Innovative strategies using organic agricultural waste and lime for housefly control in poultry farms


192 / 146

Authors

  • ANKUSH GAUTAM Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University- 141 001, Ludhiana image/svg+xml
  • YASHPAL SINGH Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University- 141 001, Ludhiana image/svg+xml
  • RAVINDER SINGH CHANDI Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University- 141 001, Ludhiana image/svg+xml
  • P P DUBEY Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University- 141 001, Ludhiana image/svg+xml
  • DALJEET KAUR Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University- 141 001, Ludhiana image/svg+xml
  • PARMINDER SINGH Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University- 141 001, Ludhiana image/svg+xml
  • NEERAJ KASHYAP Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University- 141 001, Ludhiana image/svg+xml
  • DS MAILK Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University- 141 001, Ludhiana image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v95i10.167616

Keywords:

Feces Moisture, Housefly, Sustainable

Abstract

The intensification of poultry production systems has led to substantial accumulation of poultry waste, creating conducive conditions for housefly proliferation. To address this, a series of controlled trials were conducted at the Poultry Research Farm, Department of Livestock Production Management, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, to evaluate moisture-reducing strategies using organic agricultural residues and calcium oxide (lime powder). Paddy straw, rice husk, and lime powder were tested individually and in combinations at inclusion rates of 4%, 8%, and 12%. Preliminary results identified 8% as the optimal concentration. Subsequently, a four-week trial with weekly applications and an additional post-treatment observation period was conducted. Litter moisture, temperature, adult fly density, and in vitro larval counts were recorded on Day 0, Day 1, Day 2, Day 5, and on Days 8, 11, and 14 following the final application. The application of 8% lime powder significantly (p<0.05) reduced litter moisture to 36.38% by the fourth week, compared to 62.51% moisture in the untreated control. A rapid reduction to 29.48% moisture was observed within 24 hours of application. Although litter temperature exhibited minimal variation (32.93°C), larval populations declined markedly post-treatment and remained suppressed up to Day 14. The study concluded that 8% lime powder application effectively reduces litter moisture, thereby disrupting the favorable micro-environment for housefly breeding. This approach offers a practical, economical, and environmentally sustainable strategy for integrated housefly management in poultry housing systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agroindustriais P, 2013. AOAC. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Caracterização, Propagação E Melhoramento Genético De Pitaya Comercial E Nativa Do Cerrado 26(74):62.

Abu-Rayyan AM, Abu-Irmaileh B E and Akkawi M M. 2010. Manure composting reduces house fly population. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 16(2): 99–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.29594

AL-Hasnawi MRA. 2020. November. The toxicity of alkaline compounds of some plants in some aspects of the life of the house fly Musca domestica) Diptera: Musacidae). In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1664, No. 1, p. 012119). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1664/1/012119

Axtell RC, 1970. Integrated fly control program for caged-poultry houses. Journal of Economic Entomology 63(2): 400–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/63.2.400

Baker D, Rice S, Leemon D, Godwin R and James P. 2020. Development of a mycoinsecticide bait formulation for the control of house flies, Musca domestica L. Insects 11(1): 47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11010047

Behrens W, Kolte B, Junker V, Frentrup M, Dolsdorf C, Börger M, Jaleta M, Kabelitz T, Amon T, Werner D and Nübel U. 2023. Bacterial genome sequencing tracks the housefly-associated dispersal of fluoroquinolone-and cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli from a pig farm. Environmental Microbiology 25(6): 1174–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16352

Broce, A.B., 1988. An improved Alsynite trap for stable flies, Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 25(5): 406–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/25.5.406

Eastwood R and Schoenburg R. 1966. An evaluation of two methods for extracting Diptera larvae from poultry droppings. Fatchurochim S, Geden CJ and Axtell RC. 1989. Filth fly (Diptera) oviposition and larval development in poultry manure of various moisture levels. Journal of Entomological Science 24(2): 224–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18474/0749-8004-24.2.224

Geden CJ, Stoffolano JR and Elkinton JS. 1987. Prey-mediated dispersal behavior of Carcinops pumilio (Coleoptera: Histeridae). Environmental Entomology 16(2): 415–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/16.2.415

Geden CJ, Hogsette JA and Jacobs RD. 1999. Effect of airflow on house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) distribution in poultry houses. Journal of Economic Entomology 92(2): 416–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/92.2.416

Gerry AC, 2020. Monitoring house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) activity on animal facilities. Journal of Insect Science 20(6): 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieaa109

Gerry A, Mellano V and Kuney D. 2005. Outdoor composting of poultry manure reduces nuisance fly production. University of California, Riverside, CA, Report, 21.

Gerry AC, Higginbotham GE, Periera LN, Lam A and Shelton CR. 2011. Evaluation of surveillance methods for monitoring house fly abundance and activity on large commercial dairy operations. Journal of Economic Entomology 104(3): 1093–1102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/EC10393

Kaufman PE, Long SJ, Rutz DA and Glenister CS. 2001. Larval production from field- collected Carcinops pumilio (Coleoptera: Histeridae) following three starvation periods. Journal of Medical Entomology 38(2): 278–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585-38.2.278

Ladell WRS. 1936. A new apparatus for separating insects and other arthropods from the soil. Annals of Applied Biology 23(4): 862–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1936.tb06132.x

Matthysse JG and McClain D. 1973. House fly control in climate-controlled caged-hen layer houses. Journal of Economic Entomology 66(4): 927–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/66.4.927

Monyama MC, Taioe OM, Nkhebenyane JS, van Wyk D, Ramatla T and Thekisoe OM. 2023. Bacterial communities associated with houseflies (Musca domestica L.) inhabiting hospices in South Africa. Microorganisms 11(6): 1440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061440

Ponnudurai G, Harikrishnan TJ, Rani N and Meenakshisundaram A. 2011. Comparative efficacy of neem and pungan oil against lice infestation in chicken. Journal of Veterinary Parasitology 25(2): 152–54.

Schmidtmann ET. 1988. Exploitation of bedding in dairy outdoor calf hutches by immature house and stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 25(6): 484–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/25.6.484

Schoenburg RB and Little TM. 1966. A technique for the statistical sampling of Fannia larval densities on poultry ranches. Journal of Economic Entomology 59(6): 1536–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/59.6.1536

Stafford III KC and Bay DE. 1987. Dispersion pattern and association of house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae), larvae and both sexes of Macrocheles muscaedomesticae (Acari: Macrochelidae) in response to poultry manure moisture, temperature, and accumulation. Environmental Entomology 16(1): 159–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/16.1.159

Tańczuk M, Junga R, Kolasa-Więcek A and Niemiec P. 2019. Assessment of the energy potential of chicken manure in Poland. Energies 12(7): 1244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12071244

Watson DW, Rutz DA, Keshavarz K and Waldron JK. 1998. House fly (Musca domestica L.) survival after mechanical incorporation of poultry manure into field soil. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 7(3): 302–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/7.3.302

World Health Organization, 2000. Vector control: Methods for use by individuals and communities Lutte antivectorielle: Méthodes à usage individuel et communautaire.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-06-06

Published

2026-02-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

GAUTAM, A. ., SINGH, Y. ., CHANDI, R. S. ., DUBEY, P. P. ., KAUR, D. ., SINGH, P. ., KASHYAP, N. ., & MAILK, D. . (2026). Innovative strategies using organic agricultural waste and lime for housefly control in poultry farms. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 95(10), 947–952. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v95i10.167616
Citation