat treated and formaldehyde treated soybean meal was offered to HTSBM and FTSBM group, respectively. Results showed that feeding heat treated and formaldehyde treated soybean meal did not have significant effect on average dry matter (DM) intake (kg/Day) of cows. The cows fed HTSBM and FTSBM diets had a higher dry matter (P<0.05) and crude protein (P<0.01) digestibility than cows fed UTSBM diet. However digestibility of all other nutrients did not differ significantly among groups. Heat and formaldehyde treatments reduced (P<0.01) rumen degradable protein and increased (P<0.01) undegradable dietary protein in soybean meal. The average daily milk yield and fat corrected milk yield (kg/Day) was significantly higher (P<0.01) in HTSBM (9.01 ± 0.14 and 9.42 ± 0.17) and FTSBM (8.93± 0.14 and 9.30 ± 0.18) groups compared to UTSBM (7.70 ± 0.98 and 8.12 ± 0.16) group. The milk parameters like fat, protein, lactose, total solid and solid not fat did not differ significantly among groups. The feed cost per kg of milk was lower in HTSBM and FTSBM groups compared to UTSBM group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansia, I., Stein, H., Brokner, C., Hayes, C., Drackley, J. (2021). Nutrient digestibility and endogenous protein losses in the foregut and small intestine of weaned dairy calves fed calf starters with conventional or enzyme-treated soybean meal. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18776.

Ansia, I., Stein, H., Vermeire, D., Brøkner, C., Drackley, J. (2020). Ileal digestibility and endogenous protein losses of milk replacers based on whey proteins alone or with an enzyme-treated soybean meal in young dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17699.

AOAC. (2007). Official methods of analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18th edn. USDA, Washington, DC.

Arifuddin, M., Yakupitiyage, A., Tumwasorn, S., Hansen, G. and Parkpian, P. (2022). Effects of formaldehyde-treated soybean meal on sheep performance. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1075/1/012007.

Assoumani, M., Vedeau, F., Jacquot, L. and Sniffen, C. (1992). Refinement of an enzymatic method for estimating the theoretical degradability of proteins in feedstuffs for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 39: 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90054-A.

Chesini, R., Takiya, C., Dias, M., Silva, T., Nunes, A., Grigoletto, N., Silva, G., Vittorazzi, P., Rennó, L. and Rennó, F. (2022). Dietary replacement of soybean meal with heat-treated soybean meal or high-protein corn distillers grains on nutrient digestibility and milk composition in mid-lactation cows. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-21904.

Chore, N., Chavan, S., Shelke, R. and Kahate, P. (2017). Effect of formaldehyde-treated concentrate, urea and soybean meal on compound growth rate of milk yield and correlation studies in lactating cows. Asian Journal of Animal Science. 12: 61–69. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/TAJAS/12.1/61-69.

Cueva, S., Räisänen, S., Wasson, D., Lage, C., Silvestre, T., Kniffen, D., Fabin, R. and Hristov, A. (2023). Production effects of extruded soybean meal replacing canola meal in the diet of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22818.

Dosky, K.N. (2012). Effect of protected soybean meal on milk yield and composition in local Meriz goats. Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture. 40(1): 1–8.

Faldet, M.A., Satter, L.D. and Broderick, G.A. (1992). Determining optimal heat treatment of soybeans by measuring available lysine chemically and biologically with rats to maximize protein utilization by ruminants. Journal of Nutrition. 122(1): 151–160.

Fessenden, S., Ross, D., Block, E. and Amburgh, M. (2020). Comparison of milk production, intake, and total-tract nutrient digestion in lactating dairy cattle fed diets containing either wheat midds and urea, commercial fermentation by-product, or rumen-protected soybean meal. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17744.

Firozi, F., Dayani, O., Tahmasbi, R. and Tajaddini, M. (2023). Feed intake and milk yield and composition of lactating dairy goats in response to partial substitution of soybean meal for formaldehyde-treated sesame meal in the diet. Archives of Animal Nutrition. 77: 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2023.2241338.

Giallongo, F., Oh, J., Frederick, T., Isenberg, B., Kniffen, D., Fabin, R. and Hristov, A. (2015). Extruded soybean meal increased feed intake and milk production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 98(9): 6471–6485. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9786.

Gidlund, H., Hetta, M., Krizsan, S., Lemosquet, S. and Huhtanen, P. (2015). Effects of soybean meal or canola meal on milk production and methane emissions in lactating dairy cows fed grass silage-based diets. Journal of Dairy Science. 98(11): 8093–8106. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9757.

Gullickson, G., Nichols, M., Entzie, Y., Hansen, L., Underdahl, S., Tobin, C., Swanson, K. and Carlson, Z. (2023). The effects of replacing dried distillers grains with solubles with a heat-treated soybean meal in forage-based growing cattle diets. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skad281.351.

ICAR. (2013). Nutrient Requirements of Animals – Cattle and Buffalo. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.

Kaufman, J., Pohler, K., Mulliniks, J. and Ríus, A. (2018). Lowering rumen-degradable and rumen-undegradable protein improved amino acid metabolism and energy utilization in lactating dairy cows exposed to heat stress. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(1): 386–395. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13341.

Licitra, G., Lauria, F., Carpino, S., Schadt, I., Sniffen, C.J. and Van Soest, P.J. (1998). Improvement of the Streptomyces griseus method for degradable protein in ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 72(1–2): 1–10.

Mustafa, K. (2021). Effect of formaldehyde-protected diets on milk yield, composition, and some blood biochemical parameters in Karadi ewes. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 52(5). https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v52i5.1447.

Okon, P., Bachmann, M., Wensch-Dorendorf, M., Titze, N., Rodehutscord, M., Rupp, C., Susenbeth, A., Greef, J. and Zeyner, A. (2023). Feed clusters according to in situ and in vitro ruminal crude protein degradation. Animals, 13: 20224. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020224.

Overman, O.R. and Gaines, W.L. (1933). Milk energy formulas for various breeds of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Research, 46: 1109-1120.

Patel, V. R., Gupta, R. S., Parnerkar, S., Jani, V. R., Garg, D. D. (2012). Performance of Buffalo Heifers fed on Bypass Protein: An On-farm Appraisal. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 12(3): 395-402.

Paula, E., Monteiro, H., Silva, L., Benedeti, P., Daniel, J., Shenkoru, T., Broderick, G. and Faciola, A. (2017). Effects of replacing soybean meal with canola meal differing in rumen-undegradable protein content on ruminal fermentation and gas production kinetics using two in vitro systems. Journal of Dairy Science, 100: 5281-5292. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12301.

Pereira, M., Junior, N., Oliveira, R., Salvati, G. and Pereira, R. (2021). Methionine precursor effects on lactation performance of dairy cows fed raw or heated soybeans. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18696.

Roe, M., Chase, L. and Sniffen, C. (1991). Comparison of in vitro techniques to the in situ technique for estimation of ruminal degradation of protein. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 1632-1640. https://doi.org/10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(91)78325-2.

Sirohi, S.K., Walli, T.K., Garg, M.R. and Kumar, B. (2013). Effect of formaldehyde-treated mustard cake on nutrient utilization and milk production performance in crossbred cows fed wheat straw-based diet. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 30: 5-11.

Tiwari, M.R., Jha, P.K., Pant, S.R., Acharya, M.P., Thapa, P. and Shrestha, B.K. (2018). Effect of bypass protein supplement on milk production in Jersey cows: Bypass protein supplementation in dairy cows. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science, 47: 98-104.

Tomankova, O. and Kopecny, J. (1995). Prediction of feed protein degradation in the rumen with bromelain. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 53: 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00735-R.

Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583.

Walli, T.K. (2005). Bypass protein technology and the impact of feeding bypass protein to dairy cows in the tropics: A review. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 75: 135-142.

Walli, T.K. (2008). Bypass protein technology—A success story in feeding dairy animals for increased milk production at a cheaper cost. Indian Dairyman, 60: 53-60.

Submitted

2025-05-20

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Sikhamoni Haloi, Robin Bhuyan, Bibeka Nanda Saikia, Lakhyajyoti Borah, Papori Talukdar, Anubha Baruah, Jogi Raj Bora, Shantanu Tamuly, Jakir Hussain, Salur Srihitha, & DIXIT, C. P. (2025). Optimizing Productive Performance in Crossbred Cows through Feeding of Protected Protein. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 95(7). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v95i7.166908
Citation