Assessment of hygiene practices in the retail poultry meat shops in Bareilly city
11
Keywords:
Retail shop, chicken meat, retailer, consumer, Bareilly cityAbstract
Chicken meat is the most preferred meat species, and it accounts for around 50% of overall meat production in our country. Hygiene practices are one of the key factors in retail poultry meat shops that influence the overall quality and acceptability of the meat. A survey was conducted to assess the existing hygiene practices in retail chicken shops by conducting interviews of both consumers visiting the retail shops and the retailers. Results showed 71.67% of retailers agreed about the existing unhygienic retail practices of the shops. Whereas, 61.67, 11.66, 26.66, and 85% of consumers complained about dirty wooden meat-cutting logs, careless and dirty handling of meat and offal, the presence of flies over the meat surfaces, and the wet, unclean, and dirty appearance of live birds. The entire consumer base (100%) agreed about the dirty wipe cloths used by the retailers during slaughtering and cleaning of the carcass, the dirty working surface, and the dirty hands. Poor ventilation facilities and the absence of fly traps were noticed in 66.67% of retail shops. None of the butchers were found using hand gloves, headgear, etc. Intermittent handwashing was found to be practiced only by 44.44% of retailers, but none were found to use any kinds of hand sanitizer, surface sanitizer, or carcass decontaminant. Half of the retailers (50%) did not have dustbins to discard the waste and offal in their shops. The used knives and logs were found to be cleaned only once at the end of the day of work by 83.34% of retailers. The results showed a poor picture of the existing hygiene practices in the retail shops of Bareilly, which need to be intervened.
Downloads
References
APEDA. 2019. Agri Exchange. Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.
APEDA. 2020. Agricultural and processed food products export development authority. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.
Asrani, S., Kaushik, S., Yadav, K.K., and Asrani, R.K. 2011. Development and testing of documentary film on poultry farming. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 46(3): 385-389..
Bafanda, R., Khandi, S., and Chanoria, A. 2017. Socio-Personal profile of butchers and meat retailers in jammu district of Jammu and Kashmir. International Journal of Livestock Research, 7(11): 227-235.
Bisaillon, J.R., Meek, A.H., and Feltmate, T.E. 1988. An assessment of condemnations of broiler chicken carcasses. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, 52(2): 269-76.
Bora, B., Kumar, D., Biswas, A.K., Faslu Rahman, C.K., and Anand, T.S. 2014. Standardization of processing parameters for production of protein hydrolysate from chicken liver by using Lactobacilli fermentation. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 59(3): 313−319.
Chatterjee, R., and Rajkumar, U. 2015. An overview of poultry production in India. Indian journal of animal health, 54: 89-108.
DAHDF. 2021. National action plan for egg and poultry-2022 For Doubling Farmers’ Income by 2022, Department of animal husbandry and dairying. Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India, New Delhi.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations 2021,https://www.fao.org/state-of-food-agriculture/en/
Junaidu, M., Bhagavandas, M., Yusha, and Umar, U. 2015. Study of knowledge, attitude and practices regarding hygiene among abattoir workers in Kano state metropolitan, Nigeria. International Journal of Science and Research, 4(1): 2474- 2478.
Kiran, M., Prabhu, K.N., Paramesha, S.C., Rajshekar, T., Praveen, M.P., Punitkumar, C., Puneetha, S.C., Kumar, R., Rahul, Y., and Nagabhushan, C. 2018. Consumption pattern, consumer attitude and consumer perception on meat quality and safety in Southern India. International Food Research Journal, 25(3): 1026- 1030.
Mishra, V., Talukder, S., Mendiratta, S.K., Bardhan, D., Kumar, R.R., Jaiswal, R.K., and Prasad, B.G. 2020. Quality evaluation of preferred meat product in Bareilly city. Journal of Animal Research, 10(4): 569-574.
Ojha, S., Mendiratta, S.K., Kumar, R.R., Agrawal, R.K., Talukder, S., Chand, S., Jaiswal, R.K., and Verma, M.R. 2019. Prevailing marketing practices and consumer preference for pork in Bareilly city. Journal of Animal Research, 9(4): 01-07.
Rajesh, K. 2006. Assessment of awareness and hygienic practices among poultry butchers’ in Patna city, Bihar. PhD. Thesis. SCTIMST. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Sneed, J., Strohbehn, C., Gilmore, S.A., and Mendonca, A. 2004. Microbiological evaluation of foodservice contact surfaces in Iowa assisted-living facilities. Journal of American Dieticians Associations, 104: 1722-1724.
Talukder, S., Mendiratta, S.K., Kumar, R.R., Soni, A., and Bardhan, D. 2020. Evaluation of meat consumption pattern and meat quality in North Indian cities. Journal of Animal Research, 10(3): 365-373.
Tebbutt, G.M. 1986. An evaluation of various working practices in shops selling raw and cooked meats. Journal of Hygiene (London), 97(1): 81-90.
Tuneer, K., and Madhavi T. 2015. A comparative study of hygienic status of butchers and identify bacteria among the slaughters of meat, chicken and fish markets of Jagdalpur city, Chhattisgarh. International Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 4(1): 16-24.
Upadhaya, M. and Ghimire, B. 2018. Survey of good hygiene practices in retail meat shops in butwal municipality, Nepal. Nepalese Veterinary Journal, 35: 110-121.
Waghamare, R.N., Popalghat, H.K., Londhe, S.V., Deshmukh, V.V. and Khobe, V.V. 2021. An online survey of consumers of Maharashtra concerning the expected change in the meat and meat product business. Journal of Animal Research, 11(1): 137-141.
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.